the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Observations of stratospheric gravity waves in the tropics: can GNSS-RO extend the SABER climatological record?
Abstract. The quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) is the most important phenomenon in the tropical stratosphere. It is mainly driven by small-scale gravity waves. Still, the representation of QBO in models is challenging because small-scale gravity waves are not well resolved in the models and the majority of the parametrization schemes are limited to vertical propagation only of gravity waves. One solution to this is to use high-resolution satellite observations to understand the gravity wave (GW) forcing on the QBO. However, the results can vary from one observation to another due to the unique observational filter of each instrument. Here we investigate how these differences in the observational filters between SABER and GNSS-RO satellite measurements affect our ability to capture the interactions between GWs and the QBO. To test this, we sample temperatures from the high-resolution GEOS model as if they were observed by SABER and GNSS-RO and estimate synthetic GW potential energy (Ep) observations. We then systematically vary the viewing angle and the vertical and horizontal resolutions of the instruments to determine which aspects have the most significant effect on the observed GW Ep. This allows us to understand how the observational filter of each instrument influences the observation of GW-QBO interaction and if we can bring the two observations close enough to get nearly the same results. Our results reveal that vertical resolution is the most significant factor deriving the differences between the results of both instruments. By adjusting the vertical resolution of GNSS-RO temperatures to match that of SABER, we found that the GW Ep and vertical wavelength measurements from both instruments could be brought into very close agreement.
This study not only focuses on the importance of selecting appropriate observational methods for gravity wave research but also highlights the potential of GNSS-RO to extend the long-term studies of GW interaction with the QBO that has been carried out by SABER for more than 23 years, especially as SABER approaches the end of its operational lifespan. Our findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of GW observations in the tropics and provide a foundation for future applications using merged GNSS-RO observations.
- Preprint
(3379 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3524', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Jan 2025
Comments on the manuscript "Observations of stratospheric gravity waves in the tropics: can GNSS-RO extend the SABER climatological record?"
General Comment:
Gravity waves is importing in driving QBO in the tropic stratosphere due to wave-flow interactions. Previous studies have showed that GWs with shorter vertical wavelengths play more important role in driving QBO as compared to the GWs with longer vertical wavelength. The main idea of this work is to explore the influences of observational filters of different instrument on the derived GW parameters and their possible influences with QBO. However, some revisions should be performed.Major comments:
1. The title: "can GNSS-RO extend the SABER climatological record?". The main content of this work is the effects of observational filters on the parameters of derived GWs from SABER and GNSS-RO. The title does not match the main content. Please clarify the extent and/or the aspect on which the GNSS-RO can extend the SABER climatological record.
2. Abstract: Only the purpose and method of this work are presented. It is better to present some quantitative results in the abstract.
3. Comparing the difference of Ep and vertical wavelength: the difference between those derived from SABER and GNSS-RO are compared in the manuscript. Howerver, the absolute of values of Ep and vertical wavelength derived SABER or GNSS-RO are not known, consequently, the statistical significance of the difference is unkonw. Otherwise, one may provide the percentage contributions of Ep (and vertical wavelength) on the total Ep from both SABER and GNSS-RO. Also, the statistical significance of the differences should be provided.
4. Please summarize the main similarities and differences of SABER and GNSS-RO in studying the GW-QBO interactions.Minor comments:
1. Figure 2 caption, "the thick"-->"The tick". The ticks are unreadable in panel (c) of Figure 2 and in other contour figures (Figures 3, 5, 6, 10, 11 ).
2. L266: How to determine the upper limit of horizontal wavelength (2000 km) measured by SABER and GNSS-RO?
3. L269: Since the lower limits of vertical wavelengths are different (2 km for GNSS-RO, 4 km for SABER). For a fair comparison, the analysis to GWs to GWs with vertical wavelength shorter than 12 km. The lower limits of the vertical wavelengths of both measurements should also be mentioned.
4. L278-279: "panel (a)"-->"panel (a) of Figure 3"? "panel (b)"-->"panel (b) of Figure 3"?
5. Section 4.2: There is no description on the 2019 disruption.
6. L366: Where can I refer and how can I understand the statement "the shorter wavelengths detected by GNSS-RO are associated with a larger range of Ep compared to SABER"?
7. Conclusion: It is better to conclude the new finding(s) and/or limitations more specifically and quantitatively of this work. Other than the qualitative statements such as, "emphasizing the importance of selecting an appropriate instrument for targeted gravity wave studies", etc.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3524-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Marwa Almowafy, 28 Mar 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3524/egusphere-2024-3524-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Marwa Almowafy, 28 Mar 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3524', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Feb 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3524/egusphere-2024-3524-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Marwa Almowafy, 28 Mar 2025
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2024-3524/egusphere-2024-3524-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Marwa Almowafy, 28 Mar 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
108 | 27 | 8 | 143 | 4 | 5 |
- HTML: 108
- PDF: 27
- XML: 8
- Total: 143
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 47 | 32 |
United Kingdom | 2 | 25 | 17 |
India | 3 | 10 | 6 |
China | 4 | 9 | 6 |
Germany | 5 | 7 | 4 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 47