the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impact of Satellite-Based Ice Surface Temperature Initialization on Arctic Winter Forecasts Using the Korean Integrated Model
Abstract. Ice surface temperature (IST) is critical for representing surface energy exchange in Arctic forecasts, yet its initialization in operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems remains overly simplified—often inherited from background states or prescribed as spatially uniform values—due to the scarcity of reliable, spatiotemporally continuous observations. This study examines the forecast impact of realistic IST initialization using the Korean Integrated Model (KIM), a global NWP system that performs well at mid- and low-latitudes but shows limited forecast skill over the Arctic, particularly during winter. In its operational configuration, KIM uniformly initializes a fixed IST value of 271.35 K (−1.8 °C) over all sea ice-covered regions, making it a suitable testbed for this investigation. We generate a physically consistent, gap-free IST dataset using a standalone sea ice model nudged with satellite-retrieved ISTs and initialize it into KIM. Numerical experiments for the 2021–2022 Arctic winter show that the control run, despite being initialized with unrealistically warm IST, exhibits a slight cold bias in the lower troposphere—indicating an inherent cooling tendency in KIM that counterbalances artificial heating from the surface boundary. The experimental run, initialized with realistic IST, further amplifies this cold bias. Although random errors are reduced by 3–5 % in the lower atmosphere, the intensified bias ultimately degrades overall forecast performance. These results demonstrate that while realistic IST initialization influences short-range Arctic forecasts, its benefits are limited without concurrent improvements in underlying model bias. The findings underscore the need for parallel improvements in internal model processes to fully realize its benefits, thereby offering guidance for achieving meaningful gains in Arctic forecast accuracy within KIM.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(1349 KB)
-
Supplement
(377 KB)
-
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(1349 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(377 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2071 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 21 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlin your "Code and Data Availability" statement you do not include a permanent repository for the Korean Integrated Model, which is the basis of your submitted work. I am sorry to have to be so outspoken, but this is unacceptable, forbidden by our policy, and your manuscript should have never been accepted for peer-review and Discussions because of it. Our policy clearly states that all the code and data used to produce a manuscript must be published openly and freely to anyone before submitting it to our journal.
Therefore, we are granting you a short time to solve this situation. You have to reply to this comment in a prompt manner with the information for a repository containing the version of the Korean Integrated Model code that you use to produce and replicate your manuscript. The reply must include the link and permanent identifier (e.g. DOI). Also, any future version of your manuscript must include the modified section with the new information.
In the meantime, I am asking the Topical Editor to stop the peer-review process, to avoid wasting the time of reviewers on reviewing a manuscript that as it is right now, it is not publishable in our journal.
Please, note that if you do not fix these problems as requested, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Euijong Kang, 22 Jun 2025
Please find our response to your comments in the attached file.
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 22 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. In order to assess if your submission qualifies for an exception to our policy, we need that you provide additional information on the restrictions imposed to you to share the code of the Korean Integrated Model. This could be official documents, links to official webpages where the restrictions that you mention are listed, etc.
Also, I clarify, that although an exception to the publication is granted, you will continue to have to share the code in an private permanent repository, where editors and reviewers can check access and check it, and the code remains stored permanently with enough guarantee for long-term access.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Euijong Kang, 24 Jun 2025
Please find our response to your comments in the attached file.
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. I have read the "National Research and Development Innovation Act", and I have not found in it any regulation that forbids the distribution of research results funded by the Korean institutions. It is my understanding that articles 16 and 17 are the ones regulating property and use of the research results. Regarding the property, the law states clearly that the Korean institutions developing a research product retain its property. However, this does not have anything to do with distribution. You can distribute something and remain the owner of it.
What is more, article 17.2 clearly states that "Research and development and ownership and researchers must cooperate actively when asked to collaborate on research and development from other researchers", which is the case here: other researchers asking you to share the code of the KIM for scientific collaboration.
Therefore, my assessment according to the above mentioned law is that nothing prevents you of sharing the KIM code, but that actually sharing it is something required by such law. Please, let me know if my interpretation is wrong and why. I have used an automatic translator to read the law and it could result in erroneous interpretations.
