Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3024
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3024
15 Oct 2024
 | 15 Oct 2024
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Intercomparison of wind speed, temperature, and humidity data between dropsondes and aircraft in situ measurements

Soodabeh Namdari, Sanja Dmitrovic, Gao Chen, Yonghoon Choi, Ewan Crosbie, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Simon Kirschler, John B. Nowak, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Holger Vömel, Xubin Zeng, and Armin Sorooshian

Abstract. Airborne measurements of winds, temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH) are critical due to their importance for atmospheric processes. Data quality from these in situ measurements is difficult to assess and requires independent observations. This work intercompares for the first time in situ measurements from the Turbulent Air Motion Measurement System (TAMMS) of horizontal winds and T, and a diode laser hygrometer (RH) deployed on a HU-25 Falcon flying mostly within the marine boundary layer over the northwest Atlantic to an independent set of measurements from dropsondes launched from a higher-flying King Air. Leveraging data from 162 joint flights from these two spatially coordinated aircraft during the NASA ACTIVATE campaign in winter and summer seasons between 2020–2022, a total of 555 pairs of Falcon-dropsonde data points are identified within 30 km horizontal separation, minimal vertical separation (usually < 1 m), and within 15 minutes. This analysis is based on the following range of conditions experienced: altitude = ~0.1–5 km; T = -19 – 27 °C; RH = 1 – 100 %; wind speed = 0.2 – 42 m s-1. Based on scatterplots, correlation coefficients, and mean (in situ – dropsonde) error (ME), intercomparisons reveal good agreement for wind speed (r = 0.95, ME = 0.21 ± 1.68 m s-1), the u/v wind components (r ~ 0.96–0.97, ME ~ 0.03 – 0.16 (± 1.62 – 1.67) m s-1), wind direction (r = 0.94, ME = 0.00 ± 0.22 based on cosine of direction angles), T (r = 0.99, ME = 0.00 ± 0.71 °C), and RH (r = 0.91, ME = -3.86 ± 10.74 %). Sensitivity analysis shows that binning data into categories of horizontal separation distance, clear versus cloud, winter versus summer, altitude range, and terciles of the values examined variables did not yield major changes except for RH where there was more deviation especially above 70 %. The effect of statistics was examined by relaxing the vertical separation distance criteria to expand the number of pairs to over 360,000, without much difference in intercomparison metrics. The effect of averaging more points for each instrument in the final 555 pairs was also shown to lead to minimal change in agreement. Overall, these results provide confidence in the performance of the various measurement techniques for airborne field campaigns.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Soodabeh Namdari, Sanja Dmitrovic, Gao Chen, Yonghoon Choi, Ewan Crosbie, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Simon Kirschler, John B. Nowak, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Holger Vömel, Xubin Zeng, and Armin Sorooshian

Status: open (until 20 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Soodabeh Namdari, Sanja Dmitrovic, Gao Chen, Yonghoon Choi, Ewan Crosbie, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Simon Kirschler, John B. Nowak, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Holger Vömel, Xubin Zeng, and Armin Sorooshian
Soodabeh Namdari, Sanja Dmitrovic, Gao Chen, Yonghoon Choi, Ewan Crosbie, Joshua P. DiGangi, Glenn S. Diskin, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Simon Kirschler, John B. Nowak, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Christiane Voigt, Holger Vömel, Xubin Zeng, and Armin Sorooshian
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 15 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
We conducted this study to assess the accuracy of airborne measurements of wind, temperature, and humidity, essential for understanding atmospheric processes. Using data from NASA's ACTIVATE campaign, we compared measurements from the TAMMS and DLH aboard a Falcon aircraft with dropsondes from a King Air, matching data points based on location and time using statistical methods. The study showed strong agreement, confirming the reliability of these methods for advancing climate models.