the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Effect of horizontal resolution in North Atlantic mixing and ocean circulation in the EC-Earth3P HighResMIP simulations
Abstract. We investigate the impact of increasing horizontal model resolution on the oceanic mixing processes in the North Atlantic, their drivers, their link with the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), and the propagation of newly generated dense waters through the deep western boundary current (DWBC). We use three versions of the EC-Earth Earth System Model, one of standard resolution (SR, ~ 1° in the ocean), one of high resolution (HR, ~ 0.25° in the ocean) and one of very high resolution (VHR, ~ 1/12° in the ocean). The higher resolutions allow for the explicit simulation of mesoscale processes that are parametrized at the coarse resolution, with additional improvements in ocean topography, boundary currents and air-sea interactions.
We find that the North Atlantic Oscillation plays a critical role in driving the mixed layer depth (MLD) in the Labrador Sea at HR and VHR. The three resolutions also show the influence of surface salinity signals in the mixing, with the VHR configuration showing a distinct slow propagation of these signals from the eastern subpolar gyre into the Labrador Sea. Furthermore, March MLD shows a strong positive bias in HR, which is reduced in VHR. In terms of the AMOC, resolution plays a pivotal role in shaping its response to the mixing. At the higher resolutions, the signal of the newly formed dense waters propagates faster along the better-resolved boundary current, indicating a shift from advective propagation to wave propagation of the signals. Additionally, the persistence of the AMOC responses to MLD is much shorter in VHR (less than 2 years) than for SR and HR, which exhibit longer-lived changes. These differences highlight how resolution affects both the timing and spatial reach of the AMOC changes.
Our study underscores the importance of model resolution in accurately simulating the North Atlantic's oceanic processes and their implications for the AMOC. While the VHR configuration offers a more realistic climatology of the Labrador Sea MLD, the results also demonstrate significant differences in variability and persistence across resolutions. These findings stress the need for high-resolution simulations to improve the understanding of deep ocean processes and their connection to larger climate systems, although they also highlight challenges in comparing simulated and observed data, particularly given the sparse historical observations and the lack of decadal variability in the model simulations.
- Preprint
(10753 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3625', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Dec 2024
General comments
In this paper, the authors investigate the effect of horizontal resolution on the North Atlantic mixed layer depth and its link to the AMOC. Their analysis is based on three simulations performed with the EC-Earth3 climate model.
Overall, the paper is well-structured and well-written. The analysis is sound, and results are mainly descriptive. The paper could benefit from a more thorough discussion of the broader implications of the findings.
My comments are mainly orientated to improve the presentation of the results, particularly the figures along with a few minor suggestions to improve the text.
Specific comments on figures
The manuscript includes several geographical references. While some (e.g., Labrador Sea, Irminger Sea, Nordic Seas) are familiar, others (e.g., Cape Farewell, Cape Hatteras) may not be as well-known to all readers. I recommend adding these locations to one of the maps.
F1, F2, FA3. I suggest changing the colorbar of these figures because it is difficult to distinguish the differences, particularly for values below 1000m. Besides, it is hard to see the black line of the climatological sea ice superimposed to the dark contours.
Table 2. I am a bit confused with the information that T2 provides. What exactly does the correlation represent? If it shows the correlation of vertical profiles (model vs. observations), the high values may not be surprising, as they primarily reflect the expected stratification (densest waters at the bottom, lightest at the surface). For instance, the 0.987 correlation for VHR is only a slight improvement over 0.976 for SR. Moreover, visually, Fig. 3a suggests that SR may outperform HR and VHR in some aspects.
F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, FA2, FA5. I suggest plotting dots when the values are significant instead of the other way around.
FA4. The red line in these plots is not distinguishable.
Minor comments and typos
In several places, the cited papers are not properly ordered eg. L48, L64, L65, L76, L194, L238
L13. ‘highest’ instead of ‘higher’
L96-97. Should be: Haarsma et al. (2020) and Moreno Chamarro et al. (2024).
L203. ‘less stratified resolution’ sounds strange to me. I suggest ‘the model version which represents the weakest vertical stratification’.There are other places in the manuscript referring to the model version as resolution alone that can be improved.
L330. ‘highest’ instead of ‘higher’.
L364. ‘partly due to a positive sea ice bias’. This is not actually demonstrated in the current study, but it is so far a hypothesis.
L371-372. ‘A positive NAO phase is found to drive an increase in MLD mixing and the response occurs for negative NAO phases.’ I don’t understand this sentence, please rephrase it.
L375-376. ‘Differences inter-model differences’. Please, delete the first ‘differences’.
L381. What does ‘an almost instantaneous AMOC to mixing, of limited latitudinal reach and persistence’ mean? I don’t understand this sentence.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3625-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Eneko Martin-Martinez, 07 Feb 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3625', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Jan 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Eneko Martin-Martinez, 07 Feb 2025
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
227 | 65 | 11 | 303 | 7 | 7 |
- HTML: 227
- PDF: 65
- XML: 11
- Total: 303
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 105 | 35 |
Spain | 2 | 57 | 19 |
Germany | 3 | 19 | 6 |
China | 4 | 17 | 5 |
France | 5 | 10 | 3 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 105