Regarding your statement that the code is stored by the Korean Meteorological Agency, I am sorry but this is not enough guarantee for the storage. We would need that you store the code in a external server (for example a private Zenodo repository) or you provide us with access to the internal repositories managed by the Korean Meteorological Agency. Anyway, my current interpretation is that because of the law you mention, this will not be necessary, as nothing prevents you of sharing the KIM code openly.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC3 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Euijong Kang, 25 Jun 2025
Dear Prof. Juan A. Añel,
First of all, I would like to express my respect for your effort in reviewing a legal document written in a foreign language. Although I am not a legal expert, I understand that Articles 16 and 17 of the Act relate to the intellectual property rights associated with research outputs, clarifying ownership and usage rights, while Article 21 concerns the protection of sensitive research information.
It is my understanding that the KMA may be applying Article 21 in this case. This article requires relevant central administrative agencies and research and development institutions to prevent the leakage of important research and development results. Presumably based on this privision, KMA allows the release of model outputs and results for research purposes, but restricts public open to the source code of the national operational NWP system, KIM.
These restrictions are unfortunately beyond our control as authors. Nevertheless, we have made available key boundary condition datasets, our own code, and supporting reference datasets through a public repository to ensure transparency in our research. During the revision process, we will further expand this repository to include representative model outputs for each experimental case.
Furthermore, we will explicitly state this limitation in the “Code and Data Availability” section of the manuscript, in accordance with the journal’s policy: “Where the authors cannot, for reasons beyond their control, publicly archive part or all of the code and data associated with a paper, they must clearly state the restrictions.”
Warm regards,
Euijong Kang
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-AC3 -
CEC4: 'Reply on AC3', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
We can accept your explanation regarding that article 21 prevents the release of the KIM model, but we need to verify it with some additional document, from a manager, the head of the agency or similar, kind of an official letter that states that based on it you are not allowed to share the code.
However, I have to insist that even in such case we need access to the code. As I said previously, this should be done through one of the following options: 1) storage in a private Zenodo repository, or 2) getting a copy of the code from you, or 3) getting access to it in the computers of the Korean Meteorological Agency. If you do not provide it, we will have to reject your manuscript.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC4 -
AC4: 'Reply on CEC4', Euijong Kang, 27 Jun 2025
Dear Prof. Juan A. Añel,
Thank you for your comments.
We have contacted the KMA, and they have confirmed that an official letter can be provided. Regarding the three options you mentioned, we, as authors, do not have the authority to determine any of them. However, the KIM is available under license. This policy is consistent with other centers, such as the UK Met Office or ECMWF, which offer access through licensing agreements. Accordingly, we will revise the Code and Data Availability statement in line with other operational NWP studies, as follows:
“Due to intellectual property rights, the source code for the KIM is not publicly available. However, the KIM is available for use under license. To inquire about licensing arrangements, please contact KIAPS (https://www.kiaps.org/en/main.do) or the Numerical Modeling Division of KMA (https://www.kma.go.kr/nmc; Korean only). General model outputs and related datasets are accessible through the KMA Data Portal (https://data.kma.go.kr/resources/html/en/aowdp.html) and the Korean Government Public Data Portal (https://www.data.go.kr/en/index.do).”
Best regards,
Eui-Jong Kang
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-AC4 -
CEC5: 'Reply on AC4', Juan Antonio Añel, 27 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
I acknowledge your efforts to comply with the policy; however, I must be clear that you must provide us a copy of the code. We are not going to do paperwork to request a license to the KIM. It is your obligation to handle us (at least the editors and reviewers) a copy of the code. Please, articulate the necessary measurements to comply with it. If this represents a major problem for you, then it could be that Geosci. Model Dev. is not the right journal to try to publish your work.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC5 -
AC5: 'Reply on CEC5', Euijong Kang, 21 Jul 2025
Dear Prof. Añel,
Thank you for your clarification.
