the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Investigating metamodeling capability to predict sea levels and marine flooding maps for early-warning systems: application on the Arcachon Lagoon (France)
Abstract. Marine flooding events during storms are expected to occur more frequently due to sea level rise. Hence, early warning systems (EWS) dedicated to marine flooding are expected to develop in the coming years. In this study, we compare three data-driven methodologies to overcome the computational burden of numerical simulations. They are all based on the statistical analysis of pre-calculated databases, to downscale total sea levels and to predict marine flooding maps from offshore metocean operational forecasts. While the first one is a simple analog-based research from offshore metocean conditions, the next two both use a machine learning type metamodel to predict total sea levels at the coast, and either an analog or a deep-learning approach to predict marine flooding maps. The analysis, carried out with a cross-validation exercise and historical storms on the pilot site of Arcachon lagoon (Southwest of France), reveals that the analog-based approach is a valuable first step to explore the dataset and improve the understanding of flooding phenomena, but lack precision for operational forecast applications. On the other hand, the two metamodel-based approaches are more suitable for fast prediction with a lower prediction error of inland water heights for the deep-learning approach (on the order of 10 cm). Both approaches can then be complementary depending on the type of event, the required level of prediction accuracy to support operational decision making, and the forecast lead time. In this sense, the study also underlines the usefulness of precalculated databases to conduct a preparatory work with crisis managers to determine the type of information and the right level of complexity required to address operational needs.
- Preprint
(3467 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3615', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Nov 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3615/egusphere-2024-3615-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2024-3615-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3615', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Feb 2026
The manuscript addresses a highly relevant topic for the natural hazards and coastal risk community. It makes use of data-driven metamodels as an effort to support operational early warnings for marine flooding. The comparison of analog (M1) and meta-model approaches (M2, M3) is scientifically interesting and potentially valuable for researchers and coastal managers. Furthermore, the study is generally well structured and the outcomes are sufficiently described.
However, in its current form, the manuscript requires further clarifications and editing improvements before considering publication. My main concerns arise from the following aspects:
(1) The authors refer to “overflowing” processes, but the widely accepted term of wave run-up is not introduced or discussed. This aspect should be clarified and integrated into the terminology of the manuscript.
(2) Several aspects of the modeling strategy require clearer justifications, including a brief presentation of the constructed pseudo-historical events. In particular, the construction of pseudo-historical events should be better described, including the ranges of forcing parameters. Furthermore,
(3) The extraction of the surge level (SPM ) parameter took place at the location of the buoy located offshore (at 50 m deoth) and not at the tide gauge located at the nearshore.
(4) M3 method should be more clearly framed as a refinement or extension of M2, mainly improving the spatial reconstruction of flood depths rather than the prediction of flood extent or impact category.
(5) The inclusion of 1000-year return period storm scenarios raise concerns, given the the limited observational basis and uncertainties of the hydrodynamic parameters, and thus should be reconsidered.
(6) Use of terminology, technical specifications and text editing.
Once these issues are adequately addressed, I believe that the study could be a meaningful contribution to the coastal hazards literature. For this purpose, detailed commentary is provided to the authors (see supplement).
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,538 | 117 | 41 | 1,696 | 38 | 46 |
- HTML: 1,538
- PDF: 117
- XML: 41
- Total: 1,696
- BibTeX: 38
- EndNote: 46
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1