Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1590
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1590
07 May 2025
 | 07 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Use of delayed ERA5-Land soil moisture products for improving landslide early warning

Nunziarita Palazzolo, Antonino Cancelliere, Robert D. Zofei, and David J. Peres

Abstract. Previous studies have demonstrated that incorporating ECMWF ERA5-Land soil moisture products can improve the predictive performance of landslide-triggering thresholds. However, these data are released with a five-day latency, which limits their immediate operational use in Landslide Early Warning Systems (LEWSs). In this study, we investigate whether delayed soil moisture data – ranging from 0 to 15 days prior to rainfall events – can still effectively inform landslide-triggering conditions. Specifically, we develop artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained on various delay times and evaluate how detection performances vary with increasing lag. Focusing on Sicily, Italy, our results show that even delayed soil moisture data consistently outperform models based solely on rainfall (TSS = 0.68 vs. 0.59). Notably, TSS reduces only marginally, from 0.78 with no delay to 0.72 with five-day delay, and 0.67 with fifteen-day delay. This performance remains higher than that obtained using only soil moisture data (without precipitation and no delay, TSS = 0.53), as well as those achieved with a traditional power-law threshold based on rainfall intensity and duration (TSS = 0.50) and also through ANN model using rainfall intensity and duration (TSS = 0.59). These findings are, thus, promising for an operational use of ERA5-Land soil moisture products in LEWSs.

Competing interests: David J. Peres is associated editor of the editorial board of Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Nunziarita Palazzolo, Antonino Cancelliere, Robert D. Zofei, and David J. Peres

Status: open (until 18 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Nunziarita Palazzolo, Antonino Cancelliere, Robert D. Zofei, and David J. Peres
Nunziarita Palazzolo, Antonino Cancelliere, Robert D. Zofei, and David J. Peres

Viewed

Total article views: 86 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
74 9 3 86 2 2
  • HTML: 74
  • PDF: 9
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 86
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 90 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 90 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 15 May 2025
Download
Short summary
We investigate whether ERA5-Land reanalysis soil moisture data, despite their 5-days publication delay, can be useful for improving the performance of relationships providing triggering conditions for landslides. Using artificial neural networks, we find that soil moisture delayed even up to 15 days allows an improvement of performance respect to precipitation-based models, therefore corroborating the potential use of ERA5-Land soil moisture for improving landslide early warning.
Share