Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-350
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-350
15 Feb 2024
 | 15 Feb 2024

High-resolution 4D ERT monitoring of recently deglaciated sediments undergoing freeze-thaw transitions in the High Arctic

Mihai O. Cimpoiasu, Oliver Kuras, Harry Harrison, Paul B. Wilkinson, Philip Meldrum, Jonathan E. Chambers, Dane Liljestrand, Carlos Oroza, Steven K. Schmidt, Pacifica Sommers, Lara Vimercati, Trevor P. Irons, Zhou Lyu, Adam Solon, and James A. Bradley

Abstract. Arctic regions are under immense pressure from a continuously warming climate. Understanding the physical mechanisms and processes that determine soil liquid moisture availability contributes to the way we conceptualize and understand the development and functioning of terrestrial Arctic ecosystems. However, harsh weather and logistical constraints limit opportunities to directly observe subsurface processes year-round, hence automated and uninterrupted strategies of monitoring soil physicochemical properties are essential. Geoelectrical monitoring using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has proven to be an effective method to capture soil moisture distribution in time and space. ERT instrumentation has been adapted for year-round operation in high- latitude weather conditions. We installed two geoelectrical monitoring stations on the forefield of a retreating glacier on Svalbard, consisting of semi-permanent surface ERT arrays and co-located soil sensors, which track seasonal changes in 3D of soil electrical resistivity, moisture and temperature. One of the stations observes recently exposed sediments (5–10 years since deglaciation), whilst the other covers more established sediments (50 years since deglaciation). We obtained a one-year continuous measurement record (Oct 2021–Sep 2022), which produced 4D images of soil freeze-thaw transitions with unprecedented detail, allowing us to calculate the velocity of the thawing front in 3D. At its peak, this was found to be 1 m/day for the older sediments and 0.4 m/day for the younger sediments. Records of soil moisture and thermal regime obtained by sensors help define the conditions under which snowmelt takes place. Our data reveal that the freeze-thaw shoulder period, during which the surface soils experienced the zero-curtain effect, lasted 23 days at the site closer to the glacier, but only 6 days for the older sediments. Furthermore, we used unsupervised clustering to classify areas of the soil volume according to their electrical resistivity coefficient of variance, which enables us to understand spatial variations in susceptibility to water phase transition. Novel insights about soil moisture dynamics throughout the spring melt will help parameterize models of biological activity to build a more predictive understanding of newly emerging terrestrial landscapes and their impact on carbon and nutrient cycling.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

29 Jan 2025
High-resolution 4D electrical resistivity tomography and below-ground point sensor monitoring of High Arctic deglaciated sediments capture zero-curtain effects, freeze–thaw transitions, and mid-winter thawing
Mihai O. Cimpoiasu, Oliver Kuras, Harry Harrison, Paul B. Wilkinson, Philip Meldrum, Jonathan E. Chambers, Dane Liljestrand, Carlos Oroza, Steven K. Schmidt, Pacifica Sommers, Lara Vimercati, Trevor P. Irons, Zhou Lyu, Adam Solon, and James A. Bradley
The Cryosphere, 19, 401–421, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-401-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-401-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mihai O. Cimpoiasu, Oliver Kuras, Harry Harrison, Paul B. Wilkinson, Philip Meldrum, Jonathan E. Chambers, Dane Liljestrand, Carlos Oroza, Steven K. Schmidt, Pacifica Sommers, Lara Vimercati, Trevor P. Irons, Zhou Lyu, Adam Solon, and James A. Bradley

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-350', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Mar 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mihai Cimpoiasu, 08 May 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-350', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Apr 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mihai Cimpoiasu, 08 May 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-350', Anonymous Referee #3, 08 Apr 2024
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Mihai Cimpoiasu, 08 May 2024

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-350', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Mar 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mihai Cimpoiasu, 08 May 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-350', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Apr 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mihai Cimpoiasu, 08 May 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-350', Anonymous Referee #3, 08 Apr 2024
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Mihai Cimpoiasu, 08 May 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (27 May 2024) by Mohammad Farzamian
AR by Mihai Cimpoiasu on behalf of the Authors (10 Jun 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (14 Jun 2024) by Mohammad Farzamian
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (26 Jun 2024)
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (28 Jun 2024)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (09 Jul 2024) by Mohammad Farzamian
AR by Mihai Cimpoiasu on behalf of the Authors (17 Aug 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (03 Sep 2024) by Mohammad Farzamian
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (26 Sep 2024)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by editor and referees) (26 Sep 2024) by Mohammad Farzamian
AR by Mihai Cimpoiasu on behalf of the Authors (04 Nov 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (06 Nov 2024) by Mohammad Farzamian
ED: Publish as is (21 Nov 2024) by Mohammad Farzamian
AR by Mihai Cimpoiasu on behalf of the Authors (26 Nov 2024)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

29 Jan 2025
High-resolution 4D electrical resistivity tomography and below-ground point sensor monitoring of High Arctic deglaciated sediments capture zero-curtain effects, freeze–thaw transitions, and mid-winter thawing
Mihai O. Cimpoiasu, Oliver Kuras, Harry Harrison, Paul B. Wilkinson, Philip Meldrum, Jonathan E. Chambers, Dane Liljestrand, Carlos Oroza, Steven K. Schmidt, Pacifica Sommers, Lara Vimercati, Trevor P. Irons, Zhou Lyu, Adam Solon, and James A. Bradley
The Cryosphere, 19, 401–421, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-401-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-401-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mihai O. Cimpoiasu, Oliver Kuras, Harry Harrison, Paul B. Wilkinson, Philip Meldrum, Jonathan E. Chambers, Dane Liljestrand, Carlos Oroza, Steven K. Schmidt, Pacifica Sommers, Lara Vimercati, Trevor P. Irons, Zhou Lyu, Adam Solon, and James A. Bradley
Mihai O. Cimpoiasu, Oliver Kuras, Harry Harrison, Paul B. Wilkinson, Philip Meldrum, Jonathan E. Chambers, Dane Liljestrand, Carlos Oroza, Steven K. Schmidt, Pacifica Sommers, Lara Vimercati, Trevor P. Irons, Zhou Lyu, Adam Solon, and James A. Bradley

Viewed

Total article views: 690 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
476 182 32 690 18 24
  • HTML: 476
  • PDF: 182
  • XML: 32
  • Total: 690
  • BibTeX: 18
  • EndNote: 24
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Feb 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Feb 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 692 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 692 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jan 2025
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Young Arctic sediments, uncovered by retreating glaciers, are in continuous development, shaped by how water infiltrates and is stored in the near subsurface. Harsh weather conditions at high latitudes make direct observation of these environments extremely difficult. To address this, we deployed two automated sensor installations in Aug 21 on a glacier forefield in Svalbard. These recorded continuously for one year revealing unprecedented images of the ground’s freeze-thaw transition.