the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A new look at reflection seismic data from the Central Caledonian Transect across the Scandinavian Peninsula
Abstract. This study revisits seismic reflection data from the central Scandinavian Caledonides, initially acquired during campaigns in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Previous analyses faced challenges in merging and imaging due to varying trace spacing and data gaps, particularly in the western parts. To address these limitations, we spatially resampled the data to a consistent trace spacing, carefully merged segments, and migrated the entire merged section. This approach resulted in a revised seismic profile, with notable changes in the western section where the image reveals key differences compared to earlier interpretations. The updated profile indicates near-continuous reflections across merged segments, resolving issues of abrupt breaks present in some prior publications. Enhanced imaging in the western section unveils new structural details, including collapsed diffractions and shorter reflective segments, offset from one another. These reflecting segments in the Skardöra antiform are interpreted as representing dolerite sills that were once continuous over a larger area, but have been offset by normal faulting. This reinterpretation suggests a significantly thinner Upper Allochthon in the west than in previous interpretations. These results emphasize the importance of careful data integration and migration for seismic interpretation, shedding new light on the structural complexity of the western Scandinavian Caledonides. The study contributes to refining geological models and advancing understanding of the region's tectonic history.
- Preprint
(4360 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(43947 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 13 May 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1196', Andrew Calvert, 15 Apr 2025
reply
Deep seismic reflection profiling of the continental crust has been taking place for more than 50 years, and many of the early profiles are unlikely to be reacquired due to cost, changing environmental requirements and growing infrastructure. So it is important to preserve in a digital format as much of the early data as possible so that they can be easily displayed and subject to modern coherency enhancement techniques. In their short, well-organized paper, Juhlin et al. combine results from multiple short profiles across the Scandinavian Caledonides to create a new more readily interpreted section than previous results that will aid future workers in the area. My main suggestion is that greater support be provided using an additional blowup figure for the interpretation and the identification of downward drag of reflections near the Steinfjell fault, which I cannot see in the compressed Figure 7. If it is a significant improvement, it would also be helpful to include an additional coherency filtered version of Figure 6, which should be possible since the recovered data are now all in a digital format.
I have a few other additional suggested changes, questions and comments as indicated below:
40: Is the direction of subduction known?
41: Citation needed for “returned and thrust onto Baltica”
47: What is meant by serpentiized gabbros? Surely you mean peridotites or metamorphosed gabbros?
Table 1: No lengths included for line segments I and J
84: Should there be a reference for CSDG?
142: subhorizontal instead of “fairly horizontal”?
146: Change to “but noting that when interpreted the upper 2.5 s”
148: Change to “ probably because the faults”
149: I assume the migration and depth conversion velocity functions are the same here.
Figure 5 caption: Single stacked section of merged segments A to C and E to J as described in the text
Figure 6 caption: Migrated and depth converted section of the stacked data in Figure 5.
165: (top- to-the-east) doesn’t necessarily define thrusting. Best to be explicit about reverse motion if that is what you mean.
165: Label W-dipping reflection on figure so they can be clearly identified in the text.
173, 176: I was unable to locate the downward drag or bending near the fault (see earlier comment).
Figure 7: Include legend for K, SF, BMA, BUA and any abbreviations used.
227: insert line spacing before Gee et al reference
261: insert line spacing before Lehnert et al reference
271-278: There are two Lescoutre et al (2022) references. I assume they should be noted as 2022a and 2022b in reference list and text.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1196-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
64 | 16 | 4 | 84 | 75 | 6 | 5 |
- HTML: 64
- PDF: 16
- XML: 4
- Total: 84
- Supplement: 75
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1