the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Effects of surface water interactions with karst groundwater on microbial biomass, metabolism, and production
Abstract. Unearthing the effects of surface water and groundwater interactions on subsurface biogeochemical reactions is crucial for developing a more mechanistic understanding of carbon and energy flow in aquifer ecosystems. To examine physiological characteristics across groundwater microbial communities that experience varying degrees of interaction with surface waters, we investigated ten springs and a river sink and rise system in North Central Florida that discharge from 10 and/or mix with the karstic Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA). Groundwater with longer residence times in the aquifer had lower concentrations of dissolved oxygen, dissolved and particulate organic carbon, and microbial biomass, as well as the lowest rates of respiration (0.102 to 0.189 mg O2 L-1 d-1) and heterotrophic production (198 to 576 μg C L-1 d-1). Despite these features, oligotrophic UFA groundwater (< 0.5 mg C L-1) contained bioavailable organic matter that supported doubling times (14 to 62 h) and cell specific production rates (0.0485 to 0.261 pmol C cell-1 h-1) comparable to those 15 observed for surface waters (17 to 20 h; 0.105 to 0.124 pmol C cell-1 h-1). The relatively high specific rates of dissimilatory and assimilatory metabolism indicate a subsurface source of labile carbon to the groundwater (e.g., secondary production and/or chemoautotrophy). Our results link variations in UFA hydrobiogeochemistry to the physiology of its groundwater communities, providing a basis to develop new hypotheses related to microbial carbon cycling, trophic hierarchy, and processes generating bioavailable organic matter in karstic aquifer ecosystems.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1161 KB)
-
Supplement
(975 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1161 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(975 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-49', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Mar 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-49/egusphere-2024-49-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Xiaogang Chen, 09 Apr 2024
General comments:
The authors have conducted a study investigating the relationship between groundwater residence time and the bioavailability of organic matter, as well as microbial biomass, metabolism, and production in karstic landforms where groundwater interacts with surface water. This case study provides valuable insights into groundwater microbial communities in the karst Upper Floridan Aquifer. The paper is well-structured and well-written. I recommend accepting the paper after addressing the following minor revisions:
(Xiaogang Chen/Westlake University)
Specific comments:
Results:
In Table 1, some instances of "N.d." were written as "N.d" in the row for "DIC". Additionally, the note below Table 1 for "Sp. Cond" does not match the values in the table.
Table 2 contains two variations of "Not applicable", mentioned as "N.a" or "N.a."
The figures appear blurry, and the color of the graph's axes could be made darker to enhance clarity for readers.
In line 351-352, please provide accurate data or a figure to support the statement regarding "ATP-based biomass concentrations in samples from River Rise at low flow being significantly higher than values at high flow and approximately 3-fold lower than those observed for River Sink at low flow."
Line 357-359 refers to "Fig. 2c," but there is no such figure mentioned in the article.
In line 390-392 and line 407-408, the authors state that the incorporation rate of 3H-thymidine was much higher from Madison Blue Spring. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to use the 3H-thymidine incorporation rate when evaluating doubling times at Madison Blue Spring.
Discussion:
In line 460, please attempt to explain why ATP contents are high at Devil's Eye Spring.
Please address these revisions in the manuscript. Overall, the paper is well-done and provides valuable insights into the topic.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-49-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Adrian Barry, 30 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-49/egusphere-2024-49-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Adrian Barry, 30 Apr 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Adrian Barry, 30 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-49/egusphere-2024-49-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Xiaogang Chen, 09 Apr 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-49', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Mar 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-49/egusphere-2024-49-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Xiaogang Chen, 09 Apr 2024
General comments:
The authors have conducted a study investigating the relationship between groundwater residence time and the bioavailability of organic matter, as well as microbial biomass, metabolism, and production in karstic landforms where groundwater interacts with surface water. This case study provides valuable insights into groundwater microbial communities in the karst Upper Floridan Aquifer. The paper is well-structured and well-written. I recommend accepting the paper after addressing the following minor revisions:
(Xiaogang Chen/Westlake University)
Specific comments:
Results:
In Table 1, some instances of "N.d." were written as "N.d" in the row for "DIC". Additionally, the note below Table 1 for "Sp. Cond" does not match the values in the table.
Table 2 contains two variations of "Not applicable", mentioned as "N.a" or "N.a."
The figures appear blurry, and the color of the graph's axes could be made darker to enhance clarity for readers.
In line 351-352, please provide accurate data or a figure to support the statement regarding "ATP-based biomass concentrations in samples from River Rise at low flow being significantly higher than values at high flow and approximately 3-fold lower than those observed for River Sink at low flow."
Line 357-359 refers to "Fig. 2c," but there is no such figure mentioned in the article.
In line 390-392 and line 407-408, the authors state that the incorporation rate of 3H-thymidine was much higher from Madison Blue Spring. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to use the 3H-thymidine incorporation rate when evaluating doubling times at Madison Blue Spring.
Discussion:
In line 460, please attempt to explain why ATP contents are high at Devil's Eye Spring.
Please address these revisions in the manuscript. Overall, the paper is well-done and provides valuable insights into the topic.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-49-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Adrian Barry, 30 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-49/egusphere-2024-49-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Adrian Barry, 30 Apr 2024
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Adrian Barry, 30 Apr 2024
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-49/egusphere-2024-49-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Xiaogang Chen, 09 Apr 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Data sets
Water Chemistry, Nitrogen and CDOM/FDOM Data from the Santa Fe River Watershed, North-Central Florida Madison K. Flint http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/a876020b85d6413f8486c57dc0b0e3bf
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
269 | 88 | 32 | 389 | 46 | 16 | 21 |
- HTML: 269
- PDF: 88
- XML: 32
- Total: 389
- Supplement: 46
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Adrian Barry-Sosa
Madison K. Flint
Justin C. Ellena
Jonathan B. Martin
Brent C. Christner
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1161 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(975 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper