Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1410
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1410
09 May 2025
 | 09 May 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Field Observations Reveal Substantially Higher Scattering Refractive Index in Secondary Versus Primary Organic Aerosols

Junlin Shen, Li Liu, Fengling Yuan, Biao Luo, Hongqing Qiao, Miaomiao Zhai, Gang Zhao, Hanbing Xu, Fei Li, Yu Zou, Tao Deng, Xuejiao Deng, and Ye Kuang

Abstract. Aerosol-radiation interactions play a crucial role in air pollution and climate change with scattering being the dominant process. The complex refractive index of organic aerosols is essential for accurately simulating these interactions, with the scattering capability is predominantly determined by the real part of the refractive index (mr). Prevailing models often assume a constant mr for organic aerosols (e.g., 1.53 or 1.45) at different wavelengths or claim that mr of primary organic aerosols (POA) is substantially higher than that of secondary organic aerosols (SOA) (e.g., 1.63 for POA and 1.43 for SOA), largely due to a lack of direct measurements. This study employs direct measurements from the DMA-SP2 system to demonstrate a strong diameter dependence of dry state mat 1064 nm, closely associated with primary aerosol emissions and secondary aerosol formation. Source apportionment of aerosol size distributions reveals that the mr of SOA is substantially higher than that of POA. Optical closure calculations, based on extensive dry state observations of aerosol scattering at 525 nm, size distributions, and chemical compositions, confirm this finding. These results challenge existing model assumptions. In addition, further analysis reveals mr of SOA increases with oxidation level, which is contrary to results of most laboratory studies on evolution of mr of SOA, which is likely associated with multiphase SOA formation. Our analysis recommends mr values at 525 nm of 1.37 for POA and 1.59 for SOA. These findings underscore that current modeling practices may introduce substantial inaccuracies in estimating the radiative effects of organic aerosols.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Junlin Shen, Li Liu, Fengling Yuan, Biao Luo, Hongqing Qiao, Miaomiao Zhai, Gang Zhao, Hanbing Xu, Fei Li, Yu Zou, Tao Deng, Xuejiao Deng, and Ye Kuang

Status: open (until 20 Jun 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Junlin Shen, Li Liu, Fengling Yuan, Biao Luo, Hongqing Qiao, Miaomiao Zhai, Gang Zhao, Hanbing Xu, Fei Li, Yu Zou, Tao Deng, Xuejiao Deng, and Ye Kuang
Junlin Shen, Li Liu, Fengling Yuan, Biao Luo, Hongqing Qiao, Miaomiao Zhai, Gang Zhao, Hanbing Xu, Fei Li, Yu Zou, Tao Deng, Xuejiao Deng, and Ye Kuang

Viewed

Total article views: 78 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
62 12 4 78 8 2 2
  • HTML: 62
  • PDF: 12
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 78
  • Supplement: 8
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 May 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 88 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 88 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 May 2025
Download
Short summary
This study provides direct observational evidence that secondary organic aerosols have substantially higher real refractive indices than primary organic aerosols, challenging current model assumptions and offering recommended values that improve the accuracy of aerosol radiative effect simulations.
Share