the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Simulation of a contrail formation and early life cycle for a realistic airliner geometry
Abstract. Contrails—ice clouds that form in aircraft wakes—are thought to have a radiative impact up to twice that of CO2 emissions, although this estimate remains debated due to significant uncertainties. These uncertainties underline the need for further research into the entire life cycle of contrails, from the formation of initial ice crystals to their potential evolution into persistent cirrus clouds. The challenge lies in the wide range of spatial and temporal scales involved in contrail development.
This work presents a novel numerical methodology for simulating contrails from the onset of ice crystal formation to the dissipation of wingtip vortices. Unlike conventional methods that rely on analytical initialization, our approach couples Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) with Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and synthetic turbulence techniques. This allows for a more accurate capture of near-field effects and a detailed consideration of how aircraft geometry influences the aerodynamic wake and subsequent contrail evolution.
Applied to a realistic aircraft under standard atmospheric conditions, our methodology revealed that horizontal tailplane vortices can trigger short-wavelength instabilities in wingtip vortices, significantly modifying the structure of the secondary wake. Comparisons with classical approaches show that the contrails generated by this work methodology are wider and more opaque, indicating a potentially greater warming effect.
- Preprint
(6580 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1865', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Jun 2025
The scientific paper is well written and utilises an appropriate and well justified approach to modelling aircraft contrails, considering design factors which are often neglected in other studies. The comparison between methodologies (analytical + LES, RANS + LES) highlight the need for the current research with suitable conclusions drawn. Overall, the paper is structured and presented well.
A few points are highlighted for potential updates to the current and/or future work:
- Line 37 - an addition of a value to define soot-rich conditions? This would also make clear what constitutes soot-poor in the next sentence.
- The model references that the engine is representative of an UHBR turbofan, however the water vapour emissions used (and hence in effect, estimated fuel flow) are from an RB211. This is an older, much lower BPR engine. It does not take away from the results and modelling, but perhaps more representative boundary condition to an UHBR could be used within future work.
- Figure 2 could be reduced in size, and/or added alongside it, images of the mesh (and result of mesh adaption process) downstream could be shown to understand how refined RANS grids must be.
- The water vapour and soot particle emission number could also be added in Table 1 for engine boundary conditions. This would allow for results to replicated and compared more accurately within the community. This would be beneficial whilst experimental measurements remain scarce.
- Line 329 - would assuming that all soot particles were activated not lead to smaller ice crystals, as more particles compete for the same water vapour?
A few technical corrections could also be addressed:
- In abstract/introduction, CO2 and NOx do not use subscripts. In 2.2 Microphysical Model, the chemical formulas do use subscripts. To be consistent, should CO2 and NOx use subscripts too? (i.e. CO2, NOX)
- Line 24 - can use ERF instead of 'effective radiative forcing' as acronym just introduced.
- Line 76 - Use of ‘us’ – ‘This allowed the full… …to be taken into account’ would be less ambiguous.
- Line 224 - Are these values defined within a table? (i.e. Tab. ??)
- Line 232 - Need to update table reference (Tab. ??)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1865-RC1 - AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Younes Bouhafid, 29 Aug 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1865', Anonymous Referee #3, 02 Jul 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Younes Bouhafid, 29 Aug 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
389 | 59 | 22 | 470 | 6 | 19 |
- HTML: 389
- PDF: 59
- XML: 22
- Total: 470
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1