the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hydrodynamic and Primary Production Effects on Seasonal DO Variability in the Danube River
Abstract. Dissolved oxygen (DO) is a fundamental indicator for water quality and ecosystem health, particularly in the context of anthropogenic impacts and climate change. This study presents the first large-scale dataset of DO concentration combined with its stable oxygen isotope ratios (expressed as δ18ODO), particulate organic carbon concentrations (POC) and respiration/ photosynthesis (R/P ratios) from five seasonal campaigns along the entire Danube River in 2023 and 2024. Our findings reveal pronounced seasonal DO dynamics driven by temperature, biological activity and hydrodynamic conditions. During spring and summer, enhanced photosynthesis increased DO up to 0.40 mmol/L with δ18ODO values down to +12.1 ‰ and POC up to 0.25 mmol/L in two highly productive river sections. The strong correlation between δ18ODO and POC further confirms the dominant influence of primary producers (i.e., photosynthetic organisms) in a river section where a reduced slope led to slower flow and lower turbulence. Notably, δ18ODO values were significantly lower than those expected for atmospheric equilibrium (+24.6 ‰ ± 0.4 ‰), a pattern rarely documented in large river systems. In contrast, tributary inflows from the Tisa and Sava rivers diluted biomass and organic material inputs and led to declines in DO and POC. By late summer, intensified respiration reversed photosynthetic signals, led to the lowest DO concentrations down to 0.16 mmol/L and raised δ18ODO up to +23.7 ‰, particularly in the Sava River. In fall, DO levels partially recovered despite continued respiration, while in winter, oxygen input from the atmosphere became the dominant control with minimal biological influences. Overall, this study provides new insights into dynamic interplays between oxygen sources and sinks across the river continuum over seasons. These new insights underscore the need for continuous DO monitoring, particularly in late summer when oxygen levels can become critically low. Understanding these interactions can help to establish efficient aqueous ecosystem management and conservation strategies in the face of environmental and climate change.
- Preprint
(4671 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2219 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 19 Jun 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1580', Marlene Dordoni, 06 May 2025
reply
Review of “Hydrodynamic and Primary Production Effects on Seasonal DO Variability in the Danube River”
By Jan Maier, Anna-Neva Visser, Christina M. Schubert, Simon T. Wander, Johannes A. C. Barth
- General comments on manuscript quality and scientific relevance
The manuscript “Hydrodynamic and Primary Production Effects on Seasonal DO Variability in the Danube River” by Maier et al. presents an original case study that meets the criteria of good scientific quality and offers a valuable contribution to our understanding of river systems. It is well structured, and findings are appropriately discussed with reference to relevant literature. The results are clearly outlined and reproducible.
The manuscript focuses on dissolved oxygen (DO) dynamics in the Danube River and offers insights into DO relationship with particulate organic carbon (POC) and the role of respiration/photosynthesis (R/P) ratios. These aspects are of significant relevance to the field of biogeosciences and this contribution is therefore suitable for publication in Biogeosciences.
However, there are specific aspects that the authors may wish to elaborate on further (see "Specific comments").
- Specific comments
(19-20) I would report results from fall 2023, as they showed the highest δ18ODO.
(42) Here it is worth mentioning that chemical processes may become significant DO-sinks too (10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.014 , 10.3133/ofr20091004 , 10.5194/egusphere-egu25-2083)
(75) I am not familiar with this river system and would perhaps have appreciated a more in-depth description of the Danube configuration (e.g. the Iron Gates).
(93) I would add information regarding the apparatus of the “sampling bottle” used for sampling, and how “well-mixed water samples” were obtained.
(223-224) I would move this to the “Discussion”.
(273) I do agree that this significant DO depletion is linked both to reduced O2 solubility in water and to enhanced organic matter decomposition due to higher temperatures. High levels of POC do not necessarily contradict this interpretation, as sampling frequency may not have allowed a complete record of POC dynamics. Additionally, note that δ18ODO was proven to be more sensitive to metabolic changes than other chemical parameters (10.1111/jpy.13455 ).
(324) It might be helpful to briefly clarify which types of primary producers are being referred to. When multiple phytoplankton communities coexist, different groups can exhibit diverse photosynthetic rates. This can lead to varying contributions to the DO pool. This aspect could be investigated through phytoplankton community characterization or by analyses of carbon isotopes in POC. I would suggest applying the same approach to address the issue discussed in lines (326–330). In this case, δ¹³CPOC could become particularly useful to distinguish POC sources and assess whether the data scattering observed in Figure 6d might reflect a case of Simpson’s paradox.
(326-339) “This lack of correlation may result from the stabilization of high DO values during this transition period”: could the authors elaborate on this point?
(396-405) I would incorporate this into the “Conclusions”.
- Technical corrections
(33) I would replace “disasters” with “stressors” or “perturbations”.
(42-44) I would rephrase the second half of the sentence with the use of a semicolon.
(81) Information on data sharing on PANGAEA is sufficiently specified in “Data availability” (line 430).
(85) Minor issues with the legend should be fixed (e.g. brackets).
(162 and 166 and 279) Please use the same number of decimal places for the same parameter (e.g. 0.4 -> 0.40).
(162) This is a stylistic choice, but I would use “mmol L-1” instead of “mmol/L”.
(170) Please ensure that the blue arrows are referenced in the legend of all plots.
(193) Space missing between “500” and “km”.
(210) Perhaps the sentence should be partially reworded to remove the word “created”.
(234) I suppose “enhancing” should be replaced by “enhanced”.
(263) Space missing between the references and “and”.
(303) Perhaps “and” -> “that”.
(421) “2” as subscript.
(430) I would insert a comma (same in the supplementary materials).
(521) DOI is missing.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1580-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
111 | 17 | 6 | 134 | 11 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 111
- PDF: 17
- XML: 6
- Total: 134
- Supplement: 11
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1