the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Mechanistic insights into chloroacetic acid production from atmospheric multiphase VOC-chlorine chemistry
Abstract. Chlorine-containing oxygenated volatile organic compounds (Cl-OVOCs) are indicators of atmospheric chlorine chemistry involving volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, their formation mechanisms are insufficiently understood. Herein, a strong diel pattern of chloroacetic acid (C2H3O2Cl) was observed with daytime peaks at 19 and 13 ppt (1-hour averages) in 2020 and 2021, respectively, at a coastal site in southern China. Ethene was previously proposed as the primary precursor responsible for daytime C2H3O2Cl levels, but a photochemical box model based on Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) simulations indicates that ethene accounts for less than 1 %. Quantum chemical calculations suggest that other alkenes also can act as chloroacetic acid precursors. Using an updated gas-phase VOC-Cl chemistry model, we find that isoprene, the most abundant VOC at the sampling site, along with its oxidation products, accounts for 7 % of the observed C2H3O2Cl levels. Moreover, the simulation with the updated MCM produces appreciable levels of other Cl-OVOCs, especially chloro-acetaldehyde, a precursor of C2H3O2Cl. We proposed the multiphase reaction of Cl-OVOCs to reconcile the overestimation of Cl-OVOCs and the underestimation of C2H3O2Cl in our gas-phase model. The estimated reactive uptake coefficients for various Cl-OVOCs range from 3.63 × 10-5 to 2.34 × 10-2, according to quantum chemical calculations and linear relationship modeling. Box model simulation with multiphase chemistry reveals that the heterogeneous conversion of chloro-acetaldehyde to C2H3O2Cl is a more important source of C2H3O2Cl than gas-phase reactions. Our study thus proposes a formation mechanism of gaseous C2H3O2Cl and highlights the potential importance of multiphase processes in VOC-Cl chemistry.
- Preprint
(1231 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1526 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-3137', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Nov 2024
reply
Li et al. present observations of chloroacetic acid at a rural site in Hong Kong and showed that its formation cannot be fully explained by existing mechanisms. They propose two potential pathways for its production: (1) isoprene and its oxidation products, and (2) multiphase reactions. The draft is well-structured, and the results are clearly presented. However, I suggest the authors address the following comments before the manuscript is accepted for publication in ACP:
- The estimation of the reactive uptake coefficient relies on linear relationship models based on several OVOCs. I recommend evaluating the accuracy of this linear model and discussing the uncertainties associated with these uptake coefficients.
- The updated gas-phase chlorine chemistry and VOC-Cl model predict Cl-OVOCs concentrations up to 1 ppb, which significantly exceeds the observed values. The authors should provide an explanation for this large discrepancy.
- The inclusion of both updated gas-phase chemistry and heterogeneous reactions increases the simulated levels of chloroacetic acid by 32–56%. I suggest adding a discussion on the potential role of other missing mechanisms to account for the remaining gap.
- Line 193: Considering the slow rate of hydrolysis reactions, how do QC calculations support the plausibility of chloroacetic acid formation via multiphase processes? This result appears contradictory.
- Lines 131–134 and Figure S1: The correlation coefficient between Sa and C2H3O2Cl is not strong enough to indicate a robust correlation. Please address this limitation.
- Figure 1: Why are the observed C2H3O2Cl levels higher in 2020 compared to 2021? Can this discrepancy be explained by the proposed mechanisms?
- Figure 4: The model-simulated diurnal cycle of Cl-OVOCs does not match the observed diurnal pattern of C2H3O2Cl shown in Figure 1. Please explain this inconsistency.
- Figure 4: The gray shading representing C2H3O2Cl is not visible in the plot. Please clarify or correct this issue.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3137-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
150 | 48 | 12 | 210 | 29 | 4 | 3 |
- HTML: 150
- PDF: 48
- XML: 12
- Total: 210
- Supplement: 29
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1