Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4029
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4029
22 Jan 2025
 | 22 Jan 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Physical Protection of Soil Carbon Stocks Under Regenerative Agriculture

Sam G. Keenor, Rebekah Lee, and Brian J. Reid

Abstract. Regenerative agriculture is emerging as a strategy for carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation. However, for sequestration efforts to be successful, long-term stabilisation of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) is needed. This can be achieved either through the uplift in recalcitrant carbon stocks, and/or through physical protection and occlusion of carbon within stable soil aggregates. In this research, soils from blackcurrant fields under regenerative management (0 to 7 years) were analysed with respect to: soil bulk density (SBD), aggregate fractionation (water stable aggregates vs. non-water stable aggregates (WSA and NWSA respectively)), soil carbon content, and carbon stability (recalcitrant vs. labile carbon). From this, long term carbon sequestration potential was calculated from both recalcitrant and physically occluded carbon stocks (stabilised carbon). Results indicated favourable shifts in the proportion of NWSA:WSA with time. This ratio increasing from 27.6 % : 5.8 % (control soil) to 12.6 % : 16.0 % (alley soil), and 16.1 % : 14.4 % (bush soil) after 7 years. While no significant (p ≥ 0.05)) changes in recalcitrant carbon stocks were observed after 7 years, labile carbon stocks increased significantly (p ≤ 0.05) from 10.44 t C ha-1 to 13.87 t C ha-1. As a result, total sequesterable carbon (stabilised carbon) increased by 1.7 t C ha-1 over the 7 year period, due to the occlusion and protection of this labile carbon stock within WSA fraction. This research provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of soil carbon stabilisation under regenerative agriculture practices and highlights the importance of soil aggregates in physically protecting carbon net-gains.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Sam G. Keenor, Rebekah Lee, and Brian J. Reid

Status: open (until 05 Mar 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sam G. Keenor, Rebekah Lee, and Brian J. Reid
Sam G. Keenor, Rebekah Lee, and Brian J. Reid

Viewed

Total article views: 96 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
77 15 4 96 12 1 1
  • HTML: 77
  • PDF: 15
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 96
  • Supplement: 12
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 59 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 59 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
Regenerative soil management reduced bulk density, increased carbon stocks, and influenced aggregate stability with time. Soils were observed to become proportionally more enriched in stable aggregates over time, and to store more carbon. These stable aggregates were found to provide physical protection to labile carbon stocks. When considered alongside recalcitrant carbon, these carbon stabilisation mechanisms may provide further opportunities to deliver robust carbon sequestration.