the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
On the control of the position of the winter sea ice edge by the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
Abstract. The Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) is often considered a natural barrier for the northward expansion of the Antarctic sea ice, but the underlying processes remain little explored. Here, we focus on the main fronts of the ACC – as a measure of the current system's path – to study how they may control the mean state of sea ice. We find that the latitude of all ACC fronts as a function of longitude shows a correlation above 0.85 with the climatological mean latitude of the winter sea ice edge, indicating a strong link across all sectors of the Southern Ocean. Among the ACC fronts, the Polar Front is identified as the best indicator for studying the ACC's influence on sea ice, as it marks a distinct transition in upper-ocean water mass properties and is consistently found north of the sea ice edge. The distance between the Polar Front and the sea ice edge decreases when the Polar Front lies farther south, due to the presence of warmer waters at higher latitudes. These warmer waters enable efficient heat transport toward the ice edge and constitute a barrier to sea ice expansion, via two mechanisms in particular. First, mesoscale ocean eddies generated downstream of large topographic barriers transport heat poleward. Second, warmer oceanic surface waters near the front heat the atmosphere above, which then carries this heat poleward towards the ice, especially in regions with more southward-directed winds. Since the Polar Front's path is largely shaped by topographic barriers, these results indicate why the position of the winter sea ice edge is strongly constrained, under current conditions, by bathymetry.
- Preprint
(2389 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1837', Kaihe Yamazaki, 04 Jun 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Hugues Goosse, 11 Aug 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1837', martina zapponini, 12 Jul 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-1837/egusphere-2025-1837-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Hugues Goosse, 11 Aug 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
519 | 68 | 15 | 602 | 19 | 28 |
- HTML: 519
- PDF: 68
- XML: 15
- Total: 602
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 28
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Review of "On the control of the position of the winter sea ice edge by the Antarctic Circumpolar Current" by Goosse et al.
This manuscript investigates the influence of the ACC fronts on the climatological mean position of the Antarctic winter sea ice edge. Using established frontal definitions (Orsi et al., 1995; Park et al., 2019) and observational/reanalysis datasets for sea ice, atmospheric, and oceanic variables, the authors find strong correlations (> 0.85) between the latitudes of all major ACC fronts and the winter sea ice edge. The Polar Front (PF) is identified as the most consistent indicator. The study proposes two primary mechanisms for this control: 1) poleward heat transport by mesoscale eddies generated downstream of topographic barriers, and 2) atmospheric warming above warmer surface waters near the PF, with this heat subsequently transported poleward towards the ice, particularly with southward-directed winds. The authors conclude that bathymetry, by shaping the PF's path, strongly constrains the winter sea ice edge.
General Comments:
A very well-written, clearly structured, and valuable contribution to understanding the controls on Antarctic sea ice extent. The study addresses an important and under-explored link in a circumpolar manner. The use of multiple frontal definitions and a relatively simple yet effective methodology lends robustness to the main conclusions. The identified mechanisms are physically plausible and supported by the presented evidence and previous studies. The figures are generally clear and effectively support the text, with Figure 9 providing an excellent summary.
My concern is the relative lack of discussion on the role of subpolar gyres and the Antarctic Divergence. These features are intrinsically linked to the ACC, upwelling of CDW, and spread of WW, and thus might be highly relevant to SIE positioning. The central narrative that the "ACC/PF controls the winter sea ice edge," while supported by the presented correlations, might potentially be a trivialization or, at least, could benefit from a more nuanced discussion of these interconnected Southern Ocean dynamics.
Specific Comments:
I believe that addressing these points will strengthen the manuscript and offer a more balanced perspective on the complex oceanographic controls influencing the Antarctic winter sea ice edge. This work is otherwise of high quality and is well-suited for publication in The Cryosphere. I sincerely thank the authors for their valuable contribution and look forward to their response.
Best regards,
Dr Kaihe Yamazaki
ARC Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science (ACEAS)
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studie, University of Tasmania