Given the institutional restrictions on code sharing, we have decided to withdraw our manuscript from Geoscientific Model Development. We sincerely appreciate your time and consideration.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Euijong Kang
on behalf of all co-authorsCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-AC5
-
AC5: 'Reply on CEC5', Euijong Kang, 21 Jul 2025
-
CEC5: 'Reply on AC4', Juan Antonio Añel, 27 Jun 2025
-
AC4: 'Reply on CEC4', Euijong Kang, 27 Jun 2025
-
CEC4: 'Reply on AC3', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Jun 2025
-
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Euijong Kang, 25 Jun 2025
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Jun 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Euijong Kang, 24 Jun 2025
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 22 Jun 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Euijong Kang, 22 Jun 2025
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2071', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Jun 2025
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2071 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 21 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.htmlin your "Code and Data Availability" statement you do not include a permanent repository for the Korean Integrated Model, which is the basis of your submitted work. I am sorry to have to be so outspoken, but this is unacceptable, forbidden by our policy, and your manuscript should have never been accepted for peer-review and Discussions because of it. Our policy clearly states that all the code and data used to produce a manuscript must be published openly and freely to anyone before submitting it to our journal.
Therefore, we are granting you a short time to solve this situation. You have to reply to this comment in a prompt manner with the information for a repository containing the version of the Korean Integrated Model code that you use to produce and replicate your manuscript. The reply must include the link and permanent identifier (e.g. DOI). Also, any future version of your manuscript must include the modified section with the new information.
In the meantime, I am asking the Topical Editor to stop the peer-review process, to avoid wasting the time of reviewers on reviewing a manuscript that as it is right now, it is not publishable in our journal.
Please, note that if you do not fix these problems as requested, we will have to reject your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Euijong Kang, 22 Jun 2025
Please find our response to your comments in the attached file.
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 22 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. In order to assess if your submission qualifies for an exception to our policy, we need that you provide additional information on the restrictions imposed to you to share the code of the Korean Integrated Model. This could be official documents, links to official webpages where the restrictions that you mention are listed, etc.
Also, I clarify, that although an exception to the publication is granted, you will continue to have to share the code in an private permanent repository, where editors and reviewers can check access and check it, and the code remains stored permanently with enough guarantee for long-term access.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Euijong Kang, 24 Jun 2025
Please find our response to your comments in the attached file.
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
Many thanks for your reply. I have read the "National Research and Development Innovation Act", and I have not found in it any regulation that forbids the distribution of research results funded by the Korean institutions. It is my understanding that articles 16 and 17 are the ones regulating property and use of the research results. Regarding the property, the law states clearly that the Korean institutions developing a research product retain its property. However, this does not have anything to do with distribution. You can distribute something and remain the owner of it.
What is more, article 17.2 clearly states that "Research and development and ownership and researchers must cooperate actively when asked to collaborate on research and development from other researchers", which is the case here: other researchers asking you to share the code of the KIM for scientific collaboration.
Therefore, my assessment according to the above mentioned law is that nothing prevents you of sharing the KIM code, but that actually sharing it is something required by such law. Please, let me know if my interpretation is wrong and why. I have used an automatic translator to read the law and it could result in erroneous interpretations.
Regarding your statement that the code is stored by the Korean Meteorological Agency, I am sorry but this is not enough guarantee for the storage. We would need that you store the code in a external server (for example a private Zenodo repository) or you provide us with access to the internal repositories managed by the Korean Meteorological Agency. Anyway, my current interpretation is that because of the law you mention, this will not be necessary, as nothing prevents you of sharing the KIM code openly.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC3 -
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Euijong Kang, 25 Jun 2025
Dear Prof. Juan A. Añel,
First of all, I would like to express my respect for your effort in reviewing a legal document written in a foreign language. Although I am not a legal expert, I understand that Articles 16 and 17 of the Act relate to the intellectual property rights associated with research outputs, clarifying ownership and usage rights, while Article 21 concerns the protection of sensitive research information.
It is my understanding that the KMA may be applying Article 21 in this case. This article requires relevant central administrative agencies and research and development institutions to prevent the leakage of important research and development results. Presumably based on this privision, KMA allows the release of model outputs and results for research purposes, but restricts public open to the source code of the national operational NWP system, KIM.
