the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Controls on Palaeogene deep-sea diatom-bearing sediment deposition and comparison with shallow marine environments
Abstract. Diatoms are the key players in the present-day global biogeochemical cycles. Yet, the diatom flux response to the dynamically changing climates of the Palaeogene has long been a subject to divergent interpretations. We present a compilation of Palaeogene deep-sea diatom-bearing sediments in order to gain new insight into inter-basin and latitudinal distribution of diatom accumulation zones from the K/Pg boundary to the Oligocene/Miocene transition. Our dataset includes 189 sites drilled in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans, and in the Arctic. It suggests that the number and distribution of deep-sea diatom- bearing sediment occurrences is mainly controlled by the nutrient availibility and ocean circulation. Climate appears to have only an indirect correlation with our results, which may be linked to the expansion of the Antarctic Ice Sheet during the Oligocene global cooling. A comparison of our results with the temporal ditribution of shallow marine diatomite occurrences (Figus et al., 2024a) suggests that the increase in the number of deep-sea diatom-bearing sediment occurrences (particularly in the Atlantic) during the diatomite gap (~46 to ~44 Ma) is probably related to the tectonic reorganizations occurring during this period. These palaeogeographic changes caused the cessation of shallow marine diatomite deposition, and an increase in nutrient availability through continental weathering intensification.
- Preprint
(1853 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(11450 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 Feb 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3768', Eunah Han, 06 Jan 2025
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-3768/egusphere-2024-3768-RC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Cécile Figus, 24 Jan 2025
reply
Dear Eunah Han,
Thank you for your comments on our manuscript. We will make the changes you requested in the specific and technical comments. However, we would like to discuss your general comment.
The novelty of this paper lies in the compilation of published local-scale (sites) results, and in the comparison of deep-sea diatom-bearing sediments with our previous study on shallow marine diatomites. Although the data we use are published, no global compilation of deep-sea diatom-bearing sediments has been produced before, and the compilation of these data presents new scientific results, which are not visible without all the data being brought together. Previous studies compiling deep-sea data are on a smaller scale, such as that of Witkowski et al. (2021), so the development of a global-scale study demonstrates differences in diatom accumulation from ocean to ocean.
In addition, the discussion is not augmented by a summary of our previous study but, as stated in the title, the second objective of this article is to compare these deep-sea results with those from the shallow marine environment, due to the different diatom responses in these two environments during the diatomite gap (middle Eocene). It is therefore necessary to present our previously published data on shallow marine diatomites in order to highlight the differences in results and controlling factors.
Best regards,
Cécile Figus, on behalf of all Co-Authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3768-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Cécile Figus, 24 Jan 2025
reply
Data sets
Compilations of Palaeogene deep-sea diatom-bearing sediments and associated data C. Figus et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14245396
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
126 | 32 | 10 | 168 | 16 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 126
- PDF: 32
- XML: 10
- Total: 168
- Supplement: 16
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1