Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1568
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1568
30 Jul 2025
 | 30 Jul 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Towards better black carbon emission estimates in Europe: assimilating observations with a Bayesian inversion framework

August Thomasson, Pontus Roldin, Nick Schutgens, Babitha George, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Guillaume Monteil, and Marko Scholze

Abstract. There are large discrepancies between different black carbon (BC) bottom-up emission estimates. This affects our understanding of how BC affects population health and climate. Previous studies have presented top-down estimates in various domains but estimates in Europe for more than a few months are lacking. With the Lund University Modular Inversion Algorithm (LUMIA) and the FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART), we aim to calculate top-down estimates of anthropogenic BC emissions by assimilating surface observations from 24 background sites in Europe (15° W–35° E, 33–73° N) during 2021. The results show that the bottom-up BC inventory generally underestimates emissions in the domain. Annually, the resulting top-down emissions are 411 ± 10 Gg of BC, 18 % higher than the bottom-up estimate of 349 ± 30 Gg used as a prior. The largest increases in emissions occur in Eastern parts of Europe during spring and summer, while emissions in Poland and Italy are reduced during winter and autumn. The overall posterior emissions are most sensitive to changes in the observational network on the periphery, resulting in a reduced standard deviation compared to the prior emissions in the central domain, where the network density is high. A cross-validation scheme, where one site at the time is removed for validation, show that the posterior for a majority of sites fit independent observations better than the prior emissions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
August Thomasson, Pontus Roldin, Nick Schutgens, Babitha George, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Guillaume Monteil, and Marko Scholze

Status: open (until 10 Sep 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
August Thomasson, Pontus Roldin, Nick Schutgens, Babitha George, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Guillaume Monteil, and Marko Scholze
August Thomasson, Pontus Roldin, Nick Schutgens, Babitha George, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Guillaume Monteil, and Marko Scholze

Viewed

Total article views: 414 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
371 33 10 414 6 12
  • HTML: 371
  • PDF: 33
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 414
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 413 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 413 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We present top-down black carbon emissions estimates in Europe based on surface observations of concentrations at 24 rural sites from 2021. The annual emissions are 411 ± 10 Gg, overall 18 % higher compared to a traditional bottom-up estimate. Emissions are higher in for instance eastern Europe and the Iberian peninsula but lower in Poland and Italy. Validation with independent observations show overall better match and the uncertainties are reduced.
Share