the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Preparation of low concentration H2 test gas mixtures in ambient air for calibration of H2 sensors
Abstract. Using electrochemical gas sensors for quantitative measurements of trace gas components in ambient air introduces several challenges, of which interference, drift and aging of the sensor are the most significant. Frequent and precise calibration as well as thorough characterization of the sensor helps to achieve reliable and repeatable results. We therefore propose the use of a simple, lightweight and inexpensive setup to produce hydrogen calibration gases with precisely known concentrations in ambient air. The hydrogen is produced by electrolysis with electric current monitoring and the output can be set to any value between ~3 µgH2/min and ~11 µgH2/min. With a dilution flow of 500 mL/min, for example, this results in a concentration range from ~70 ppm up to ~240 ppm, but concentrations significantly below or above this range can also be covered with accordingly modified dilution flows. This setup can be used not only for calibration, but also for thorough and long-term characterization of electrochemical gas sensors to evaluate sensitivity, zero voltage and response time over extended periods of time.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(490 KB)
-
Supplement
(176 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(490 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(176 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-611', Giuseppe Etiope, 02 Apr 2024
I would like to suggest the following:
- better clarify (also in Abstract and Conclusions) the range of concentrations of H2 for which the proposed system is valid. I see a range of 50-250 ppmv in the tests;
- indicate related applications for that range (I assume not for atmospheric measurements).
- be more rigorous in the use of the terms "sensitivity" (which is voltage vs concentration) and "accuracy" (measured concentration vs real concentration), and to report (Abstract and Conclusion) the accuracy of the standard that can be obtained.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-611-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-611/egusphere-2024-611-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-611', Olivier Duclaux, 07 May 2024
Dear authors, thank for precedent clarification.
Based on the SI, the long term test confirms the repeatability of the method. Concerning stability over time, the current yield stay close to 1 during 14 hours. Anyway hydrogen production seems stable during the first two hours after the initial run-in phase, then a regular drift is observed (from 2 to 14 h, with an increase of +20 ppm). We notice “peaks” at regular intervals as if compensation has been made.
Could you explain what experimentally leads to this ?
Best regards.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-611-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-611/egusphere-2024-611-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-611', Giuseppe Etiope, 02 Apr 2024
I would like to suggest the following:
- better clarify (also in Abstract and Conclusions) the range of concentrations of H2 for which the proposed system is valid. I see a range of 50-250 ppmv in the tests;
- indicate related applications for that range (I assume not for atmospheric measurements).
- be more rigorous in the use of the terms "sensitivity" (which is voltage vs concentration) and "accuracy" (measured concentration vs real concentration), and to report (Abstract and Conclusion) the accuracy of the standard that can be obtained.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-611-RC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-611/egusphere-2024-611-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-611', Olivier Duclaux, 07 May 2024
Dear authors, thank for precedent clarification.
Based on the SI, the long term test confirms the repeatability of the method. Concerning stability over time, the current yield stay close to 1 during 14 hours. Anyway hydrogen production seems stable during the first two hours after the initial run-in phase, then a regular drift is observed (from 2 to 14 h, with an increase of +20 ppm). We notice “peaks” at regular intervals as if compensation has been made.
Could you explain what experimentally leads to this ?
Best regards.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-611-RC2 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-611/egusphere-2024-611-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC2', Thorsten Hoffmann, 12 May 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
248 | 63 | 23 | 334 | 32 | 18 | 15 |
- HTML: 248
- PDF: 63
- XML: 23
- Total: 334
- Supplement: 32
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Niklas Karbach
Lisa Höhler
Peter Hoor
Heiko Bozem
Nicole Bobrwoski
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(490 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(176 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper