the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Characterization of Free Tropospheric Layers With Polar Radio Occultation Data
Abstract. Polarimetric Radio Occultation (PRO) concurrently detects heavy precipitation, ice, and the vertical thermodynamic structure inside clouds, enhancing traditional radio occultation measurements. We compare cloud top heights (CTOP) defined as the uppermost altitude at which the polarimetric phase difference between the horizontal and vertical components, Δϕ, exceeds 1 mm, for three years of PRO data from the Radio Occultation and Heavy Precipitation (ROHP) experiment, to the local tropical tropopause layer (TTL) base, a minimum stability level determined as the maximum lapse rate height (LRMAX). The TTL base coincides with the 80th – 90th percentiles of CTOP globally. We examine the skill of using the Tropopause Inversion Layer and the minimum vertical gradient of the lapse rate (∂LR/∂z)min to characterize the tropopause compared to the lapse rate and the cold point tropopauses. The TTL thickness, defined as the height of the (∂LR/∂z)min minus the LRMAX, is thinnest over the Tropical Warm Pool where LRMAX and CTOP are deepest. The steepest meridional gradient with latitude of the TTL top height is just equatorward of the subtropical maxima of the frequency of double tropopauses. For tropical raining clouds, when the maximum Δϕ, Δϕmax exceeds 10 mm, the mean binned CTOP is 2.7 km below the mean LRMAX, with a slope of nearly one. Using 0.8 mm for the Δϕ CTOP threshold is optimal, while reducing below 0.8 mm decreases the CTOP and LRMAX spatial correlation. Globally, cloud tops associated with the largest 99th-percentile Δϕmax are 0.4 km above LRMAX.
- Preprint
(2493 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 18 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3898', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Feb 2025
reply
To summarize, this paper considers Earth radio occultation (RO) data obtained by standard RO and by polarimetric RO to explore quantities associated with clouds and the tropopause transition layer (TTL). First, in order to define the TTL vertical boundaries, they construct a new definition of the tropopause that can be used to bound the bottom side of the TTL. They found existing definitions inadequate for their purposes. They apply their definitions and explore the consequences for the TTL, the extent of double-tropopauses, and the depth of the troposphere. Then the authors explore relationships between cloud-top height according to various definitions of differential phase from polarimetric radio occultation (PRO) obtained by the rohp-PAZ mission. They find consistency of some of their results with previous findings by the first author.
I find this paper to be a stream-of-consciousness grab-bag of computations without well-defined purpose or intent, unorganized, abstruse in its presentation, with no interesting conclusion. It’s as if the authors felt required to publish after an initial exploration of data without a coherent idea of why they should publish.
A couple of salient points. These are examples; fixing just these few points should not be construed as a response to this review. Much more serious repair is needed before it is resubmitted.
- The title. The word “characterization” by itself suggests that the authors have no specific goal in mind. The tropopause transition layer is not widely regarded as the “free troposphere”, as it is not free. The authors are using standard GNSS RO and “polarimetric” RO; “polar” RO suggests RO measurements obtained in the Earth’s polar regions.
- No motivation for using polarimetric RO is given. Stand-alone references do not suffice here inasmuch as PRO data are central to the authors' exploration.
- Here is a typical indecipherable sentence (lines 424 – 427): “Though we do not show the full histograms for the Tropical West Pacific (WP: 120°E-160°E; 5°N-15°) or the Tropical East Pacific (EP: 150°W-100°W; 5°N-15°N), we do present the 99th percentile of for each region; the heaviest precipitation of 19.9 mm in the WP is associated with CTOP 0.4 km below LRMAX, while for the EP there’s a peak about 1.2 km below LRMAX and then another one of 21.4 mm at 2.0 km above LRMAX.” There are so many acronyms and sub-clauses that I cannot follow any of it; and this is the topic sentence of a paragraph. Almost every other sentence in the second half of this manuscript is like this.
- The authors show the TTL to extend up to 35 km in polar regions. This is not a serious finding.
- What physics is being tested here? What should we expect to find? I suspect even the simplest thought given to physics would have led the authors to consider an isentropic analysis and relationships to thermodynamic properties of the surface air, especially its equivalent potential temperature. Entropy/potential temperature makes no appearance in this manuscript even though it is considered in one of the classic definitions of the tropopause, especially for studies related to clouds and convection such as this one.
- Lines 369 – 370: A plot (figure 7d) is presented for no reason at all.
- What can I learn from figure 9b? Is there anything interesting here?
- Instead of contriving a brand new definition for the tropopause—maximum derivative of lapse rate—which depends so heavily on a prior step of preprocessing, why not use an atmospheric reanalysis instead? Inasmuch as atmospheric analyses filter out internal gravity waves, which the authors also seek to do, why not at least try to use atmospheric analyses? This could have easily made this paper much more concise and focused.
I very strongly urge a resubmission after the authors consider a wholesale reorganization of their research and presentation.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3898-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
153 | 30 | 10 | 193 | 8 | 9 |
- HTML: 153
- PDF: 30
- XML: 10
- Total: 193
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 76 | 49 |
Germany | 2 | 10 | 6 |
India | 3 | 9 | 5 |
Brazil | 4 | 7 | 4 |
China | 5 | 4 | 2 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 76