the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Intercomparison of IAGOS-CORE, IAGOS-CARIBIC and WMO/GAW-WCCOS Ozone Instruments at the Environmental Simulation Facility at Jülich, Germany
Abstract. In the frame of the Quality Assurance (QA) plan of the In-service Aircraft for a Global Observation System (IAGOS), IAGOS-CORE and IAGOS-CARIBIC UV-photometer instruments have been compared with the dual-beam UV- Ozone (O3) PhotoMeter (OPM) of the World Calibration Center of Ozone Sondes (WCCOS) at the Forschungszentrum Jülich in an environmental simulation chamber. The WCCOS is established as part of the WMO-GAW measurement quality program of the global ozonesonde network for more than 30 years, in which the OPM instrument serves as the ozone reference standard. In the simulation chamber, pressure, temperature, and ozone concentration can be controlled at quasi-realistic flight conditions between the Earth surface (~1000 hPa) and ~35 km altitude (5 hPa). During the intercomparison, different ascent/descent and cruise altitude profiles of ozone, pressure and temperature have been simulated between the surface and ~12 km altitude (200 hPa).
In general, the two O3 instruments P1-O3 (IAGOS-CORE) and CAR-O3 (IAGOS-CARIBIC) showed good agreement with the OPM reference standard within 5–6 %. At a pressure of 400–500 hPa the agreement was even within 2 %. The observed differences are small but systematic and reproducible during this experiment. CAR-O3 showed a small, but pressure independent deviation of -(1.5–2.5) % ± 1.5 % compared to the OPM. P1-O3 revealed O3 deviation to the OPM which changes with pressure of about +2 % at 1000 hPa to -3 % at 400 hPa, which might be an artefact on the experimental set-up and subject for further investigations. This intercomparison is a first step of the long-term goal to get the global ozone sonde data (GAW-NDACC-SHADOZ-GRUAN) and IAGOS-O3 (CORE: P1-O3, CARIBIC: CAR-O3) data traceable to one common reference, the OPM instrument of WCCOS. Recommendations are given for further regular validation of the flown instruments on external consistency in general and specifically towards the synergy of IAGOS-O3 and ozonesonde data.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(7410 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3760', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Feb 2025
reply
Summary:
This paper provides a summary of a number of experiments conducted at the Forschungszentrum Julich (FZJ) atmospheric profile simulation chamber designed to connect the ozone measurements profile measurements made as part of the In-service Aircraft for a Global Observation System (IAGOS) to those made on balloon sondes using the common, world-standard UV calibration instrument of Proffitt et al. (1982). As such this paper is an important contribution to the literature and will allow a harmonization of in situ ozone profiles across these measurement platforms.In particular, the experiments conducted examined the performance of two versions of the aircraft O3 instruments (P1-O3 and CAR-O3) against the dual-beam UV-Ozone Photometer (OPM) of the World Calibration Center of Ozone Sondes (WCCOS) at FZJ. The instruments generally showed agreement to within 5-6% over the range of pressures studied. Interestingly, the P1-O3 instrument showed a consistent trend in offset from the OPM, starting at ~+2% at 1000 hPa and changing linearly to ~ -3% by 400 hPa. The paper was uncertain as to the cause, which does need to be identified and reconciled. It mentions that the performance of this instrument might be an artifact of the experimental set-up. That question should be resolved.
Recommendation:
Publish with relatively minor revisions – see my detailed comments below.
While it would be good to have the question of the drift in the offset of the P1-O3 instrument from the WPM resolved, it is worth getting these results into the literature sooner than later. If it is not resolved by the time of publication of this manuscript, a follow-up “note” should be submitted with an answer to the question.
Detailed comments can be found in the attached supplement file.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
141 | 24 | 6 | 171 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 141
- PDF: 24
- XML: 6
- Total: 171
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 49 | 31 |
United States of America | 2 | 38 | 24 |
France | 3 | 12 | 7 |
China | 4 | 7 | 4 |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 49