the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The satellite chlorophyll signature of Lagrangian eddy trapping varies regionally and seasonally within a subtropical gyre
Abstract. Vertical motions of mesoscale ocean eddies modulate the resource environment, productivity, and phytoplankton biomass in the ocean's subtropical gyres. The horizontal circulations can trap or disperse the eddy-driven chlorophyll anomalies, which can be observed from space. From two decades of satellite remote sensing observations in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (NPSG), we compared the chlorophyll anomalies within "leaky" eddy boundaries identified using an Eulerian Sea Level Anomaly (SLA) method, and within strictly coherent "trapping" bounds derived from Lagrangian particle simulations. On average, NPSG Lagrangian coherent vortices maintain stronger chlorophyll anomalies than Eulerian SLA eddies due to the limitation of lateral dilution. This is observed in both cyclones and anticyclones. However, there is variability in the biological signature of trapping by sub-region and season. Eddy trapping of positive chlorophyll anomalies is most significant in the southern regions of the NPSG, counter to expectations from the latitudinal trend of the nonlinearity parameter. We found weak relationships between eddy age and the magnitude of surface chlorophyll anomalies in most observations of long-lived Lagrangian coherent vortices with the strongest exception in wintertime anticyclones in the Lee of the Hawaiian Islands. These results challenge the assumption that Eulerian-identified mesoscale eddy boundaries are coherent and suggest that Lagrangian trapping, combined with regional and seasonal factors, shapes the chlorophyll concentrations of subtropical mesoscale eddies.
- Preprint
(17722 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 18 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3211', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Dec 2024
reply
The paper investigates the role of mesoscale ocean eddies in shaping chlorophyll-a distributions within the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (NPSG) by comparing Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for eddy identification. Using two decades of satellite observations, the authors demonstrate that Lagrangian Coherent Vortices (RCLVs) maintain stronger chlorophyll anomalies compared to Eulerian-identified eddies due to limited lateral dilution. The study reveals significant regional and seasonal variability, highlighting distinct patterns in chlorophyll anomalies among northern, southeastern, and Hawaiian Lee Eddies. This research challenges traditional assumptions about mesoscale eddy trapping and provides valuable insights into their biogeochemical impacts.
The paper presents a well-rounded introduction enriched with relevant references, offering a concise and clear overview of the state of the art. That being said, I suggest the authors reconsider whether it is necessary to split the introduction into three different sections. I believe it would work better as a single section without subsections.
The limitations of each method are clearly stated and well-argued. The results are well-scoped, the figures are of high quality, and future steps are clearly defined. Some results are supported by illustrative sketches, which enhance clarity and help readers visualize complex processes. The discussion is extensive, well-founded, enriched with relevant references, and solid in its argumentation.
My recommendation is acceptance if the minor revisions are successfully addressed to ensure that the present results are confirmed to be robust against error analysis (see Major comments).
Minor comments:
- In the abstract, every key concept is briefly explained; however, non-expert readers may struggle to understand what the authors mention in lines 10–11 unless a brief explanation of the nonlinearity parameter is provided.
- In the abstract, line 13: I suggest the authors explicitly state the finding. Is it a positive or negative relationship? The answer seems to be in lines 322–323. Please avoid leaving open questions or ambiguity about your results in the abstract.
- Line 128: Which figure are the authors referring to? Please clarify.
- Lines 380–381: I suggest the authors properly frame the results to the study region in these lines. While the findings are suggestive of broader applications, the authors cannot extend these conclusions globally without demonstration.
- Figure 2: The caption could benefit from more details about the zoomed-in view shown in the right-hand side panel.
- Figure 6: Increase the grid resolution to improve the readability of values in the composite subplots.
- Figures B6, B7, and B9: The percentages are difficult to read due to overlapping text. Adjust the layout to improve clarity.
Major comments:
- There is an important aspect that the authors have omitted in their work and that requires attention. To increase the robustness of the results and the significance of the observed distinct patterns, I suggest the authors include an error analysis to better assess the magnitude of the differences discussed. On many occasions, the differences presented are very small, yet they are claimed to be significantly distinct. Since the values discussed here are not straightforward or intuitive for routine daily use, readers need background information about the errors to properly interpret and contextualize the differences being reported. Please provide information on this. The current version lacks on any information about error analysis.
- I believe the authors should expand the conclusions section. It should be self-contained and comprehensible when read in isolation. In its current form, it omits many relevant results, limitations, and future perspectives. Please enrich the conclusions with more details (drawn from the discussion section) to provide a comprehensive closure to the study.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3211-RC1
Data sets
North Pacific Subtropical Gyre RCLV Atlas (version 2) Alexandra E. Jones-Kellett https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10849221
Model code and software
RCLVAtlas Alexandra E. Jones-Kellett https://github.com/lexi-jones/RCLVatlas
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
105 | 26 | 13 | 144 | 4 | 3 |
- HTML: 105
- PDF: 26
- XML: 13
- Total: 144
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1