Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1370
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1370
03 Apr 2025
 | 03 Apr 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geochronology (GChron).

Deglaciation of the Sierra Nevada (USA) during Heinrich Event 1

Richard A. Becker, Aaron M. Barth, Shaun A. Marcott, Basil Tikoff, and Marc W. Caffee

Abstract. A polar jet stream (PJS) split by the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) is a well-established feature of Ice-Age atmospheric circulation. California’s central Sierra Nevada Mountains (37–38° N) lie near the reconstructed position of the PJS’s southern branch. Previous studies concluded that rapid deglaciation began here at ca. 16–15 ka after millennia of relatively stability at ~60 % LGM length. However, this conclusion is largely based on the behavior of glaciers in a single valley, Bishop Creek Canyon. We report 31 new 10Be samples from two new locations – Lyell Canyon and Mono Creek Canyon – and 26 recalculated 36Cl dates from Bishop Creek Canyon (n = 57). These dates indicate rapid deglaciation began at 16.4 ± 0.8 ka and lasted for ca. 1.0 kyr. Placing two previously published paleoenvironmental reconstructions (Swamp Lake and McLean’s Cave) with centennial-or-better-scale resolution on new age-depth models that provide age-uncertainty estimates, we find evidence for warming in the central Sierra Nevada at 16.4 ± 0.4 ka and drying at 16.20 ± 0.13 ka. Collectively, we interpret that rapid deglaciation began at 16.20 ± 0.13 ka. This timing is indistinguishable from that of Heinrich Event 1 (HE1), which occurred between 16.22 ± 0.04 ka and 16.04 ± 0.04 ka. We hypothesize that the Sierra Nevada’s deglaciation was driven by a northward repositioning and focusing of the winter-storm track over western North America in response to PJS reunification, bringing warmer and drier weather to the central Sierra Nevada, and that PJS reunification occurred in response HE1 thinning the LIS.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Richard A. Becker, Aaron M. Barth, Shaun A. Marcott, Basil Tikoff, and Marc W. Caffee

Status: open (until 21 May 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Richard A. Becker, Aaron M. Barth, Shaun A. Marcott, Basil Tikoff, and Marc W. Caffee
Richard A. Becker, Aaron M. Barth, Shaun A. Marcott, Basil Tikoff, and Marc W. Caffee

Viewed

Total article views: 111 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
80 25 6 111 6 4 4
  • HTML: 80
  • PDF: 25
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 111
  • Supplement: 6
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Apr 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Apr 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 110 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 110 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
We report 31 new 10Be and 26 recalculated 36Cl dates from the Sierra Nevada Mountains (USA) and conclude that deglaciation’s final and rapid phase began at 16.4 ± 0.8 ka. In comparing this timing with high-resolution regional paleoclimate proxies, we interpret that rapid deglaciation most likely began at 16.20 ± 0.13 ka, which is indistinguishable in timing from Heinrich Event 1. We interpret that the range’s deglaciation was likely driven by a reunification of the polar jet stream at this time.
Share