the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Parent material geochemistry – and not plant input – as the primary element shaping soil organic carbon stocks in European alpine grasslands
Abstract. Soils represent the largest terrestrial carbon (C) reservoir on Earth. Within terrestrial ecosystems, soil geochemistry can be a strong driver of plant-soil-carbon dynamics, especially in young, less weathered soils. Here, we investigate the impact of potential plant biomass input, soil fertility parameters, and soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization mechanisms on the distribution of SOC in European alpine grasslands across gradients of geochemically distinct parent materials. We demonstrate that SOC stock accrual in geochemically young, developing alpine soils is dependent on soil mineralogy as a result of parent material weathering, and is not strongly linked to plant biomass input. We show potential differences in the importance of SOC stabilization mechanisms, with universally large relative contributions (≥ 50 %) of the microaggregate soil fraction to bulk SOC. We further show that concentrations of Fe, Al and Mn pedogenic oxides coincide with SOC stock magnitude across an alpine soil geochemical gradient, where SOC stocks range between 8.1–23.2 kg C m−2. Our results highlight that soil fertility, which governs plant C inputs, and soil mineralogical characteristics, which control C stabilization, play equally crucial roles in predicting SOC contents in alpine soils at an early development stage, corroborated by soil fraction modern (F14C) values ranging from 0.77–1.06.
- Preprint
(1372 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 09 Jul 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2006', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 May 2025
reply
Maier et al studied the distribution and mechanisms controlling SOC distribution along a geochemical gradient of soil parent materials. The manuscript is overall well-written and the analyses are appropriated. The study compared plant inputs, soil characteristics and parent material in explaining the SOC stocks along the geochemical gradient and pointed out that “Parent material geochemistry – and not plant input - as the primary element shaping soil organic carbon stocks in European alpine grasslands”. Please find below my major and minor concerns.
- From the experimental results to European alpine grasslands. Because the experimental setting is along the geochemical gradients of soil parent materials, so the sites are selected to represent the difference in parent material. Comparisons among selected sites showed that parent material is important. Does it fair to conclude that parent material is more important than input for (entire) European alpine grasslands? Would the conclusion be different if you select the experiment sites across a plant input gradience?
- Soil fertility vs. soil mineralogy model. The authors build random forest models with 42 samples and multiple explainable variables. Do these models face overfitting issues? What insights can we gain from these analyses, especially differentiating soil fertility vs. mineralogy? I feel the rationale is not very well justified. Why not have plant input as an explainable variable, and why not plant input, fertility and minerology together explain SOC variations?
- Soil aggregates. The study found that microaggregate contributes to a large (>50%) portion of bulk SOC, and inferred those sites with metal oxides favored the formation of microaggregate. Are there approaches to provide more direct evidence from this experiment?
- Please double check on figures. There seem swaps. For example, Figure 3a, Gneiss, the crosshatch and solid part seem did not follow the texts. The crosshatch is much big, but in the text, it states that the wood (solid) is bigger. Figure 5 c, should it be the soil fertility model, but in the captions, it states “soil mineralogy model”. This swap also affects Figure 5d
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2006-RC1 -
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-2006', Frank Hagedorn, 12 Jun 2025
reply
The manuscript by Maier et al. represents a comprehensive assessment on SOC storage in alpine grassland soils, clearly demonstrating that parent material geochemistry plays a dominant role in controlling SOC stocks; an aspect often overlooked in the current literature.
Although alpine soils are known to be particularly stony, it remains unreported if and how coarse stone fragments have been incorporated in the estimates of SOC stocks. The authors state that soil sampling was conducted using Kopecky cylinders (100 cm³) within soil profiles and Edelman augers to bedrock depth. Although this method permits estimation of bulk or fine earth density within the cylinder volume, it does not capture larger stone fragments present throughout the profile. In stony soils, typical for alpine environments, omitting these coarse fragments can lead to substantial overestimation of SOC stocks (Poeplau et al., 2017). Given the frequent absence of direct measurements of coarse fragments, many studies apply corrections to SOC stock estimates based on field-derived stone content data. It is therefore recommended that the authors clarify whether such corrections were applied, and if not, to discuss the implications for their SOC stock estimates.
Additionally, reporting the slope of each soil profile is important for enabling surface-area-based corrections of SOC stocks (Prietzel & Wiesmeier, 2019).
Accurate sampling methods and SOC stock estimations are essential for enabling meaningful comparisons across ecosystems and for supporting upscaling efforts. A critical discussion of the uncertainties associated with SOC stock estimates would be valuable, even though these uncertainties do not undermine the manuscript’s central finding that parent material geochemistry is a key control on SOC storage.
References
Poeplau, C., Vos, C., and Don, A.: Soil organic carbon stocks are systematically overestimated by misuse of the parameters bulk density and rock fragment content, SOIL, 3, 61–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-61-2017, 2017.
Prietzel, J., Wiemeier, M. (2019) A concept to optimize the accuracy of soil surface area and SOC stock quantification in mountainous landscapes, Geoderma, 356, 113922, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113922
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2006-CC1
Data sets
Datasets for Maier et al., Parent material geochemistry – and not plant input – as the primary element shaping soil organic carbon stocks in European alpine grasslands (pre-publication version) Annina Maier and Maria E. Macfarlane https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15282598
Model code and software
Code for Maier et al., Parent material geochemistry – and not plant input – as the primary element shaping soil organic carbon stocks in European alpine grasslands (pre-publication version) Annina Maier and Maria E. Macfarlane https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15282213
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
115 | 39 | 9 | 163 | 4 | 8 |
- HTML: 115
- PDF: 39
- XML: 9
- Total: 163
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1