the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Deciphering anthropogenic and biogenic contributions to selected NMVOC emissions in an urban area
Abstract. The anthropogenic and biogenic contributions of isoprene, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and methanol in an urban area were estimated based on direct eddy covariance flux observations during four campaigns between 2018 and 2021. While these compounds are typically thought to be dominated by biogenic sources on regional and global scales, the role of potentially significant anthropogenic emissions in urban areas has been recently debated. Typical fluxes of isoprene, monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes were on the order of 0.09 nmol m−2 s−1, 0.09 nmol m−2 s−1 and 0.003 nmol m−2 s−1 during spring. During summer, emission fluxes of isoprene, monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes were higher on the order of 0.85 nmol m−2 s−1, 0.11 nmol m−2 s−1, 0.004 nmol m−2 s−1. It was found that the contribution of the anthropogenic part is strongly seasonally dependent. For isoprene the anthropogenic fraction can be as high as 64 % in spring, but is typically very low < 18 % during the summer season. For monoterpenes the anthropogenic fraction was estimated between 43 % in spring and less than 20 % in summer.
With values of 2.8 nmol m−2 s−1 in spring and 3.2 nmol m−2 s−1 in summer, methanol did not exhibit a significant seasonal variation of observed surface fluxes. However, there was a difference in emissions between weekdays and weekends (about 2.3 times higher on weekdays in spring). This suggests that methanol emissions are likely influenced by anthropogenic activities during all seasons.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(2394 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2394 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-79', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Jan 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-79/egusphere-2024-79-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-79/egusphere-2024-79-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-79', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Feb 2024
Peron et al. used eddy covariance measurements of terpenoids and other VOCs to estimate their contributions from anthropogenic and biogenic sources in the city of Innsbruck, Austria.
The paper is an interesting contribution to the emerging subject of volatile chemical product emissions in urban areas, where it is especially challenging to find out how much of the terpenoids is anthropogenic. As such, it is especially important since there are, to date, few analyses of VCP emissions in European cities. The manuscript is well written, and I recommend its publication in ACP after the following comments have been addressed:
General: The paper mentions a lot of correlation analyses that were done for the data analysis but shows none of the plots. I think it would be beneficial to add supplementary material that makes at least the most important correlation analyses accessible and verifiable for the reader.
For the discussion: It would be interesting to compare the derived anthropogenic emissions to emission factors per person used in the literature (e.g. Coggon et al. 2021 use an estimate monoterpene emission factor per person), since the population in the footprint of the authors’ station should be available.
Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Gilman, J. B., Schwantes, R. H., Abuhassan, N., Aikin, K. C., Arend, M. F., Berkoff, T. A., Brown, S. S., Campos, T. L., Dickerson, R. R., Gronoff, G., Hurley, J. F., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Koss, A. R., Li, M., McKeen, S. A., Moshary, F., Peischl, J., Pospisilova, V., Ren, X., Wilson, A., Wu, Y., Trainer, M., and Warneke, C.: Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry, PNAS, 118, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118, 2021.
l. 39ff: Are these % by mass or molar? This makes an important difference. The first sentence (50% of terpene emissions are isoprene, which means that the other 50% must be monoterpenes+sesquiterpenes) contradicts the second one (15% + 0.5% do not add up to 50%).
l. 44: Unclear: do you refer to total emission strength from plants or of global methanol emissions?
l. 55: It is true that simple models based (just) on future temperatures predict an increase in BVOC terpenoid emissions, but I think the authors should acknowledge that there are other factors that play a role (e.g. increased CO2 inhibits isoprene fluxes), so the situation is way more complicated, as shown in this review: Holopainen, J. K., Virjamo, V., Ghimire, R. P., Blande, J. D., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., and Kivimäenpää, M.: Climate Change Effects on Secondary Compounds of Forest Trees in the Northern Hemisphere, Frontiers in plant science, 9, 1445, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01445, 2018.
As a result, it is impossible to predict how BVOC will change globally with climate change. This is e.g. discussed in the latest IPCC report (Szopa, S., v. Naik, Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 817–922, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008, 2021.)
Â
l. 122 ff: Regarding interferences on m/z 69.07: Firstly, it is commendable that the authors acknowledge the presence of interferences on the protonated isoprene mass. However: Did the authors do their described correlation analysis also just using nighttime data? Given the low isoprene fluxes at night in general, the interference from cooking aldehydes may be more important during the night than on average. I would like to see the respective correlation plots in the Supplement.
An interference of 30% from m/z 87.08 plus an interference of <30% from higher aldehydes seems not insignificant if anthropogenic isoprene is 64% in the spring – given the potential interference discussed by the authors, it could be that a significant fraction of that is actually from an aldehyde interference and thus likely from cooking.
So, at least the percentages given e.g. in the abstract should include uncertainties, and I wish the authors would also consider in the discussion that they may partly see the influence of cooking emissions contributing to anthropogenic m/z 69.07. It would be even better if they could correct their isoprene fluxes for the interference(s).
l. 402: Maybe I am wrong, but wasn’t the R² of 0.48 in Gkatzelis et al. related to population density, not benzene?
l. 478: The Borbon et al. studies were done more than 20 years ago. Are there any newer studies to confirm that cars with modern catalysts still emit isoprene?
l. 482: also fragranced cleaning products?
l. 516: I am missing an explanation/hypothesis as to why the sum of monoterpene fluxes stays the same between spring and summer, but the anthropogenic fraction changes. Do people use less fragranced products in the summer? (Seems a little unlikely to me.)
