Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3664
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3664
09 Jan 2025
 | 09 Jan 2025

Benchmarking and improving algorithms for attributing satellite-observed contrails to flights

Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey

Abstract. Contrail cirrus clouds persisting in ice-supersaturated air cause a substantial fraction of aviation's climate impact. One proposed method for the mitigation of this impact involves modifying flight paths to avoid particular regions of the atmosphere that are conducive to the formation of persistent contrails. Ascertaining which flight formed each observed contrail can be used to assess and improve contrail forecast models, as well as study the effectiveness of performing contrail avoidance. The problem of contrail-to-flight attribution is complicated by several factors, such as the time required for a contrail to become visible in satellite imagery, high air traffic densities and errors in wind data. Recent work has introduced automated algorithms for solving the attribution problem, but lack an evaluation against ground-truth data. In this work, we present a method for producing synthetic contrail observations with predetermined contrail-to-flight attributions which can be used to evaluate – or "benchmark" – and improve such attribution algorithms. The resulting performance metrics can be used to understand the implications of using this observational data in downstream tasks such as forecast model evaluation and analysis of contrail avoidance trials. We also introduce a novel, highly-scalable, contrail-to-flight attribution algorithm that leverages the characteristic compounding of error induced by simulating contrail advection using numerical weather models. The benchmark shows an improvement of about 30 % in precision versus previous contrail-to-flight attribution algorithms, without compromising recall.

Competing interests: Some authors are employees of Google Inc. as noted in their author affiliations. Google is a technology company that sells computing services as part of its business.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

28 Jul 2025
Benchmarking and improving algorithms for attributing satellite-observed contrails to flights
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3495–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3495-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3495-2025, 2025
Short summary
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3664', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jan 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Aaron Sarna, 13 Mar 2025
      • AC3: 'Reply on AC1', Aaron Sarna, 13 Mar 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3664', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Feb 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Aaron Sarna, 13 Mar 2025

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3664', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jan 2025
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Aaron Sarna, 13 Mar 2025
      • AC3: 'Reply on AC1', Aaron Sarna, 13 Mar 2025
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3664', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Feb 2025
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Aaron Sarna, 13 Mar 2025

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Aaron Sarna on behalf of the Authors (24 Mar 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (28 Mar 2025) by Can Li
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (10 Apr 2025)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (16 Apr 2025)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (17 Apr 2025) by Can Li
AR by Aaron Sarna on behalf of the Authors (02 May 2025)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (09 May 2025) by Can Li
AR by Aaron Sarna on behalf of the Authors (14 May 2025)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

28 Jul 2025
Benchmarking and improving algorithms for attributing satellite-observed contrails to flights
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3495–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3495-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3495-2025, 2025
Short summary
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey
Aaron Sarna, Vincent Meijer, Rémi Chevallier, Allie Duncan, Kyle McConnaughay, Scott Geraedts, and Kevin McCloskey

Viewed

Total article views: 657 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
430 212 15 657 15 25
  • HTML: 430
  • PDF: 212
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 657
  • BibTeX: 15
  • EndNote: 25
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 652 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 652 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Jul 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Contrails, the linear clouds formed by aircraft, are have a substantial climate impact. Flight deviations to avoid forming contrails should decrease this impact. We introduce a method for matching contrails seen by satellites to the flights that made them. This can determine if avoidance was successful and improve contrail forecasts. We also introduce a synthetic contrail dataset to evaluate the accuracy of the matches. We show that our attributions are much more accurate than previous methods.
Share