Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3664
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3664
09 Jan 2025
 | 09 Jan 2025

Benchmarking and improving algorithms for attributing satellite-observed contrails to flights

Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey

Abstract. Contrail cirrus clouds persisting in ice-supersaturated air cause a substantial fraction of aviation's climate impact. One proposed method for the mitigation of this impact involves modifying flight paths to avoid particular regions of the atmosphere that are conducive to the formation of persistent contrails. Ascertaining which flight formed each observed contrail can be used to assess and improve contrail forecast models, as well as study the effectiveness of performing contrail avoidance. The problem of contrail-to-flight attribution is complicated by several factors, such as the time required for a contrail to become visible in satellite imagery, high air traffic densities and errors in wind data. Recent work has introduced automated algorithms for solving the attribution problem, but lack an evaluation against ground-truth data. In this work, we present a method for producing synthetic contrail observations with predetermined contrail-to-flight attributions which can be used to evaluate – or "benchmark" – and improve such attribution algorithms. The resulting performance metrics can be used to understand the implications of using this observational data in downstream tasks such as forecast model evaluation and analysis of contrail avoidance trials. We also introduce a novel, highly-scalable, contrail-to-flight attribution algorithm that leverages the characteristic compounding of error induced by simulating contrail advection using numerical weather models. The benchmark shows an improvement of about 30 % in precision versus previous contrail-to-flight attribution algorithms, without compromising recall.

Competing interests: Some authors are employees of Google Inc. as noted in their author affiliations. Google is a technology company that sells computing services as part of its business.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3664', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jan 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3664', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Feb 2025
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey

Viewed

Total article views: 250 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
195 49 6 250 5 3
  • HTML: 195
  • PDF: 49
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 250
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 216 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 216 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
Contrails, the linear clouds formed by aircraft, are have a substantial climate impact. Flight deviations to avoid forming contrails should decrease this impact. We introduce a method for matching contrails seen by satellites to the flights that made them. This can determine if avoidance was successful and improve contrail forecasts. We also introduce a synthetic contrail dataset to evaluate the accuracy of the matches. We show that our attributions are much more accurate than previous methods.
Share