the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Estimation of particulate organic carbon export to the ocean from lateral degradations of tropical peatland coasts
Abstract. The amount of particulate organic carbon (POC) export to the ocean due to coastal erosion and peat mass movement events on Bengkalis Island, Indonesia, was estimated. The annual flux of POC to the ocean due to coastal erosion along the research area of Bengkalis Island was estimated to be in the range of 2.06 to 7.60 tC m−1 yr−1. POC exports to the ocean by events of peat mass movement along the coast of the northern part of Bengkalis Island were estimated in a range of 1.43 to 5.41 tC m−1, with an average increase of 2.23 tC m-1 from 2010 to 2018. The estimation of the POC flux was carried out by combining the analysis of the peat soil and the estimation of the volume of exported peat using aerial photogrammetry and satellite imagery analysis. A linear relationship was found between the area affected by the landslide and the volume of the peat soil divided by area. Coastal erosion and peat mass movements occurred in a chain of events, confirming that peat from coastal areas was exported to the ocean. Annual export of POC from coastal erosion for 1 m was equivalent to annual carbon emissions from degraded peatlands of 0.41 to 1.52 hectares. The carbon export rate per metre from events of peat mass movement corresponds to carbon emissions produced over one year of 0.29 to 1.08 hectares of degraded peatlands. On a peatland coast with an average length of 3,152 metres, the amount of POC exported to the ocean due to events of peat mass movement was estimated to range from 4.45 to 17.1 ktC, while the POC exported due to coastal erosion was estimated to range from 6.35 to 23.9 ktC yr-1. These lateral carbon exports on the tropical peatland coast indicate a new route of carbon export to the ocean, in addition to the common riverine discharge of organic carbon.
- Preprint
(6191 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 27 Jan 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3547', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Jan 2025
reply
Review of “Estimation of particulate organic carbon export to the ocean from
lateral degradations of tropical peatland coasts” by Kagawa et al. for consideration in EGUsphere.
Kagawa et al. estimate the amount of particulate organic carbon (POC) export to the ocean due to coastal erosion and peat mass movement events on Bengkalis Island, Indonesia, using aerial photogrammetry and satellite imagery analysis. The topic of this study is interesting and important. Nonetheless, I have three major concerns on the current manuscript.
First, to my understanding, this study is more like a study of remote sensing or GIS, rather than a biogeochemical study. The major works involved in this study is about feature (e.g. vegetation, and topography) recognition based on UVA and satellite images. Few biogeochemical analysis has been involved or revealed in this study. Maybe a journal of remote sensing is more suitable to this manuscript.
Second, I am a bit worrying about the novelty of this study. The findings in this study depends strongly on the specific conditions of topography, vegetation, climate, tide and coastal wave. I don’t think the POC loss rates due to coastal erosion at the current study site can be used as a reference for estimating the coastal POC loss rates in other places. So I am wondering whether this study has provided a vital or reliable implication for understanding global land-ocean POC fluxes. By the way, the authors should give a better discussion on the implications of this study.
Third, an analysis on the environmental controls (land use change, climate change, see level rise?) of the interannual variation of peat mass movement and the POC export from land to the ocean is important to improve the novelty of this study, and will make this study better fit the scope of Biogeosciences. Unfortunately, I have not seen any analysis on the drivers of the peat mass movement and the POC loss.
Specific comments:
The Introduction section has not been organized well. The authors using a lot words to describe the importance and formation of peatland, however, the introduction on coastal erosion, in particular the coastal erosion of peat, is very weak. Moreover, the specific aims of this study should be provided in the last paragraph of the Introduction section.
Fig. 5: The current figure caption is lengthy. A figure caption should be like “Flowchart used in this study to *****”
L140-144: Why not include more satellite in different times? Is there any Google Earth image or satellite images for recent years after 2018?
Fig. 12: What are the P01-P04 represent? Are they soil cores from different locations of the study area? Please provide a map of the soil collection sites.
Fig. 16: Why the unit of POC export rate per unit length is tC m-1, rather than tc m-1 yr-1?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3547-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hiroki Kagawa, 06 Jan 2025
reply
Dear RC1,
Thank you very much for taking the time to review our manuscript and for providing insightful and constructive comments.
We greatly appreciate your valuable feedback, which will undoubtedly help improve the quality of our work.We are currently addressing your comments in detail and will provide a revised version of the manuscript along with a point-by-point response to each of your suggestions in due course.
We truly value your guidance and expertise in this process.
Thank you again for taking your time and effort for us.
Kind regards,
Hiroki Kagawa
Yamaguchi UniversityCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3547-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hiroki Kagawa, 06 Jan 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
240 | 47 | 14 | 301 | 2 | 1 |
- HTML: 240
- PDF: 47
- XML: 14
- Total: 301
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 1
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1