Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-360
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-360
08 Feb 2024
 | 08 Feb 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

In-plume and out-of-plume analysis of aerosol-cloud interactions derived from the 2014–15 Holuhraun volcanic eruption

Amy H. Peace, Ying Chen, George Jordan, Daniel G. Partridge, Florent Malavelle, Eliza Duncan, and Jim M. Haywood

Abstract. Aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) has persisted as the most uncertain aspect of anthropogenic forcing over the industrial period, limiting our ability to constrain estimates of climate sensitivity and to confidently predict 21st century climate change. Aerosol-cloud interactions are the most uncertain component of aerosol ERF. The 2014–15 Holuhraun volcanic eruption acted as large source of sulphur dioxide, providing an opportunistic experiment for studying aerosol-cloud interactions at a climatically relevant scale. We evaluate the observed aerosol-induced perturbation to cloud properties inside the volcanic plume in the first month of the eruption and compare the results to those from UKESM1 (UK Earth System Model). In the first two weeks, as expected, we find an in-plume shift to smaller and more numerous cloud droplets in both the observations and the simulations, as well as an observed change in the distribution of liquid water path (LWP) values inside the plume. However, in the third week, the in-plume shift to smaller and more numerous cloud droplets is neither observed nor modelled, and there are discrepancies between the observed and modelled response in the fourth week. Analysis of the model simulations and trajectory modelling reveals that airmass history and background meteorological factors can strongly influence aerosol-cloud interactions between the weeks of our analysis. Overall, our study supports the findings of many previous studies; that the aerosol impact on cloud effective radius is significant, with a less significant effect on in-cloud LWP.

Amy H. Peace, Ying Chen, George Jordan, Daniel G. Partridge, Florent Malavelle, Eliza Duncan, and Jim M. Haywood

Status: open (until 21 Mar 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Amy H. Peace, Ying Chen, George Jordan, Daniel G. Partridge, Florent Malavelle, Eliza Duncan, and Jim M. Haywood
Amy H. Peace, Ying Chen, George Jordan, Daniel G. Partridge, Florent Malavelle, Eliza Duncan, and Jim M. Haywood

Viewed

Total article views: 216 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
158 51 7 216 32 2 1
  • HTML: 158
  • PDF: 51
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 216
  • Supplement: 32
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 208 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 208 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
Natural aerosols from volcanic eruptions can help us understand how anthropogenic aerosols modify climate. We use observations and model simulations of the 2014–15 Holuhraun eruption plume to examine aerosol-cloud interactions in September 2014. We find a shift to clouds with smaller, more numerous cloud droplets in the first two weeks of the eruption. In the third week, the background meteorology and previous conditions experienced by airmasses modulate the aerosol perturbation to clouds.