Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3324
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3324
04 Nov 2024
 | 04 Nov 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Validating laboratory insights into the drivers of soil rewetting respiration pulses with field measurements

Xiankun Li, Marleen Pallandt, Dilip Naidu, Johannes Rousk, Gustaf Hugelius, and Stefano Manzoni

Abstract. Improved understanding of the mechanisms driving heterotrophic CO2 emissions after rewetting of a dry soil may improve projections of future soil carbon fate. While drying and rewetting (DRW) under laboratory conditions has demonstrated that heterotrophic CO2 emissions depend on DRW features and soil and environmental conditions, these laboratory insights have not been validated in field conditions. To this aim, we collated mean respiration rates over 48 hours after rewetting from two data sources: 37 laboratory studies reporting data for more than three DRW cycles (laboratory respiration, LR), and six field datasets recording hourly heterotrophic respiration and soil moisture (field respiration, FR). LR and FR were explained by six predictors using random forest algorithms and partial dependence plots. Results indicated that the most important driver of LR and FR were SOC and temperature, respectively. Both LR and FR increased with increasing SOC and temperature. LR increased with soil dryness before rewetting, but this trend was less clear in FR. LR decreased with soil moisture increments at rewetting, while FR increased with soil moisture increments. LR was higher in soils from humid climates than from arid climates, but this effect was not observed in FR. We concluded that laboratory insights could be partly validated with current datasets. Caution should be taken when extending laboratory insights to predicting fluxes in ecosystem.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Xiankun Li, Marleen Pallandt, Dilip Naidu, Johannes Rousk, Gustaf Hugelius, and Stefano Manzoni

Status: open (until 23 Dec 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3324', Oliver Dilly, 18 Nov 2024 reply
    • CC2: 'Reply on CC1', Xiankun Li, 19 Nov 2024 reply
Xiankun Li, Marleen Pallandt, Dilip Naidu, Johannes Rousk, Gustaf Hugelius, and Stefano Manzoni
Xiankun Li, Marleen Pallandt, Dilip Naidu, Johannes Rousk, Gustaf Hugelius, and Stefano Manzoni

Viewed

Total article views: 150 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
119 25 6 150 16 2 2
  • HTML: 119
  • PDF: 25
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 150
  • Supplement: 16
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 150 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 150 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
While laboratory studies have identified many drivers and their effects on the carbon emission pulse after rewetting of dry soils, a validation with field data is still missing. Here, we show that the carbon emission pulse in the laboratory and in the field increases with soil organic carbon and temperature, but their trends with pre-rewetting dryness and moisture increment at rewetting differ. We conclude that the laboratory findings can be partially validated.