Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3107
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3107
05 Nov 2024
 | 05 Nov 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Six years of greenhouse gas fluxes at Saclay, France, estimated with the Radon Tracer Method

Camille Yver-Kwok, Michel Ramonet, Léonard Rivier, Jinghui Lian, Claudia Grossi, Roger Curcoll, Dafina Kikaj, Edward Chung, and Ute Karstens

Abstract. Here, we use carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O) and radon (222Rn) data from the Saclay ICOS tall tower in France to estimate CO2, CH4 and CO fluxes within the station footprint from January 2017 to December 2022 and N2O fluxes from February 2019 to December 2022 using the Radon Tracer Method (RTM).

We first performed a sensitivity study of this method applied to CH4 and combined with different radon exhalation maps including the improved European process-based radon flux maps developed within 19ENV01 traceRadon and back-trajectories in order to optimize it. Then, radon exhalation maps from the 19ENV01 traceRadon project, STILT trajectories from the ICOS Carbon Portal, best estimate of radon activity concentration and greenhouse gas data have been used to estimate the surface emissions. To our knowledge, this is the first study using the latest radon exhalation maps and standardized radon measurements to estimate CO2, CH4, CO and N2O surface emissions. We found that the average RTM estimates are 609 ± 402 mg m−2 h−1, 0.81 ± 0.66 mg m−2 h−1, 1.04±1.80 mg m−2 h−1 and 0.063 ± 0.079 mg m−2 h−1 for CO2, CH4, CO and N2O respectively. These fluxes are in good agreement with the literature.

CH4, N2O and CO are in fair agreement with the inventories, though with higher values. CO2 fluxes are about five times higher than modeled anthropogenic and biogenic fluxes combined. The differences mainly occur during summer, and the CO/CO2 ratio points toward a misrepresentation of the biogenic fluxes at this time by the WRF-VPRM version used here.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Camille Yver-Kwok, Michel Ramonet, Léonard Rivier, Jinghui Lian, Claudia Grossi, Roger Curcoll, Dafina Kikaj, Edward Chung, and Ute Karstens

Status: open (until 17 Dec 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Camille Yver-Kwok, Michel Ramonet, Léonard Rivier, Jinghui Lian, Claudia Grossi, Roger Curcoll, Dafina Kikaj, Edward Chung, and Ute Karstens
Camille Yver-Kwok, Michel Ramonet, Léonard Rivier, Jinghui Lian, Claudia Grossi, Roger Curcoll, Dafina Kikaj, Edward Chung, and Ute Karstens

Viewed

Total article views: 27 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
24 2 1 27 0 0
  • HTML: 24
  • PDF: 2
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 27
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Nov 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 27 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 27 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
Here, we use greenhouse gas and radon data from a tall tower in France to estimate their fluxes within the station footprint from January 2017 to December 2022 using the Radon Tracer Method. Using the latest radon exhalation maps and standardized radon measurements, we found the greenhouse gas fluxes to be in agreement with the literature. Compared to inventories, there is a general agreement except for carbon dioxide where we show that the biogenic fluxes are not well represented in the model.