the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Exploring Sources of Ice Crystals in Cirrus Clouds: Comparative Analysis of Two Ice Nucleation Schemes in CAM6
Abstract. Ice nucleation, a critical process in cirrus clouds, remains a challenge in global climate models. To enhance the understanding, a novel ice nucleation parameterization based on the Kärcher (2022) (K22) scheme is introduced into the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6).
To investigate ice formation in cirrus clouds, sensitivity tests are conducted to analyze three ice sources: orographic gravity wave (OGW)-induced, convection detrained and turbulence-induced. These tests employ both the K22 scheme and the default Liu and Penner (2005) (LP05) scheme. Model evaluation includes 6-year climatology and nudged simulations representing the Small Particles in Cirrus (SPARTICUS) and O2/N2 Ratio and CO2 Airborne Southern Ocean Study (ORCAS) campaigns.
The climatology simulations reveal that both schemes concentrate detrained and turbulence-induced ice crystals in low to mid-latitudes, whereas OGW-induced ice crystals are concentrated in mid- to high latitudes. Compared to the LP05 scheme, the K22 scheme generates a higher number of ice crystals. The simulated cloud microphysical properties using the K22 scheme align well with observations for orographic cirrus during the SPARTICUS campaign.
In orographic cirrus, both schemes identify OGW-induced ice crystals as the dominant ice source. However, due to distinct competition parameterizations, the K22 scheme exhibits less competition from minor ice sources (convection detrained and turbulence-induced). This underscores the significance of competition mechanisms within nucleation schemes for accurate cirrus clouds simulation. The application of two distinct nucleation schemes provides valuable insights into the dominant ice sources in cirrus clouds.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(2031 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(891 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4144', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Mar 2025
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Kai Lyu, 27 Jun 2025
We thank the anonymous reviewer for the constructive comments. Below, we explain how the comments are addressed and make notes of the revisions in the revised manuscript. The reviewer’ comments are in blue color. Our replies are in black, and our corresponding revisions in the manuscript are in red (line numbers are based on the tracked version of the revised manuscript).
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Kai Lyu, 27 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4144', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Mar 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Kai Lyu, 27 Jun 2025
We thank the anonymous reviewer for the constructive comments. Below, we explain how the comments are addressed and make notes of the revisions in the revised manuscript. The reviewer’ comments are in blue color. Our replies are in black, and our corresponding revisions in the manuscript are in red (line numbers are based on the tracked version of the revised manuscript).
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Kai Lyu, 27 Jun 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
496 | 68 | 21 | 585 | 31 | 16 | 33 |
- HTML: 496
- PDF: 68
- XML: 21
- Total: 585
- Supplement: 31
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 33
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1