the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluating reanalysis representations of climatological trace gas distributions in the Asian monsoon tropopause layer
Abstract. Trace gas distributions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) have important radiative and chemical impacts on climate. Although researchers have traditionally shunned direct outputs from reanalysis products at these altitudes, a looming gap in satellite observations may soon render these products essential. Here we use data from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) and five meteorological and composition-focused reanalyses to address two questions: Can current reanalyses reproduce essential features of UTLS composition above the Asian summer monsoon (ASM)? If so, do they reproduce these distributions from internal physics or depend on data assimilation? All evaluated reanalyses capture regional water vapor anomalies despite moist biases in the zonal mean. Reanalysis water vapor budgets reveal the expected balance between advective hydration and ‘cold trap’ dehydration near the cold point; however, data assimilation effects are also influential. The scientific utility of reanalysis water vapor fields at these altitudes could be enhanced by suppressing assimilation effects to facilitate the dominant ‘advection–condensation’ balance, as is now done by ECMWF. The two reanalyses that provide CO show good agreement with observed convective enhancement, highlighting the value of including CO-like transport tracers in reanalyses. All five reanalyses also reproduce the seasonal ‘ozone valley’ above the monsoon, at least qualitatively, but the only reanalysis to provide a complete ozone budget relies heavily on data assimilation to do so. The composition reanalyses, with more sophisticated chemistry, provide a better match to ozone observations, but it remains unclear whether they can do so without Aura MLS.
- Preprint
(3639 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2319 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 26 Mar 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-135', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Mar 2025
reply
This paper evaluates the performance of five atmospheric reanalyses (ERA5, JRA-3Q, MERRA-2, M2-SCREAM, and CAMS) in representing the climatological distributions of trace gases (water vapor, ozone, and carbon monoxide) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) above the Asian summer monsoon (ASM). The study uses data from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) satellite observations to assess how well these reanalyses capture the seasonal and regional variations of trace gases. The paper also investigates the roles of advection, physical processes, and data assimilation in shaping these distributions.. The manuscript can be accepted for publication, however I have few comments which are mentioned below
(1) To look into the seasonal evolution of tracers in the UTLS from prior to monsoon to post monsoon you have considered the period from May to October. However, majority of the studies mainly focussed on the chemical composition within ASMA between July and August corresponding to peak monsoon months (or June to September). Why did you consider the zonal anomalies of the PCW, PCO3 and PCCO from May to October.
(2) There is a shift in the bias (both for O3 and WV) in all the reanalysis compared to MLS which has limitations due to the coarser vertical resolution. Is the vertical resolution in all the reanalysis used in this study are nearly same?
(3) For better clarity in the interest of readers, it would be useful if you mention in the figure caption what the values in the square brackets represent, though you have mentioned in the body of the manuscript.
(4) What could be the possible reasons for the negative and positive tendencies in the water vapor over the southern and northern part of the Tibetan Plateau? Which dominate (physics, advection, assimilation)?
Lastly, I would suggest to write many simpler sentences when much information has to be conveyed so that it would be easy for the readers.
Thank you
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-135-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jonathon Wright, 26 Mar 2025
reply
We thank the reviewer for their comments and suggestions. Please see the attached reply for detailed responses.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jonathon Wright, 26 Mar 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
96 | 26 | 7 | 129 | 14 | 7 | 6 |
- HTML: 96
- PDF: 26
- XML: 7
- Total: 129
- Supplement: 14
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 63 | 39 |
Germany | 2 | 28 | 17 |
China | 3 | 13 | 8 |
United Kingdom | 4 | 10 | 6 |
India | 5 | 8 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 63