the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Increased surface water evaporation loss induced by reservoir development on the Loess Plateau
Abstract. Global-scale reservoir construction has significantly enhanced local water supply for local production and livelihoods, yet the evaporation losses from these surface water bodies remain poorly understood, particularly in the context of climate change. The majority of existing studies have predominantly focused on terrestrial evaporation, overlooking the intricate evaporation dynamics within these aquatic systems. This study addresses this gap by investigating water body evaporation in the Loess Plateau of China, a region characterized by extensive reservoir development over the past decades. By employing a modified Penman equation and utilizing long-term remote sensing water body data to calculate water depths while accounting for the thermal storage capacity of water bodies, we estimated water evaporation rates and total evaporation volumes for the period 2000–2018. Validation against pan evaporation observations demonstrates the efficacy of our improved approach in capturing the evaporation patterns of diverse water bodies in the Loess Plateau. Results reveal a subtle decreasing trend in evaporation rates across the region. However, the total evaporation volume amounts to a substantial 4.16×106 m3/d, with a notable upward trend at a rate of 0.117×106 m3/d/yr. Attribution analysis shows that while the combined effects of climate change marginally reduced evaporation rates, the expansion of water bodies has counteracted this trend, resulting in a significant increase in total evaporation losses. Particularly, the development of small- and medium-sized reservoirs and check dams is the primary driver of increased evaporation losses on the Loess Plateau. Given comparable evaporation losses to surface water withdrawals in this region, future water management and hydraulic projects must consider such substantial losses. This study fills gaps in evaporation dynamics and underscores the need for integrated strategies addressing climate change, reservoir expansion, and evaporation.
- Preprint
(6654 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-11', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Apr 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Xianhong Xie, 11 May 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-11', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Apr 2025
Liu et al. improved the Penman equation by considering water depth to calculate evaporation rate and volume for the Loess Plateau. They also performed an attribution analysis using climate, radiation, and area factors. They found that while evaporation rates decreased, the evaporation volume showed an increasing trend. Their analysis suggested that the increase in water body area offset the decrease in evaporation rates, leading to an overall increase in regional evaporation. This work provides an interesting and novel perspective on the causes of changes in regional evaporation. However, the manuscript still requires some revisions, as detailed below:
Major Comments:
- In arid and semi-arid regions, such as the Loess Plateau, a large number of small water bodies change relatively quickly. Can the lag time in equations 4 and 5 adequately account for the impact of the variation of small water bodies?
- The resolution used for the attribution analysis is coarser than the previous spatiotemporal results. How was the resolution conversion handled?
- How much improvement in accuracy does the modified method provide compared to the Penman equation that does not consider water depth?
- It would be beneficial to include comparisons with results from other regions in the discussion. For instance, the introduction mentions examples from the U.S. and the Tibetan Plateau, where changes in water body area due to climate change differ from the human-induced expansion of water bodies on the Loess Plateau.
- The writing could be more concise. There are unnecessary explanations in the results, such as on pages 19 (lines 4-12, which should be moved to the discussion or removed), 25 (lines 3-7, which should be moved to the discussion), 22 (lines 9-11, recommended for removal), 23 (lines 2-4, recommended for removal), and 26 (lines 2-5, which can be shortened).
- In the second paragraph of the introduction, the examples from the U.S. and the Tibetan Plateau focus on climate-driven changes in water area, which ultimately cause changes in ET. It would be more appropriate to use examples of human-induced changes in water area.
- The section describing the study area should include an overview of ET in this area.
Minor Comments:
- In Fig. 1a, the legend for "River" should be a line; in Fig. 1b, the text is too small. Also, there are capitalization errors in the figure title.
- Validation metrics such as R², RMSE, and Bias should be briefly explained in the methods section, after the evaporation pan data description, without listing the formulas.
- Page 19, line 2. The full forms of R² and RMSE have already been provided in lines 6 of page 18, so there is no need to repeat them.
- In Figs. 3 and 4, it is recommended to label R², RMSE, and Bias on the figures to provide readers with overall validation information.
- In Fig. 5, using the same color for "Pan" and "Big pan" would improve readability. They can be distinguished by different symbols, and it may be better to use darker colors to represent better results.
- In Fig. 6 and 8, it is recommended to use pie charts to show the proportion of area increases and decreases, or frequency distribution charts for each classification.
- How are large, medium, and small water bodies defined?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-11-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Xianhong Xie, 19 May 2025
We are grateful to the distinguished anonymous reviewer for the thoughtful and constructive feedback provided on our manuscript. Our detailed response to the reviewer's comments, including the planned modifications to the manuscript, is attached in the attached file.
Data sets
Land surface water evaporation during 2000-2018 on the Loess Plateau Yao Liu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14963639
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
797 | 124 | 21 | 942 | 19 | 32 |
- HTML: 797
- PDF: 124
- XML: 21
- Total: 942
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 32
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
The manuscript titled ‘Increased surface water evaporation loss induced by reservoir development on the Loess Plateau’ by Yao Liu et al., presents an analysis of evaporation rates and total evaporation volumes from surface water bodies across the Loess Plateau. The study investigates the temporal evolution of these components over the past two decades, explores their spatial distribution, and performs attribution analysis to identify the key drivers of changes in open water evaporation volume.
The objectives of the study are well described, and the results are thoroughly discussed. A key finding of this study is the paradoxical behavior of decreasing evaporation rates, yet with increasing evaporation volume on the Loess Plateau, whereby mainly the increase in area in small- to medium-sized water bodies over the last decades contributed to this increase in evaporation volume.
Below, I provide several comments and suggestions that may help improve the impact of the manuscript:
In addition to this, I have identified several minor comments: