the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Nitrogen dynamics and nitrate stable isotopes indicate nitrogen loss in the Bay of Bengal
Abstract. Oxygen minimum zones (OMZ) play an important role for the global oceanic nitrogen cycle because they account for 20 to 40 % of the global loss of bioavailable nitrogen despite covering only about 1 % of the global ocean volume. The intermediate waters of the Bay of Bengal (BoB) host one of the most pronounced OMZs with near-anoxic conditions. However, it has not yet been recognized as a site with significant nitrate reduction. In this study, we examined the nitrogen cycling processes in the East Equatorial Indian Ocean (EEIO) and the BoB by measuring water column properties, including temperature, salinity, oxygen and nutrient concentrations, as well as nitrate isotope signatures, collected during the SO305 BIOCAT-IIOE2 cruise in April and May 2024. Potential temperature and salinity profiles showed distinct water masses and limited mixing between BoB and the EEIO at 5° N.
Nitrate stable isotope depth profiles varied significantly, driven by water mass distribution below 300 m and in-situ fractionation above 300 m. Phytoplankton uptake acts as a nitrate sink in the surface waters, showing a significant isotopic enrichment and nitrogen deficit. Below, nitrification was observed, primarily through regenerative production using previously assimilated biomass rather than newly fixed nitrogen from N2 fixation. Within the OMZ of the BoB, we identified a persistent nitrogen deficit and slightly enriched nitrate isotopes between 100 and 300 m, indicating a nitrogen loss, which we attributed to anammox as the dominant nitrogen loss pathway in the BoB.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Biogeosciences. The authors have no other competing interests to declare.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(1760 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1660', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 May 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-1660/egusphere-2025-1660-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-1660-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Gesa Schulz, 02 Jul 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1660', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Jun 2025
Nitrogen dynamics and nitrate stable isotopes indicate nitrogen loss in the Bay of Bengal
Gesa Schulz, Kirstin Dähnke, Tina Sanders, Jan Penopp, Hermann W. Bange, Rena Czeschel, and Birgit GayeGeneral comments:
The manuscript looks at the nitrogen cycling in the Bay of Bengal as well as East Equatorial Indian Ocean. The methodologies are detailed, the data well presented and the discussion follows a logical pathway.
Motivation:
The authors make a good case of why the Bay of Bengal OMZ is important to study. It is not clear, however, why they chose EEIO. Please include a section about why you study this region.
Specific comments:
L21: “Below”. Do the authors mean “subsurface waters”?
L27: Please change to “unavailable for most organisms”
L31: Denitrification may also be autotrophic. Please restructure this sentence.
L41: Define “low oxygen” and “anoxic”
L43&44: Add references for “…oxygen concentrations upto 20µM” and “…concentrations of 6µM”
L59: “dual”: please mention N and O in parentheses.
L87: “large amount of freshwater input”: a number would be helpful
Figure 2: I would recommend adding BoB and EEIO in the figures too.
L124: How was particulate nitrogen measures? Did the authors scrape material from the filter paper or pellets or any other way?
L133-134 : The international standards are reported for NO3- and not Nox. I suggest writing NO3- . Same goes for the samples: since the authors have ensured nitrite removal.
L165: Where is the figure for ammonium concentrations?
L177: “heaviest isotope signature….upto 13.9‰ “ yet Fig 3e shows δ15N>20‰
Figure 3: Please keep the labels identical for all . (a)-(j) are on the bottom right while (k)-(n) on bottom left.
L201: It is not clear what is a “strong oxygen minimum zone”?
L340: Is the calculation of δ15N of nitrite shown?
L367: I would like to see the authors discuss a few more Indian Ocean studies. For e.g. how distinct is it to the Arabian Sea OMZ?
Technical corrections:
L98: onboard R/V Sonne
L124: Dried filters were used “to”
L127-132: The authors use the past tense in some sentences and the present tense. I believe the past tense is more appropriate.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1660-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Gesa Schulz, 02 Jul 2025
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1660', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 May 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-1660/egusphere-2025-1660-RC1-supplement.pdf
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Gesa Schulz, 02 Jul 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1660', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 Jun 2025
Nitrogen dynamics and nitrate stable isotopes indicate nitrogen loss in the Bay of Bengal
Gesa Schulz, Kirstin Dähnke, Tina Sanders, Jan Penopp, Hermann W. Bange, Rena Czeschel, and Birgit GayeGeneral comments:
The manuscript looks at the nitrogen cycling in the Bay of Bengal as well as East Equatorial Indian Ocean. The methodologies are detailed, the data well presented and the discussion follows a logical pathway.
Motivation:
The authors make a good case of why the Bay of Bengal OMZ is important to study. It is not clear, however, why they chose EEIO. Please include a section about why you study this region.
Specific comments:
L21: “Below”. Do the authors mean “subsurface waters”?
L27: Please change to “unavailable for most organisms”
L31: Denitrification may also be autotrophic. Please restructure this sentence.
L41: Define “low oxygen” and “anoxic”
L43&44: Add references for “…oxygen concentrations upto 20µM” and “…concentrations of 6µM”
L59: “dual”: please mention N and O in parentheses.
L87: “large amount of freshwater input”: a number would be helpful
Figure 2: I would recommend adding BoB and EEIO in the figures too.
L124: How was particulate nitrogen measures? Did the authors scrape material from the filter paper or pellets or any other way?
L133-134 : The international standards are reported for NO3- and not Nox. I suggest writing NO3- . Same goes for the samples: since the authors have ensured nitrite removal.
L165: Where is the figure for ammonium concentrations?
L177: “heaviest isotope signature….upto 13.9‰ “ yet Fig 3e shows δ15N>20‰
Figure 3: Please keep the labels identical for all . (a)-(j) are on the bottom right while (k)-(n) on bottom left.
L201: It is not clear what is a “strong oxygen minimum zone”?
L340: Is the calculation of δ15N of nitrite shown?
L367: I would like to see the authors discuss a few more Indian Ocean studies. For e.g. how distinct is it to the Arabian Sea OMZ?
Technical corrections:
L98: onboard R/V Sonne
L124: Dried filters were used “to”
L127-132: The authors use the past tense in some sentences and the present tense. I believe the past tense is more appropriate.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1660-RC2 - AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Gesa Schulz, 02 Jul 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
643 | 102 | 20 | 765 | 30 | 40 |
- HTML: 643
- PDF: 102
- XML: 20
- Total: 765
- BibTeX: 30
- EndNote: 40
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1