Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1920
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1920
26 Jun 2025
 | 26 Jun 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Leveraging reforecasts for flood estimation with long continuous simulation: a proof-of-concept study

Daniel Viviroli, Martin Jury, Maria Staudinger, Martina Kauzlaric, Heimo Truhez, and Douglas Maraun

Abstract. Flood estimation is critical for risk assessment, but traditional methods are often constrained by the limited length of observation data. This study explores the potential of reforecasts (RFs) to enhance flood estimation through use in long continuous simulation (CS) with a hydrological model. As a proof of concept, we processed individual RFs from the vast database of the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) with bias correction, stochastic downscaling and disaggregation with analogs to finally obtain mean areal precipitation and mean areal temperature for a set of test catchments in Switzerland. We subsequently concatenated these RFs into a time series of close to 10 000 years length and used them in long CS to derive flood return levels. Results demonstrate the potential of RFs as a complementary tool in flood estimation, providing insights into extreme event magnitudes and frequencies. Moreover, RFs can provide a relevant alternative view on exceptionally high extremes when compared to flood estimates derived from using other inputs to long CS, such as those generated by a stochastic weather generator. Limitations apply to catchments smaller than approximately 500 km², where the stochastic downscaling becomes increasingly inadequate, especially for resolving convective events. There, dynamical downscaling would be more appropriate, but was not feasible with the data currently available.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Daniel Viviroli, Martin Jury, Maria Staudinger, Martina Kauzlaric, Heimo Truhez, and Douglas Maraun

Status: open (until 14 Aug 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Daniel Viviroli, Martin Jury, Maria Staudinger, Martina Kauzlaric, Heimo Truhez, and Douglas Maraun
Daniel Viviroli, Martin Jury, Maria Staudinger, Martina Kauzlaric, Heimo Truhez, and Douglas Maraun

Viewed

Total article views: 123 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
98 20 5 123 5 5 8
  • HTML: 98
  • PDF: 20
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 123
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 121 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 121 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
Estimating the frequency and magnitude of floods is challenging due to the limited length of streamflow records. Here, we explore whether an extensive archive of meteorological forecasts run over past dates can assist in this context. After processing and concatenating these data for use as input to a hydrological model, we derive flood statistics from simulated streamflow. Results are promising for the larger catchments studied, providing a valuable complementary perspective on rare floods.
Share