Data availability: I do not think it is enough to make the data available on request. The authors should upload the final flux data to a publicly accessible server with a DOI. E.g., Zenodo makes this very easy.
Â
Â
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-79-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-79/egusphere-2024-79-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
-
AC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-79', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
For some reason the system suggested a co-listing of our replies and now our reply to reviewer 2 is also co-posted below the statement of reviewer 1. This was not intended, but it should hopefully be clear from our reply which posting is meant to answer comments by reviewer #1.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-79-AC3
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-79', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Jan 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-79/egusphere-2024-79-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-79/egusphere-2024-79-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-79', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Feb 2024
Peron et al. used eddy covariance measurements of terpenoids and other VOCs to estimate their contributions from anthropogenic and biogenic sources in the city of Innsbruck, Austria.
The paper is an interesting contribution to the emerging subject of volatile chemical product emissions in urban areas, where it is especially challenging to find out how much of the terpenoids is anthropogenic. As such, it is especially important since there are, to date, few analyses of VCP emissions in European cities. The manuscript is well written, and I recommend its publication in ACP after the following comments have been addressed:
General: The paper mentions a lot of correlation analyses that were done for the data analysis but shows none of the plots. I think it would be beneficial to add supplementary material that makes at least the most important correlation analyses accessible and verifiable for the reader.
For the discussion: It would be interesting to compare the derived anthropogenic emissions to emission factors per person used in the literature (e.g. Coggon et al. 2021 use an estimate monoterpene emission factor per person), since the population in the footprint of the authors’ station should be available.
Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Gilman, J. B., Schwantes, R. H., Abuhassan, N., Aikin, K. C., Arend, M. F., Berkoff, T. A., Brown, S. S., Campos, T. L., Dickerson, R. R., Gronoff, G., Hurley, J. F., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Koss, A. R., Li, M., McKeen, S. A., Moshary, F., Peischl, J., Pospisilova, V., Ren, X., Wilson, A., Wu, Y., Trainer, M., and Warneke, C.: Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry, PNAS, 118, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118, 2021.
l. 39ff: Are these % by mass or molar? This makes an important difference. The first sentence (50% of terpene emissions are isoprene, which means that the other 50% must be monoterpenes+sesquiterpenes) contradicts the second one (15% + 0.5% do not add up to 50%).
l. 44: Unclear: do you refer to total emission strength from plants or of global methanol emissions?
l. 55: It is true that simple models based (just) on future temperatures predict an increase in BVOC terpenoid emissions, but I think the authors should acknowledge that there are other factors that play a role (e.g. increased CO2 inhibits isoprene fluxes), so the situation is way more complicated, as shown in this review: Holopainen, J. K., Virjamo, V., Ghimire, R. P., Blande, J. D., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., and Kivimäenpää, M.: Climate Change Effects on Secondary Compounds of Forest Trees in the Northern Hemisphere, Frontiers in plant science, 9, 1445, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01445, 2018.
As a result, it is impossible to predict how BVOC will change globally with climate change. This is e.g. discussed in the latest IPCC report (Szopa, S., v. Naik, Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 817–922, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008, 2021.)
Â
l. 122 ff: Regarding interferences on m/z 69.07: Firstly, it is commendable that the authors acknowledge the presence of interferences on the protonated isoprene mass. However: Did the authors do their described correlation analysis also just using nighttime data? Given the low isoprene fluxes at night in general, the interference from cooking aldehydes may be more important during the night than on average. I would like to see the respective correlation plots in the Supplement.
An interference of 30% from m/z 87.08 plus an interference of <30% from higher aldehydes seems not insignificant if anthropogenic isoprene is 64% in the spring – given the potential interference discussed by the authors, it could be that a significant fraction of that is actually from an aldehyde interference and thus likely from cooking.
So, at least the percentages given e.g. in the abstract should include uncertainties, and I wish the authors would also consider in the discussion that they may partly see the influence of cooking emissions contributing to anthropogenic m/z 69.07. It would be even better if they could correct their isoprene fluxes for the interference(s).
l. 402: Maybe I am wrong, but wasn’t the R² of 0.48 in Gkatzelis et al. related to population density, not benzene?
l. 478: The Borbon et al. studies were done more than 20 years ago. Are there any newer studies to confirm that cars with modern catalysts still emit isoprene?
l. 482: also fragranced cleaning products?
l. 516: I am missing an explanation/hypothesis as to why the sum of monoterpene fluxes stays the same between spring and summer, but the anthropogenic fraction changes. Do people use less fragranced products in the summer? (Seems a little unlikely to me.)
Data availability: I do not think it is enough to make the data available on request. The authors should upload the final flux data to a publicly accessible server with a DOI. E.g., Zenodo makes this very easy.
Â
Â
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-79-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-79/egusphere-2024-79-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
-
AC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-79', Thomas Karl, 23 Apr 2024
For some reason the system suggested a co-listing of our replies and now our reply to reviewer 2 is also co-posted below the statement of reviewer 1. This was not intended, but it should hopefully be clear from our reply which posting is meant to answer comments by reviewer #1.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-79-AC3
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
391 | 123 | 25 | 539 | 9 | 16 |
- HTML: 391
- PDF: 123
- XML: 25
- Total: 539
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
Arianna Peron
Martin Graus
Marcus Striednig
Christian Lamprecht
Georg Wohlfahrt
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(2394 KB) - Metadata XML