the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The (non)effect of personalization in climate texts on credibility of climate scientists
Abstract. How we communicate about climate change affects how others think, feel and act. Therefore, the way climate scientists formulate messages is important. In this study, we assess the effect of personalization, operationalized as writing in a conversational style, as previously done by Ginns and Fraser (2010), and perceived credibility of climate scientists. We exposed hundred participants aged between 18 and 35 to three conditions of a text on the climate impact of train versus plane travel, with varying degree of personalization, and assessed the outcome in their attitude (specifically interest and opinion) towards sustainable travel, as well as the perceived credibility of the climate scientist who wrote the text. Results show that there is a small effect in the degree of happiness after reading the different texts, but little other effects. Our main conclusion is that, although personalization may be well received by readers, it may not be the best mode to influence the attitudes of readers towards sustainable travel, nor how readers come to perceive climate scientists' credibility.
- Preprint
(1157 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 02 Jun 2024)
Data sets
Survey data Anna Leerink and Erik van Sebille https://github.com/erikvansebille/KH_personalization_effect/blob/main/KlimaatHelpdesk_20240105.csv
Interactive computing environment
Python notebook with analysis and plotting code Erik van Sebille https://github.com/erikvansebille/KH_personalization_effect/blob/main/analyse_KH_data.ipynb
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
105 | 26 | 6 | 137 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 105
- PDF: 26
- XML: 6
- Total: 137
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1