the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Peltigera lichen thalli produce highly efficient ice nucleating agents
Abstract. From extracellular freezing to cloud glaciation, the crystallization of water is ubiquitous and shapes life as we know it. Efficient biological ice nucleators (INs) are crucial for organism survival in cold environments and, when aerosolized, serve as a significant source of atmospheric ice nuclei. Several lichen species have been identified as potent INs capable of inducing freezing at high subzero temperatures. Despite their importance, the abundance and diversity of lichen INs are still not well understood. Here, we investigate ice nucleation activity in the cyanolichen-forming genus Peltigera from across a range of ecosystems in the Arctic, the Northwestern United States, and Central and South America. We find strong IN activity in all tested Peltigera species, with ice nucleation temperatures above -12 °C, and 35 % of the samples initiating freezing at temperatures at or above -6.2 °C. The Peltigera INs in aqueous extract appear resistant to freeze-thaw cycles, suggesting that they can survive dispersal through the atmosphere and thereby potentially influence precipitation patterns. An axenic fungal culture termed L01-tf-B03, from the lichen Peltigera britannica JNU22, displayed an ice nucleation temperature of -5.6 °C at 1 mg mL-1 and retained remarkably efficient IN-activity at concentrations as low as 0.1 ng mL-1. Our analysis suggests that the INs released from this fungus in culture are 1000 times more efficient than the most potent bacterial INs from Pseudomonas syringae. The global distribution of Peltigera lichens, in combination with the IN-efficiency, emphasizes their potential to act as powerful ice nucleating agents in the atmosphere.
- Preprint
(791 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(113 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2024-2959', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Nov 2024
reply
This article presents investigations into lichen of the genus Peltigera as producers of ice nucleators (INs). It is well-conceived, methodologically sound, and enjoyable to read. The insights gained through these investigations are new and interesting, so they merit publication in Biogeosciences. There are a few minor issues I recommend the authors to consider in a revision:
1.) Peltigera are mostly ground-dwelling and have a compact morphology. Which process could dislocate particles small enough from them to escape the surface layer and reach higher altitudes? I would appreciate to a sentence or two on that issue in in the Conclusions.
2.) Lines 31-33 and lines 330-333 state: "Our analysis suggests that the INs released from this fungus in culture are 1000 times more efficient than the most potent bacterial INs from Pseudomonas syringae." I find the term "efficient" problematic in this context because "efficient" often refers to the activation temperature of INs, i.e., INs active > -10°C (e.g., Zhang et al., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105129). You also define T50 as a measure of efficiency (lines 168-169).
3.) Line 113: What is meant with "bioavailability" here?
4.) Lines 168-169: "The temperature at which 50% of the droplets froze, T50, was recorded as a measure of the efficiency of the INs." I guess it means the same as "freezing efficiency", an expression first used in line 201? If so, please add (in brackets) this term to the end of the sentence in lines 168-169.
5.) Line 170: The T50 value of water is relatively high (-11°C). Were values of Peltigera samples corrected for that and, if so, how?
6.) Line 173: Consider replacing "robust" with "precise".
7.) Lines 212-216: The 96 droplets in TINA experiments may be large enough a number to derive differential IN-spectra from (see Vali, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1219-2019). Differential spectra afford clearer interpretation than cumulative spectra, especially in the context of your study.
8.) Table 1: Isn't it surprising that the warmest T50 was found in a species collected in the tropics? Could this be taken as an indication for IN production in Peltigera being similarly incidental as it seems to be in pollen (Kinney et al., 2024, doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2705)?
9.) There appears to be a contradiction in lines 263-265: "Based on the fast growth rate and
presence of mycelial-like growth, we classified L01-tf-B03 as a lichen-associated fungus. It is notoriously difficult to isolate mycobionts (Cornejo et al., 2015), which are very slow growing, ..." Why should the fast growth rate seen in L01-tf-B03 support your classification when mycobionts are very slow growing?
10.) Lines 279-280: The T50 value of -23.5°C indicated here is much lower than the one mentioned in line 170 (-11°C). Please clarify.
11.) Lines 284-286: " The large decrease of over 4°C in bacterial freezing efficiency is in striking contrast to L01-tf-B03, for which the IN-activity is reduced by less than 1°C at the same concentration." I think this finding merits an attempt at interpretation.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2959-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
130 | 48 | 10 | 188 | 9 | 2 | 1 |
- HTML: 130
- PDF: 48
- XML: 10
- Total: 188
- Supplement: 9
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 1
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1