Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3596
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3596
13 Jan 2025
 | 13 Jan 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

The Solar Zenith Angle Impacts MODIS versus CALIPSO AOD Retrieval Biases, with Implications for Arctic Aerosol Seasonality

Sarah Smith, Yutian Wu, Rob Levy, and Mingfang Ting

Abstract. Station observations of surface Arctic aerosol have long shown a pronounced seasonal cycle, with burdens characteristically peaking in the late winter/early spring. Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) aerosol optical depth (AOD) products replicate this seasonality, but passive sensor and reanalysis data products do not. We find that the sub- and low-Arctic seasonality of gridded AOD products from six passive sensors diverges from that of CALIOP data products during the months of September–April, even when controlling for sampling biases. Using collocated CALIOP and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (Aqua) retrievals, we find that for collocations characterized by low-quality MODIS retrievals, the bias between MODIS and CALIOP strongly depends on the solar zenith angle (SZA), with MODIS AODs showing a 132 % reduction relative to the instrument-mean over a theoretical 0–90° SZA domain. As the fraction of MODIS retrievals flagged as “low-quality” increases with higher SZAs, retrieval quality mediates the relationship between the SZA and dataset biases in gridded products. The dependency is likely the result of cloud-adjacency effects, and likely also affects midlatitude AOD seasonality. Though additional sources of uncertainty in high latitude retrievals remain, the observed dependency likely impacts passive data products’ representations of (sub-)Arctic aerosol burdens in boreal spring and autumn, which are important for understanding aerosol processes in a highly sensitive yet understudied region. This work also contributes to improved understanding and quantification of the effects of viewing geometry on satellite AOD retrievals, which can help constrain aerosol observations and associated forcings, globally.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Sarah Smith, Yutian Wu, Rob Levy, and Mingfang Ting

Status: open (until 24 Feb 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sarah Smith, Yutian Wu, Rob Levy, and Mingfang Ting
Sarah Smith, Yutian Wu, Rob Levy, and Mingfang Ting

Viewed

Total article views: 48 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
41 4 3 48 5 0 0
  • HTML: 41
  • PDF: 4
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 48
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 48 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 48 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 14 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
Satellite data from a laser-based instrument show Arctic particulate matter is highest in winter and spring, and lowest in summer. However, sunlight-based instruments show the highest values in summer and very low values in autumn/spring. We find that a sunlight-based instrument retrieves lower than expected values when the sun is low on the horizon, but only when clouds are also present, likely due to cloud shadows. This causes it to underestimate particulates in winter, even beyond the Arctic.