the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Simulated mixing in the UTLS by small-scale turbulence using multi-scale chemistry-climate model MECO(n)
Abstract. The chemical composition of the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS) plays an important role for the climate by affecting the radiation budget. Small-scale diabatic mixing like turbulence has a significant impact on the distribution of tracers which further affect the energy budget via their radiative impact. Current models usually have a higher resolution near the surface and a coarser grid spacing in the free atmosphere, which is insufficent to resolve the occurrence of small-scale turbulence in the UTLS. In this work, we utilise enhanced vertical resolution (200 m in the UTLS) simulations focusing on mixing events in the Scandinavian region using the state-of-the-art multi-scale atmospheric chemistry model system MECO(n). These model simulations are able to represent different distinct turbulent mixing events in the UTLS and depict a significant impact of mixing on the tracer distribution in the UTLS. A novel diagnostic (delta tracer-tracer correlation) is introduced to determine the direction of the vertical mixing. The strength of the UTLS turbulent mixing depends on the particular situation, i.e., the vertical tracer gradient, and dynamical and thermodynamical forcing, i.e., vertical wind shear, deformation and static stability. This work provides evidence that high resolution simulations are able to represent significant turbulent mixing in the UTLS region, allowing for further research on the UTLS turbulent mixing and its implications for the climate system.
- Preprint
(9003 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(36431 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 07 Feb 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3805', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Jan 2025
reply
Referee comment on "Simulated mixing in the UTLS by small-scale turbulence using multi-scale chemistry-climate model MECO(n)”
This manuscript evaluates the ability of the multi-scale chemistry-climate model MECO to simulate turbulent mixing in the UTLS region in the Scandinavian region. The vertical resolution used in the UTLS region is enhanced compared to current models and passive tracers are used. A delta tracer-tracer correlation determines the direction of the mixing. Besides, the effect of the tracer gradient, dynamical and thermodynamical forcing on the strength of mixing are investigated. The manuscript is relevant to the scientific community. However, the following questions should be addressed prior to publication:
Specific comments
- In section 3.1, the authors compared the model TKE with the turbulence diagnostic TI1 using the grid-scale wind data. Where does this grid-scale wind data come from? Is it data produced by COSMO? And if so, why do not the authors use ERA-5 data to evaluate the ability of COSMO to represent turbulence? Besides, the authors say that the differences between TI1 and TKE “might be caused by the neglected mechanism of the Ellrod index or sub-grid scale processes that could potentially lead to the formation of turbulence in the UTLS, e.g., scale-resolved gravity waves” (lines 137-138). First sub-grid scale processes are mentioned as a possible source of discrepancies and then an example is presented talking about scale-resolved gravity waves. Please, check and clarify this.
- Throughout the paper, the authors used different dates and times to analyze turbulence and the distribution of passive tracers for three different cases but did not explain the reasons behind that selection. Could the authors justify why they chose these dates and times? Are they based on aircraft measurements, soundings? Please, explain. The clarity and quality of the paper will improve if information about the synoptic situation is included.
- In Table 1, the different mixing ratios of the two passive tracers are presented without further explanation about the selection of these values and gradients. Could the authors provide an explanation for these ranges of the mixing values for each of the tracers? Why the different types of gradients for O3 (steep) and NO2(gentle) initialization?
- Figures 5 and 6 show the distribution of tracers and the tracer-tracer correlation for a particular cross-section as mentioned in line 154. Where is this cross-section located on the map? Please, include it either in Figure 3 or Figure 4 or explain it in the text. This way the reader knows which section of the map is being analyzed. On a related note, no reference to the location where the three different study cases are performed is indicated in the text. Is it the same location as Figure 5 and 6? Please, clarify.
- Line258: here the authors say that the mixing can be irreversible when “the exchange of tracers happens along a diagonal of a delta tracer-tracer correlation” while in the beginning of section 3.3.3 they say that scattered values from the diagonal are an indication of irreversible mixing. Please, clarify.
Technical corrections
- Line 85: could the authors explain why the focus is on the Scandinavian region instead of on the eastern Mediterranean (line 45: the authors say it is an area with strong STE)?
- Line 88: delete “tbc”.
- Line 129: “…this section analyses, ” delete the comma.
- Line 131: what do the authors mean by “grid-scale wind data”?
- Line 154: replace “ooff” by “off”.
- Figure 5: please include in the caption a description of what the black line represents. It is not explicitly mentioned here or in the text.
- Line 187: after “vertical wind shear” please include “(VWS)” so that it is easier for the reader to follow the text while looking at the Figures.
- Line 189: please, include a description of N2 as it is the first time that it appears in the text.
- Line 195: add a comma after “Besides the diffusion coefficient”.
- Please, include the units used in each subplot in Figures 7, 9 and 10.
- Line 210: “spheric air could attributed”. Change for “could be attributed”.
- Line 214: put “the N2 is distinctly higher in this region” inside parenthesis.
- Line 241: delete the comma after “new”. Too long sentence. Please, split.
- Line 250. Change the comma after “real world” for a full stop.
- Line 206, replace “.e.g.” by “,e.g.”
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3805-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3805', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Jan 2025
reply
see attached PDF
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
195 | 31 | 11 | 237 | 74 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 195
- PDF: 31
- XML: 11
- Total: 237
- Supplement: 74
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1