the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
On the seasonal variability of ocean heat transport and ice shelf melt around Antarctica
Abstract. The delivery of ocean heat to Antarctic ice shelves is due to intrusions of waters warmer than the local freezing point temperature. Changes in the supply of ocean heat will determine how rapidly ice shelves melt at their base, which affects Antarctic Ice Sheet mass loss and future global mean sea level rise. However, processes driving ice shelf basal melting are still poorly understood. Here we investigate the drivers of heat convergence along the Antarctic margins by performing an ocean heat budget analysis using a high-fidelity 4 km circum-Antarctic ocean–ice-shelf model. The simulation produces high basal melting in West Antarctica associated with sustained ocean heat convergence driven by advection of relatively warm deep water intrusions, with minimal seasonality in both heat supply and basal melting. For East Antarctica, ice shelves have substantial basal melt seasonality, driven by strong air-sea winter cooling over the continental shelf depressing shallow melting, while in summer, increased heat inflow towards the ice shelves is driven by surface-warmed waters that subduct under shallow regions of ice, increasing melt. The high seasonality of basal melting in East Antarctic ice shelves is responsive to interactions between the atmospheric forcing, the local icescape, and the activity of polynyas. Our results suggest that seasonal changes in future climate change scenarios are critical in determining the duration and intensity of air-sea fluxes with substantial impacts on ice shelf basal melting and ice sheet and sea level budgets.
- Preprint
(20843 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 23 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3905', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Apr 2025
reply
General comments
In this study the authors produce a pan-Antarctic heat budget using 4km ocean-ice shelf model. They focus on seasonality of this heat transport, with their main results being that ice-shelves in East Antarctica are subject to high seasonality, in contrast to those in West Antarctica. Overall I found this study interesting and easy to follow with clear enough conclusions. While I don’t have any particularly major comments, I do have a number of more minor, which I think require addressing before the manuscript be published.
Specific comments
- After equation 1, I suggest reminding readers that Q_sfc includes latent heat from imposed sea-ice melt/formation. Further, it was never quite clear to me if this also includes heat fluxes associated with ice-shelf melting. Stating whether or not this is case would be appreciated.
- I would suggest including, potentially just as a figure in the appendix, confirmation that the heat budget is closed/accurate. For the ice-shelf cavities, this would require the latent heat flux from melting of ice shelves. Has this been diagnosed in these simulations (from my comment 1, I wasn’t certain it’s part of Q_sfc)? Subtracting this from the timeseries in Fig 1c will lead to a measure of the temporal change in the heat content in the cavities, which can be used as a useful verification of the heat budget itself. If the latent heat flux from ice-shelf melting hasn’t been diagnosed, it could be estimated from the ice-shelf melting itself, but this would have small errors since this is also dependent on the local temperature field.
- L140: “The heat transport term integrated meridionally over the continental shelf describes the effect from the cross-slope heat transport”. There’s also a contribution coming from heat going into/out of the ice shelf cavities.
- L147. “The correlation between the annual mean heat convergence integrated meridionally over the continental shelf and within the ice shelf cavities is indeed low”. Is this the correlation between the black lines in Figs 1c,d? I would imagine advective timescales cause this correlation to be low. I would also imagine that considering lagged correlations wouldn’t help much since the lag would be location-dependent. I suggest adding a sentence describing such potential reasons for the low correlation, and how it doesn’t necessarily such a weak physical relationship between the timeseries.
- L154,155. Can it be clarified what this “spatial correlation” is referring to? My thinking is that it refers to the correlation between instantaneous maps of heat flux convergence in the ice-shelf cavity and ice-shelf melting, which is then averaged over time. Is this correct?
- L196. It’s stated that the grey sections in Fig 1b are based on high basal melt rates, but some areas with high basal melt are not included (e.g., near -20), and some grey regions have low basal melt (e.g., 1st and 8th grey section). Can the authors explain the reasoning for this?
- In section 4 there is some discussion surrounding the use of just one year of model data and associated limitations. I would suggest adding more discussion of how this can also limit confidence in the diagnosed seasonality.
Technical corrections
“Antarctic Ice Sheet” is capitalised in places, but not everywhere.
The phrase “ice-shelf” is hyphenated in instances of “ocean–ice-shelf”, but not elsewhere. I suggest sticking with a consistent choice.
L18. Change “impede” to “impedes”.
L23. Change “climate models outputs” to “climate model output”.
L30. Change “;neither some” to “, nor are some”.
L51. This paragraph repeats much the previous paragraph, e.g., that warm water ice shelves have mode 2 melting etc. This bit of the text could be made a bit briefer.
L79. Specify that these are ice-shelf thermodynamic interactions.
L101. Check the wording of this sentence.
L128. ‘Whereas…” This is not a full sentence.
Fig. 3e,f. Add to the caption the meaning of “<300m” and “>300m” in the legend.
Figs. 4,5. Can either panels b,e (or c,f) be edited to show basal melt anomaly in each season?
L280. Typo: “Totten ice Shelf”.
L289. Typo: “excerce”.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3905-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
148 | 49 | 4 | 201 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 148
- PDF: 49
- XML: 4
- Total: 201
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 56 | 28 |
Australia | 2 | 38 | 19 |
United Kingdom | 3 | 22 | 11 |
France | 4 | 17 | 8 |
Germany | 5 | 13 | 6 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 56