Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1496
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1496
19 May 2025
 | 19 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Litter vs. Lens: Evaluating LAI from Litter Traps and Hemispherical Photos Across View Zenith Angles and Leaf Fall Phases

Simon Lotz, Teja Kattenborn, Julian Frey, Salim Soltani, Anna Göritz, Tom Jakszat, and Negin Katal

Abstract. Leaf area index (LAI) is a key parameter for modeling ecosystem productivity, climate interactions, and hydrological processes, as well as monitoring vegetation health. While satellite-based estimates provide insights into large-scale vegetation dynamics, ground-based methods, including digital hemispherical photography (DHP), are essential to generate and validate such products and offer a practical alternative for fine-scale assessments. However, it remains unclear if the DHP method enables to robustly track temporal LAI dynamics. Here, we evaluate DHP-derived LAI time series with litter trap (LT)-derived LAI in a temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest. First, by comparing DHP-derived LAI estimates with LT-derived LAI across varying view zenith angles ranging from 10° to 90°, we investigate how well both methods align. Using 15 sample locations, we found the highest average correlation across all locations of DHP- and LT-derived LAI (R2 =0.88) at a view zenith angle of 20°, indicating that litter traps represent a relatively narrow spatial footprint. Uncertainties for individual litter traps attributed to varying site conditions, such as tree stem density or canopy coverage. To overcome these uncertainties, we applied a site specific calibration using the litter traps and a generalized linear mixed model, which significantly increased correlation (R2 =0.97).

This study highlights the potential of DHP for tracking spatio-temporal LAI dynamics in decideous forests. Moreover, we demonstrate that integrating DHP and LT data, alongside a mixed-effects model, can enhance the site specific accuracy and applicability of LAI assessments.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Simon Lotz, Teja Kattenborn, Julian Frey, Salim Soltani, Anna Göritz, Tom Jakszat, and Negin Katal

Status: open (until 20 Jul 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1496', Hongliang Fang, 26 May 2025 reply
    • AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Simon Lotz, 03 Jun 2025 reply
Simon Lotz, Teja Kattenborn, Julian Frey, Salim Soltani, Anna Göritz, Tom Jakszat, and Negin Katal
Simon Lotz, Teja Kattenborn, Julian Frey, Salim Soltani, Anna Göritz, Tom Jakszat, and Negin Katal

Viewed

Total article views: 143 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
101 34 8 143 6 6
  • HTML: 101
  • PDF: 34
  • XML: 8
  • Total: 143
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 141 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 141 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
Digital hemispherical photography (DHP) is a valuable tool for monitoring leaf area index (LAI), a key factor in ecosystem productivity and climate interactions. We compared DHP with litter traps in a temperate forest and found that at a 20° view angle, both methods aligned well. We applied a calibration model to assess site variability which significantly improved accuracy. Our findings enhance the reliability of ground-based LAI monitoring, supporting better ecosystem assessments.
Share