the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Analysis of raindrop size distribution from the double moment cloud microphysics scheme for monsoon over a tropical station
Abstract. Accurate precipitation forecasting hinges on the representation of microphysical processes within numerical models. A key approach to understanding these processes is through the analysis of hydrometeor drop size distribution (DSD). The characteristics of DSD bulk parameters:-Mass Weighted Mean Diameter (Dm) and the Normalized Number Concentration parameter (Nw), are estimated from the double moment cloud microphysical scheme (CASIM: Cloud-Aerosol Interacting Microphysics) employed in the operational convection permitted model of National Centre for Medium-Range Weather Fore- casting (NCUM-R). The observations from the Joss-Valdvogel Disdrometer (JWD) and the Global Precipitation Mission – Dual Frequency Precipitation Radar (GPM-DPR) are analyzed for providing essential validation. An algorithm for separating the monsoon precipitation into convective and stratiform types in NCUM-R and a new parameter estimation module to obtain DSD parameters from the CASIM are established in the study. The model exhibits agreement with the characteristics of the DSD of raindrops with Dm ranging from 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm marking the majority of the monsoon precipitation events. However, the underestimation when it comes to the larger drops (with Dm > 3.25 mm and Rainrate >= 8 mm/hr) demands a reassessment in microphysical parameterizations. The advanced autoconversion parameterization scheme applied in CASIM favored the growth of large drops compared to the existing scheme. The enhanced growth of larger drops is reflected in the increased accuracy in the prediction of extreme precipitation associated with a convective event. The current study underscores the importance of refining microphysical parameterizations to improve the accuracy of precipitation forecasts offering a pathway for enhanced model performance in future operational forecasting systems.
- Preprint
(1436 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 12 Feb 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3538', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Jan 2025
reply
Comments on “Analysis of raindrop size distribution from the double moment cloud microphysics scheme for monsoon over a tropical station”
General comments:
This paper examines the double moment cloud physics scheme used in the National Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting model with ground-based disdrometer observations. The result that autoconversion schemes affect the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) is interesting. However, as the measurement error of the Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer (JWD) on the number concentration of raindrops is not taken into account, there are some questions about the evaluation of the simulation results. I recommend a major revision before publication in ACP.Major comments:
(1) From equations (12) and (15), the 0th and the 3rd moments of DSD are used to estimate Dm in this study. However, it is questionable whether JWD can accurately measure the 0th moment (number concentration of raindrops). The dead time problem and the cut-off at 0.3mm are the reasons for this. According to equation (12), underestimation of the number concentration of raindrops by JWD leads to underestimation of λ, which in turn leads to overestimation of Dm. It can therefore be assumed that the difference in Dm between the JWD and the simulation is due to errors in the JWD measurement. The DSDs from JWD should be corrected, for example, using the method of Raupach et al. (2019).(2) P12 Lines 267-269: The authors state that “the model shows agreement with the JWD and GPM for raindrops with a maximum frequency of occurrence of Dm between 1 mm and 2 mm”, but the model seems to overestimate Nw compared to the JWD. It is desirable to have a quantitative comparison between the simulation and the observation.
Minor comments:
(3) Equation (8): 103 should be in the numerator because the unit of LWC is [g/m3] and the unit of ρw is [kg/m3].(4) Fig. 7c: The plots for convective precipitation are not visible due to overlap.
References
Raupach, T. H., Thurai, M., Bringi, V. N., and Berne, A. 2019: Reconstructing the Drizzle Mode of the Raindrop Size Distribution Using Double-Moment Normalization, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 145–164.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3538-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
115 | 17 | 5 | 137 | 2 | 4 |
- HTML: 115
- PDF: 17
- XML: 5
- Total: 137
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1