Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3101
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3101
21 Nov 2024
 | 21 Nov 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Portable X-Ray Fluorescence as a Tool for Urban Soil Contamination Analysis: Accuracy, Precision, and Practicality

Eriell Jenkins, John Galbraith, and Anna Paltseva

Abstract. Urban agriculture has become an essential component of urban sustainability, but it often faces the challenge of soil contamination with heavy metal(loid)s like lead (Pb), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn). Traditional laboratory methods for detecting these contaminants, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and inductively coupled plasma techniques (ICP-MS, ICP-OES, ICP-AES), are accurate but can be costly, time-consuming, and require extensive sample preparation. Portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) presents a promising alternative, offering rapid, in situ analysis with minimal sample preparation. The study reviews literature on PXRF analyzers to determine their accuracy and precision in analyzing heavy metal(loid)s in urban soils, with the goal of optimizing sampling, reducing laboratory costs and time, and identifying priority metal contamination hotspots. A literature review was conducted using Web of Science and Google Scholar, focusing on studies that validated PXRF measurements with alternate laboratory methods or certified reference materials (CRMs). This study reviews 67 publications to evaluate the accuracy and precision of PXRF in analyzing heavy metal(loid)s in urban soils. The review covers instrument types, calibration methods, testing conditions, and sample preparation techniques. Results show that, when properly calibrated, particularly with CRMs, PXRF achieves reliable accuracy. Ex situ measurements tend to be more precise due to controlled conditions, although in situ measurements offer practical advantages in urban settings. Portable XRF emerges as a viable method for assessing urban soil contamination, balancing accuracy and practicality. Future research should focus on optimizing sample preparation and calibration to further enhance PXRF reliability in urban environments. This review highlights PXRF’s potential to streamline soil testing, reduce costs, and identify contamination hotspots, contributing to safer urban agriculture and more precise soil survey and conservation efforts.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Eriell Jenkins, John Galbraith, and Anna Paltseva

Status: open (until 02 Jan 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Eriell Jenkins, John Galbraith, and Anna Paltseva
Eriell Jenkins, John Galbraith, and Anna Paltseva
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
This review examines the use of portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) technology to detect harmful metals in urban soils. PXRF provides a fast, cost-effective method for analyzing contaminated soils, essential for safe urban agriculture. The review highlights PXRF's accuracy and limitations, stressing the need for proper calibration and sample preparation. These findings will help inform future efforts to enhance soil health and environmental safety in urban areas.