These restrictions are unfortunately beyond our control as authors. Nevertheless, we have made available key boundary condition datasets, our own code, and supporting reference datasets through a public repository to ensure transparency in our research. During the revision process, we will further expand this repository to include representative model outputs for each experimental case.
Furthermore, we will explicitly state this limitation in the “Code and Data Availability” section of the manuscript, in accordance with the journal’s policy: “Where the authors cannot, for reasons beyond their control, publicly archive part or all of the code and data associated with a paper, they must clearly state the restrictions.”
Warm regards,
Euijong Kang
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-AC3 -
CEC4: 'Reply on AC3', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
We can accept your explanation regarding that article 21 prevents the release of the KIM model, but we need to verify it with some additional document, from a manager, the head of the agency or similar, kind of an official letter that states that based on it you are not allowed to share the code.
However, I have to insist that even in such case we need access to the code. As I said previously, this should be done through one of the following options: 1) storage in a private Zenodo repository, or 2) getting a copy of the code from you, or 3) getting access to it in the computers of the Korean Meteorological Agency. If you do not provide it, we will have to reject your manuscript.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC4 -
AC4: 'Reply on CEC4', Euijong Kang, 27 Jun 2025
Dear Prof. Juan A. Añel,
Thank you for your comments.
We have contacted the KMA, and they have confirmed that an official letter can be provided. Regarding the three options you mentioned, we, as authors, do not have the authority to determine any of them. However, the KIM is available under license. This policy is consistent with other centers, such as the UK Met Office or ECMWF, which offer access through licensing agreements. Accordingly, we will revise the Code and Data Availability statement in line with other operational NWP studies, as follows:
“Due to intellectual property rights, the source code for the KIM is not publicly available. However, the KIM is available for use under license. To inquire about licensing arrangements, please contact KIAPS (https://www.kiaps.org/en/main.do) or the Numerical Modeling Division of KMA (https://www.kma.go.kr/nmc; Korean only). General model outputs and related datasets are accessible through the KMA Data Portal (https://data.kma.go.kr/resources/html/en/aowdp.html) and the Korean Government Public Data Portal (https://www.data.go.kr/en/index.do).”
Best regards,
Eui-Jong Kang
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-AC4 -
CEC5: 'Reply on AC4', Juan Antonio Añel, 27 Jun 2025
Dear authors,
I acknowledge your efforts to comply with the policy; however, I must be clear that you must provide us a copy of the code. We are not going to do paperwork to request a license to the KIM. It is your obligation to handle us (at least the editors and reviewers) a copy of the code. Please, articulate the necessary measurements to comply with it. If this represents a major problem for you, then it could be that Geosci. Model Dev. is not the right journal to try to publish your work.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-CEC5 -
AC5: 'Reply on CEC5', Euijong Kang, 21 Jul 2025
Dear Prof. Añel,
Thank you for your clarification.
Given the institutional restrictions on code sharing, we have decided to withdraw our manuscript from Geoscientific Model Development. We sincerely appreciate your time and consideration.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Euijong Kang
on behalf of all co-authorsCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2071-AC5
-
AC5: 'Reply on CEC5', Euijong Kang, 21 Jul 2025
-
CEC5: 'Reply on AC4', Juan Antonio Añel, 27 Jun 2025
-
AC4: 'Reply on CEC4', Euijong Kang, 27 Jun 2025
-
CEC4: 'Reply on AC3', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Jun 2025
-
AC3: 'Reply on CEC3', Euijong Kang, 25 Jun 2025
-
CEC3: 'Reply on AC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 24 Jun 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on CEC2', Euijong Kang, 24 Jun 2025
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 22 Jun 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Euijong Kang, 22 Jun 2025
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2071', Anonymous Referee #1, 24 Jun 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
337 | 49 | 30 | 416 | 20 | 14 | 22 |
- HTML: 337
- PDF: 49
- XML: 30
- Total: 416
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Eui-Jong Kang
Byung-Ju Sohn
Wonho Kim
Young-Chan Noh
Shihye Lee
In-Hyuk Kwon
Hwan-Jin Song
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(1349 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(377 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote