the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Tropical wet season runoff mobilises younger carbon in rainforest streams but older carbon in agricultural streams
Abstract. Knowledge of the age of organic carbon (C) that is leached from soils to streams is key to understanding how C is mobilised within ecosystems. The tropics are characterised by significant C fluxes through streams, yet the time scales of organic C sequestration and export remain uncertain in these regions. Here we examined the concentration, composition and age of dissolved organic C (DOC) in 18 small mountainous catchments of the Australian humid tropics, including six rainforest and 12 agricultural catchments, sampled during both the dry and wet seasons. We found that DOC ages varied widely across sites but were generally centuries to millennia old (median ± standard deviation 1,553 ± 848 years BP), with no consistent differences between rainforest and agricultural catchments. However, the two land use categories diverged in their responses to high flow conditions, with DOC age in rainforest streams tending to decrease from 1,878 ± 604 years BP in the dry season to 708 ± 791 years BP in the wet season, whereas agricultural streams mobilised similarly aged or older DOC in the wet season (1,728 ± 641 years BP) than in the dry season (1,303 ± 1,036 years BP). A subset of dissolved inorganic C (DIC) samples collected from three of the catchments (both rainforest and agricultural) indicated that DIC was mostly modern (123 ± 136 years BP) and always younger than DOC. These differences in DIC and DOC ages suggest a partial decoupling between DOC and DIC export pathways, with DOC derived from older soil C pools, while DIC reflected recent C inputs from vegetation uptake and decomposition. Our results highlight the importance of seasonal shifts in the age of C export and the need to conduct sampling that encompasses seasonality in human-impact studies to better constrain C pools and sinks.
- Preprint
(1209 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(382 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1600', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Jul 2025
reply
In this manuscript, Duvert et al investigate the age of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) mobilised by streams in rainforest and agricultural dominated catchments during wet and dry seasons. Understanding how, and if, old OC is mobilised from landscapes with different land use/land cover is relevant for projections on global C budgets. The current changes in rainfall regimes, specially in the tropics, have also strong implications for C mobilisation and export. Yet, the number of studies addressing both spatial and temporal variations are limited. Considering this, the work of Duvert et al is timing. I found the manuscript well-organised and scientifically sound.
Key strengths of the manuscript: a) the hypothesis and how the authors address each one throughout the manuscript; b) the experimental design (study area and parameters measured); c) the number of samples for radiocarbon analysis as it is above the average found in for similar studies; d) the use of H and O stable isotopes in water to link the hydrological and C cycle, and e) data analysis, presentation and interpretation.
The main limitation of this work is the calculation of the fraction of mineralised DOC that contributes to DIC. The results indicate that that between 13-65% of the DIC originates from in-stream mineralisation of DOC (line 262). Given the low number of samples analysed for DIC (only three samples per season), the uncertainty around those estimates is rather high. Moreover, the mixed-model approach to calculate the fraction of DOC being mineralised appears not robust enough. The authors partially acknowledge this limitation (lines 190-195). Although estimating these contributions is interesting, it appears that it's beyond the scope of the manuscript. Hypothesis #3 refers to a comparison between the age of DOC and DIC (line 87). I would suggest to provide an interpretation of the 14C-DIC values without calculating the contribution of mineralised DOC to DIC.
There are some areas in which the manuscript can be improved:
- The language can be slightly improved: went on to show (line 48), were always lower (line 221), water stable isotopes (line 210; water does not have isotopes but H and O do), relatively stable between seasons (line 221), here (lines 82, 84 and 87), coarse estimates (line 192), in depletion of modern carbon (line 83).
- Please include information about the type of splines used in the generalised additive model. This is important for reproducibility. Alternatively, the authors can make the code publicly available which I strongly recommend.
- Include all available data in Figure 5.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1600-RC1
Data sets
Dataset: stream carbon age in the Australian humid tropics Clément Duvert https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/c5e20d5ffe5441e2bf54ba0561fb4dd4/
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
570 | 68 | 9 | 647 | 21 | 15 | 32 |
- HTML: 570
- PDF: 68
- XML: 9
- Total: 647
- Supplement: 21
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 32
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1