the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The impact of dehydration and extremely low HCl values in the Antarctic stratospheric vortex in mid-winter on ozone loss in spring
Abstract. Simulations of Antarctic chlorine and ozone chemistry show that in the core of the Antarctic vortex (16–18 km, 85–55 hPa, 390–430 K) HCl null cycles (initiated by reactions CH4 + Cl and CH2O + Cl) are effective. These HCl null cycles allow HCl mixing ratios to remain very low throughout Antarctic winter and ozone destroying chlorine (ClOx) to remain enhanced, so that rapid ozone depletion proceeds. Sensitivity studies show that the reaction CH3O2 + ClO is important for the efficacy of the HCl null cycle initiated by the reaction CH4 + Cl and that using the current kinetic recommendations instead of earlier ones has little impact on the simulations. Dehydration in Antarctica strongly reduces ice formation and the uptake of HNO3 from the gas phase; however the efficacy of HCl null cycles is not affected. Further, the effect of the observed very low HCl mixing ratios in Antarctic winter are considered; HCl null cycles are efficient in maintaining low HCl (and high ClOx) throughout Antarctic winter. All simulations presented here for the core of the Antarctic vortex show extremely low minimum ozone values (below 50 ppb) in late September/early October in agreement with observations.
- Preprint
(949 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 09 May 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-671', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Apr 2024
reply
Review of "The impact of dehydration and extremely low HCl values in the Antarctic stratospheric vortex in mid-winter on ozone loss in spring" by Zhang-Liu et al., submitted to ACP
Summary: The paper addresses three questions: What is the impact of updates to previous recommendations on chemical kinetics on Antarctic ozone depletion? Furthermore, while dehydration strongly regulates Antarctic stratospheric water vapour, its impact on ozone depletion is small. And thirdly, an HCl null cycle and a further cycle starting with CH2O + Cl -> HCl + CHO contribute substantially to keeping HCl low and ClOx high, hence leading to enhanced ozone depletion.
I learnt a few things reading the paper. I had not thought about the two null cycles and their role in sustaining ozone depletion. The prevailing view is that CH4 + Cl is a termination reaction for ozone depletion, not the start of yet another cycle of ozone depletion and a null cycle for HCl. Also the typo / order-of-magnitude error in the reaction ClO + CH3O3 is good to know about -- that might be wrong in many chemistry models. The paper represents good, solid work, enhancing our understanding of chemical kinetics of the Antarctic polar vortex. Of course this topic is sometimes considered to be fairly mature, but this paper presents a fresh take on this subject. I don't have many comments to make; the method is fairly straightforward. It involves trajectory calculations simulating atmospheric chemistry under Antarctic conditions and testing the sensitivity of the results to assumptions on initial values for HCl and water, and for correcting the typo in the rate coefficient.
I recommend publication of the paper in ACP subject to addressing the small, technical comments below.
Details:
L17: You want to add that the temperature range refers to potential temperature, the vertical coordinate in CLaMS.
L23: Replace "although" with "notwithstanding".
L60: Conventional wisdom has it that NAT is important here too. Please comment. I suggest to replace "ice particles" with "PSC particles".
L116: Replace "on" with "to".
Table 1: Here and throughout the text, I suggest to put "volume" in front of "mixing ratio", and to use units of ppmv, ppbv, etc, instead of ppm and ppb. Otherwise these can be misunderstood.
Section 3.2 Can a line be drawn from the small impact of the initial value of H2O on chlorine and ozone to the (thus far) small impact of the increased water vapour in the stratosphere since the Hunga-Tonga Hunga-Haapai eruption? There had been some expectation in the community that this would increase ozone depletion, but the 2023 season was quite ordinary.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-671-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
91 | 23 | 5 | 119 | 6 | 3 |
- HTML: 91
- PDF: 23
- XML: 5
- Total: 119
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1