the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Surprise floods: the role of our imagination in preparing for disasters
Abstract. What’s the worst that could happen? After a flood has devasted communities, those people affected, the news media, and the authorities often say that what happened was beyond our imagination. Imagination encompasses the picturing of a situation in our mind linked with the emotions that we connect with this situation. However, the role imagination actually plays in disasters remains unclear. In this regard, we analysed the responses of a survey which was disseminated in the 2021 flood affected areas of Germany. Some respondents perceived that due to their lack of imagination of the flood, they did not take adequate action in advance. This indicates that imagination plays an important role in disaster preparedness. Limited or lacking imagination could be linked to never having experienced a flood before, difficulties in interpreting forecasts and warnings, the perceived distance to waterbodies, and cognitive biases such as wishful thinking. Based on these results, we recommend future research should investigate to what extend visual support can advance forecast and warning communication in triggering the imagination of citizens in short-term. In a long-term perspective, research should focus how to cultivate imagination over time through participatory risk management, developing climate storylines, citizen weather observations, and the like.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(526 KB)
-
Supplement
(214 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(526 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(214 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-296', Hanna Ruszczyk, 09 Feb 2024
Dear Authors,
Congratulations! I think this is an excellent paper with a solid contribution to new knowledge in the disasters field. Imagination, the way you present it and its relationship to risk perception, is well presented and discussed.
I would not make any substantive changes to the text except for the following: on page 2, line 53 you state that the study aims to bridge the gap to early action. I do not think the paper does this in much detail and this aim should be removed.
Best wishes,
Hanna Ruszczyk
Durham University, IHRR
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-296-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joy Ommer, 05 Apr 2024
Thank you very much for your lovely feedback! We will integrate your suggestion!
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-296-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joy Ommer, 05 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-296', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Mar 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joy Ommer, 05 Apr 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-296', Hanna Ruszczyk, 09 Feb 2024
Dear Authors,
Congratulations! I think this is an excellent paper with a solid contribution to new knowledge in the disasters field. Imagination, the way you present it and its relationship to risk perception, is well presented and discussed.
I would not make any substantive changes to the text except for the following: on page 2, line 53 you state that the study aims to bridge the gap to early action. I do not think the paper does this in much detail and this aim should be removed.
Best wishes,
Hanna Ruszczyk
Durham University, IHRR
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-296-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joy Ommer, 05 Apr 2024
Thank you very much for your lovely feedback! We will integrate your suggestion!
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-296-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Joy Ommer, 05 Apr 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-296', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Mar 2024
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Joy Ommer, 05 Apr 2024
Peer review completion
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
404 | 222 | 26 | 652 | 49 | 17 | 18 |
- HTML: 404
- PDF: 222
- XML: 26
- Total: 652
- Supplement: 49
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Joy Ommer
Jess Neumann
Milan Kalas
Sophie Blackburn
Hannah L. Cloke
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(526 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(214 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
- Final revised paper