13 Mar 2024
 | 13 Mar 2024

The (non)effect of personalization in climate texts on credibility of climate scientists

Anna Leerink, Mark Bos, Daan Reijnders, and Erik van Sebille

Abstract. How we communicate about climate change affects how others think, feel and act. Therefore, the way climate scientists formulate messages is important. In this study, we assess the effect of personalization, operationalized as writing in a conversational style, as previously done by Ginns and Fraser (2010), and perceived credibility of climate scientists. We exposed hundred participants aged between 18 and 35 to three conditions of a text on the climate impact of train versus plane travel, with varying degree of personalization, and assessed the outcome in their attitude (specifically interest and opinion) towards sustainable travel, as well as the perceived credibility of the climate scientist who wrote the text. Results show that there is a small effect in the degree of happiness after reading the different texts, but little other effects. Our main conclusion is that, although personalization may be well received by readers, it may not be the best mode to influence the attitudes of readers towards sustainable travel, nor how readers come to perceive climate scientists' credibility.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Anna Leerink, Mark Bos, Daan Reijnders, and Erik van Sebille

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-543', Sam Illingworth, 20 May 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Erik van Sebille, 28 May 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-543', Louise Arnal, 14 Jun 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Erik van Sebille, 27 Jun 2024
Anna Leerink, Mark Bos, Daan Reijnders, and Erik van Sebille

Interactive computing environment

Python notebook with analysis and plotting code Erik van Sebille

Anna Leerink, Mark Bos, Daan Reijnders, and Erik van Sebille


Total article views: 318 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
221 72 25 318 9 9
  • HTML: 221
  • PDF: 72
  • XML: 25
  • Total: 318
  • BibTeX: 9
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Mar 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Mar 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 335 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 335 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 12 Jul 2024
Short summary
Climate scientists who communicate to a broad audience may be reluctant to write in a more personal style, because they assume that it hurts their credibility. To test this assumption, we asked 100 Dutch people to rate the credibility of a climate scientist. We varied how the author of the article addressed the reader, and found that the degree of personalisation did not have a measurable impact on the credibility of the author. So we conclude that personalisation may not hurt credibility.