| 09 Apr 2025
Towards family-friendly conferences in the geosciences: results from a first survey
Abstract. In the geoscientific field, building an academic career requires a high level of dedication to research, frequent publishing, and maintaining visibility within the academic community. Conferences are the central platforms for networking and knowledge exchange, making them keystones for a scientific career. However, the early stages of an academic career often coincide with family planning considerations. Many young researchers face the challenge of balancing professional responsibilities with family obligations. A balancing act that becomes particularly difficult during non-routine work events such as conferences. Such occasions tend to pose significant organizational challenges for families. As mothers still perform most caregiving, they are disproportionately affected. This conflict is an important factor inhibiting the rise of women through the academic career ladder. Hence, increasing the family friendliness of conferences holds a chance of diversifying the community, allowing more women to participate, while reducing the tension of the academic work-family conflict.
In this work, we present the results from an online survey among researchers from the geoscientific field. The required support of parents at conferences is analyzed and the acceptance of researchers without children for the implementation of new support offers is examined. Our key findings are that (1) parents wish for more support at conferences, (2) the majority of non-parents welcome family-friendly measures and (3) conference organizers can accomplish a lot in this respect with small adjustments. The responses we received from parents paint a qualitative picture of measures that can be taken to create a family-friendly conference experience, ranging from an increase of transparency and awareness for the challenges of parents to tangible offers like childcare and financial funding. This feedback invites conference organizers to join the conversation about family support and shows that new measures have great support in the geoscientific community. Our findings are distilled into guidelines for conference organizers, allowing them to better address the work-family conflict and transform their conferences towards more equity, diversity and inclusion.
Thank you for this much needed and insightful article. In the discussion (lines 304-306) you note that there is on the one hand an absence of detailed demographic data on the global scientific community and also that due to the distribution methods of the survey there is a strong emphasis on Europe and Germany. It would be helpful if the authors could include recommendations for future studies to capture perspectives on the family-friendliness of conferences globally and perhaps how they would improve their survey design and sampling methods.