Modeling Supercritical CO2 Flow and Mineralization in Reactive Host Rocks with PFLOTRAN v7.0
Abstract. Understanding the flow and reactivity of CO2 injected into geologic reservoirs is important for many subsurface applications including secure geologic carbon storage (GCS), critical mineral extraction, enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), and enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Traditionally, subsurface CO2 injection for GCS applications has focused on geologic formations with favorable subsurface configurations for CO2 migration and trapping through non-reactive mechanisms such as structural, solubility, and petrophysical trapping to isolate CO2 in the subsurface. Recently, CO2-reactive rocks such as mafic and ultramafic basalts have been investigated for their potential to react with injected CO2 in situ to simultaneously dissolve host rock minerals and mineralize CO2 as carbonates. Engineering rapid CO2 mineralization in the subsurface is attractive because of the increased density of stored CO2, the additional safety factors associated with solidification, and the potential to extract valuable critical minerals. However, the limited availability of tools that are capable of modeling the associated coupled multiphase flow and reactive transport processes, especially at scale, makes it difficult to predict the long term behavior of a commercial-scale CO2 injection into a reactive host rock. Here we present recent developments in the parallel flow and reactive transport simulator PFLOTRAN to model coupled CO2-brine flow and reactive transport for a wide range of injection and production applications involving reactive CO2-brine systems. These developments are based on the well established and trusted CO2 flow capabilities in the STOMP-CO2 simulator. New capabilities added to PFLOTRAN include new CO2-brine equations of state with optional thermal coupling, several new constitutive relationships like capillary pressure smoothing and scanning path hysteresis, a fully implicit well model, and native linkage with PFLOTRAN’s well-established reactive transport libraries. A series of numerical benchmarks between PFLOTRAN and STOMP-CO2 verify the newly developed CO2-brine flow capabilities, and demonstrations of coupled CO2-brine flow modeling and reactive transport show how CO2 mineralization can be engineered in reactive host rocks. Finally, an example use case involving copper leaching by CO2 and critical mineral extraction is presented to showcase the strengths of this new implementation. Several limitations still remain, including limited availability of field data to parameterize models. Future work should constrain the evolution of mineral surface area during mineralization and the temperature/pH dependence of geochemical reactions for specific systems of interest.
General comments
Very good research on flow and transport of fluids in geological media. Please, see the specific comments to improve your manuscript.
Specific comments
Line 24. I would enlarge the views to the flow and reactive transport of contaminants in geological media in your introduction.
Line 41. Here, the parallel with flow and transport of contaminants given the fact that you also mention the Darcy and the Fick laws (later in the methodology). Please, insert the parallel with groundwater flow with caprocks vs. aquitard/aquitude, and PFLOTRAN vs. PHREEQC/MT3DMS. See literature below on this parallel where CO2 storage is discussed:
- Medici, G., Munn, J.D., Parker, B.L. 2024. Delineating aquitard characteristics within a Silurian dolostone aquifer using high-density hydraulic head and fracture datasets. Hydrogeology Journal 32, 1663-1691.
- Steel L., Mackay E., Maroto-Valter M.M. 2018. Experimental investigation of CO2-brine-calcite interactions under reservoir conditions. Fuel Processing Technology 169, 122-131.
Line 50. Specify the 3 to 4 objectives of your research by using numbers (e.g., i, ii, and iii).
Line 97. “Advective fluxes”, I would also mention laminar flow either here or in the introduction.
Line 755. Very interesting paragraph. There is a small contrast with part of the title “host rock”. Please, provide explanation for this issue.
Figures and tables
Figure 1. Do you need an approximate spatial scale?
Figure 2. Do you need a spatial scale?
Figure 7. By contrast, I can see cells with a spatial scale in this figure.
Figure 8. Important output. You can move PFLOTRAN and STOMP on the right to gain space, and make the figure larger.
Figure 10. Same here. You can move PFLOTRAN and STOMP on the right to gain space, and make the figure larger.
Figure 11. Do you need a scale bar for your reservoir?