the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Marine snow morphology drives sinking and attenuation in the ocean interior
Abstract. Simultaneous measurements of marine snow (particles larger than 600 µm) morphologies, estimates of their in situ sinking speeds and midwater attenuation in export plumes were performed for the first time using a BGC-Argo float equipped with optical and imaging sensors. The float was deployed and recovered after one year drifting in the sluggish flow regime of the Angola basin. Six consecutive chlorophyll-a and particulate matter accumulation events were recorded at the surface, each followed by an export plume of sinking aggregates. Objects larger than 600 µm were classified using machine learning recognition and clustered into four morphological categories of marine aggregates. Plankton images were validated by an expert in a few broad categories. Results show that different types of aggregates were produced and exported from the different blooms. The different morphological categories of marine snow had different sinking speeds and attenuation for similar size indicating the effect of morphology on sinking speed. However, the typical size-to-sinking relationship for two of the categories and over the larger observed size range (100 µm-few mm) was also observed, indicating the importance of size for sinking. Surprisingly, calculated in situ sinking speeds were constantly in the lower range of known values usually assessed ex situ, suggesting a methodological effect which is discussed. Moving away from purely size-based velocity relationships and incorporating these additional morphological aggregates properties will help to improve mechanistic understanding of particle sinking and provide more accurate flux estimates. When used from autonomous platforms at high frequency, they will also provide increased spatio-temporal resolution for the observation of intermittent export events naturally occurring or induced by human activities associated with marine Carbon Dioxide Removal.
- Preprint
(1629 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1201 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3302', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Jan 2025
reply
The study makes a significant contribution to oceanographic research by addressing key gaps in our understanding of marine snow dynamics, particularly its morphology and sinking speeds. The use of in situ measurements from a BGC-Argo float equipped with advanced optical sensors represents an innovative approach, providing real-time, high-frequency data that enhance both spatial and temporal resolution.
The scientific methodology is robust, combining in situ measurements, unsupervised classification, and a thorough analysis of environmental variables. The integration of UVP6 imaging with biogeochemical sensors enables a detailed investigation of particle dynamics, surpassing traditional size-based relationships.
The manuscript is well-organized, with clear sections that guide the reader through the methodology, results, and implications. Figures and tables are informative;
Overall Evaluation
The article is a strong contribution to the field, combining methodological innovation with significant findings that enhance our understanding of marine snow dynamics. Addressing the following recommendations would further strengthen the impact and clarity of the manuscript:Argo Data Usage
Please clarify where the Argo float data originate from. Did you use a DOI monthly snapshot from ARGO? (http://www.argodatamgt.org/Access-to-data/Argo-DOI-Digital-Object-Identifier).
Specify which Argo data were utilized and confirm whether ADJUSTED data were used when available.
Clearly state which quality control (QC) procedures were applied to the data. This is essential to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the analysis. If any modifications or deviations from standard Argo QC protocols were made, they should be explicitly described.Argo Program Acknowledgment
The provided link (https://fleetmonitoring.euro-argo.eu/float/6903095) is incorrect and is not the proper ARGO link for the data. Please ensure correct referencing of the Argo Program.
Include the following acknowledgment for Argo data and its DOI:
"Argo data were collected and made freely available by the International Argo Program and the national programs that contribute to it. (https://argo.ucsd.edu, https://www.ocean-ops.org). The Argo Program is part of the Global Ocean Observing System.
Reference: Argo (2000). Argo float data and metadata from Global Data Assembly Centre (Argo GDAC). SEANOE. http://doi.org/10.17882/42182"Technical Corrections
Lines 157–161: The serial numbers of the sensors are not a key point; please consider removing them.
Line 295 and Figures 3, 4: Use Bbp, not bbp.
When referencing "Bbp POC," ensure consistent terminology throughout the manuscript.Figures 3, 6, and 5A are not very clear, possibly because they are too small.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3302-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
241 | 73 | 7 | 321 | 22 | 3 | 3 |
- HTML: 241
- PDF: 73
- XML: 7
- Total: 321
- Supplement: 22
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1