the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The effect of organic nucleation on the indirect radiative forcing with a semi-explicit chemical mechanism for highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs)
Abstract. Highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) can significantly contribute to new particle formation (NPF). HOMs-derived NPF in preindustrial (PI) environments provides the baseline for calculating radiative forcing, yet global model studies examining this are lacking. Here, we use a global climate model with a semi-explicit HOMs chemistry and the associated nucleation scheme to systematically quantify the effect of HOMs-derived NPF on CCN formation and effective radiative forcing due to aerosol–cloud interactions (ERFaci). The improved model shows better agreement with measured cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) numbers. Aerosols generated from organic NPF nearly double the globally averaged CCN burden in PI (39 %) compared to PD (18 %) experiments. This weakens the ERFaci by 0.4 W m-2, corresponding to a 16 % reduction, with most of this reduction occurring in tropical regions where pure organic nucleation rates shows larger value in PI atmosphere. Unlike the findings of Gordon et al. (2016), the reduction is mainly driven by a greater enhancement of the sub-20 nm growth rate (GR) in the PI atmosphere compared to PD instead of the ~1 nm nucleation rate (j1.7nm). The greater enhancement of GR is due to higher HOM concentrations in the PI atmosphere, while the greater j1.7nm in PD environment results from higher sulfuric acid concentrations, leading to higher heteromolecular nucleation rates involving sulfuric acid and organics. The reduction underscores the critical role of biogenic NPF in CCN formation, particularly in the PI climate when cloud droplet concentrations and albedo are more sensitive to aerosol changes.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(2970 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4033 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4135', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Mar 2025
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-4135', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Mar 2025
-
RC3: 'Comment on Shao et al.', Anonymous Referee #3, 31 Mar 2025
The manuscript addresses a significant knowledge gap regarding the role of highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) in new particle formation (NPF) during the preindustrial era, which is critical for establishing accurate baseline conditions for radiative forcing calculations. The implementation of a semi-explicit HOMs chemistry scheme (in CAM6-Chem) represents a significant improvement compared to the simplified fixed-yield approaches. A very interesting finding is that the condensational growth (before Aitken mode particles are formed) rather than nucleation itself is the primary driver of CCN enhancement in preindustrial conditions. The manuscript is well written, with great supporting materials that help the readers to better understand the results. On the other hand, I think the manuscript could be further improved in the following aspects:
1) The manuscript identifies enhanced growth rates of small particles in the PI atmosphere as the primary driver for increased CCN concentrations and subsequent reduction in ERFaci. Since the impact of new treatment on sub-20nm particle growth under preindustrial (PI) conditions is one of the key findings of this study, it would be beneficial to include more analysis and discussion on this topic in the main text. For example, it would be useful to present figure S13 (panels c,d) and corresponding results for "PI_Inorg" and compare the growth rates between the two cases under PD&PI conditions. If there are model diagnostics of condensation rates by sulfuric acid gas and by organics, it would be valuable to compare them.
2) The present study discusses the impact of the new nucleation treatment on indirect aerosol effect. It would be more meaningful to also present total effective aerosol forcing changes (either in figure or table), in addition to the decomposed values, since there are often compensating effects between different forcing components.
3) Since the authors claim (line 284 and 316) that the CCN burden change and the indirect aerosol effect are mainly caused by ORGANIC condensational growth on sub-20nm particles, it would be useful to isolate this impact by performing an additional simulation with the organic condensational growth switched off (if it is straightforward). Otherwise, I would suggest stating it as "likely" or removing the emphasis on organics condensation.
Specific comments:
Figure 3: Is CDNC either vertically-integrated or at the top of low clouds? Which is correct?
Figure 4: Why are the values over ocean negative in panels a) and b)? Also, the caption is somewhat confusing. I suggest rewriting it.
Figure 6: It would be more meaningful to also present total effective aerosol forcing changes (either in figure or table), in addition to the decomposed values. There are often compensating effects between different forcing components.
Line 176: Should be Table 2.
Line 198: "rise" → "rises"
Line 220: "comparing to" → "compared to"
Line 230-231: Is this really the case in this study? It appears that the accumulation mode aerosol number concentrations have significant changes after considering organic nucleation.
Line 280: "organics rate" → "organics"
Line 295: Delete "was neglected"
Line 318: "is" → "are"
Line 324: Should be Figure 6 (not 9).
Line 325: "higher increase" → "greater increase"
Line 337: "with a greater reduction than estimated in previous studies." This appears inconsistent with Gordon et al.'s higher percentage reduction (27%) than this study (16%).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4135-RC3
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
149 | 45 | 8 | 202 | 25 | 4 | 6 |
- HTML: 149
- PDF: 45
- XML: 8
- Total: 202
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 80 | 40 |
China | 2 | 30 | 15 |
Brazil | 3 | 12 | 6 |
Germany | 4 | 12 | 6 |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7 | 3 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 80