Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3577
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3577
02 Jan 2025
 | 02 Jan 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Remote sensing of methane point sources with the MethaneAIR airborne spectrometer

Luis Guanter, Jack Warren, Mark Omara, Apisada Chulakadabba, Javier Roger, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan E. Franklin, Steven C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam

Abstract. The MethaneAIR imaging spectrometer was originally developed as an airborne demonstrator of the MethaneSAT satellite mission. MethaneAIR enables accurate methane concentration retrievals from high spectral resolution measurements in the 1650-nm methane absorption feature at a nominal spatial sampling of 5x25 m. In this work, we present a computationally-efficient data processing chain optimized for the detection and quantification of methane plumes with MethaneAIR. It involves the retrieval of methane concentration enhancements (ΔXCH4) with the high-precision matched-filter retrieval, which is applied to 1650-nm retrievals for the first time. Methane plumes are detected through visual inspection of the resulting ΔXCH4 maps. Flux rates are estimated from the detected plumes using the integrated mass enhancement (IME) method. The evaluation of the proposed methods included comparisons with simulated plumes, with existing plume retrieval and quantification methods for MethaneAIR, and with controlled methane releases. We applied our processing chain to MethaneAIR at-sensor radiance datasets acquired over the Permian Basin during flights in 2021 and 2023, which resulted in the detection of hundreds of point sources above 100–200 kg/h, with a conservative detection limit around 120 kg/h. Our results show the consistency of MethaneAIR's ΔXCH4 matched-filter retrievals, and their potential for the detection and quantification of methane point sources across large areas.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Luis Guanter, Jack Warren, Mark Omara, Apisada Chulakadabba, Javier Roger, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan E. Franklin, Steven C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam

Status: open (until 07 Feb 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Luis Guanter, Jack Warren, Mark Omara, Apisada Chulakadabba, Javier Roger, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan E. Franklin, Steven C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam
Luis Guanter, Jack Warren, Mark Omara, Apisada Chulakadabba, Javier Roger, Maryann Sargent, Jonathan E. Franklin, Steven C. Wofsy, and Ritesh Gautam

Viewed

Total article views: 81 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
66 11 4 81 0 0
  • HTML: 66
  • PDF: 11
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 81
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jan 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 37 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 37 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Jan 2025
Download
Short summary
This study presents a data processing scheme for the detection and quantification of methane emissions using the MethaneAIR airborne spectrometer. We show that the proposed methods enable the detection of smaller plumes than other existing methods, and that improves the potential of MethaneAIR to survey methane point sources across large regions